1
$\begingroup$

Let $(R,+,\cdot)$ be a finite ring. Obviously, $(R,+)$ is an abelian group; however the unit (multiplicative) group need not be abelian.

My question is the following problem:

Given the dual group $\widehat{R}$ of $(R,+)$, under what conditions of $R$ is it true that

$$ \#\{\text{primitive* characters in ($\widehat{R},\cdot$)} =\#R^\times, $$ i.e. when does the number of primitive* characters of the abelian group $(R,+)$ equal the number of units in $R$?

*((Added)). A character $\chi\in\widehat{R}$ is said to be primitive with respect to a collection $\mathcal{C}$ of subgroups of $(R, +)$ if $\chi$ does not descend to a character on any quotient group $R/S$ for all $S\in\mathcal{C}$. To descend here is canonical in the sense that $\chi$ is invariant on the elements of any coset of $R/S$.

NOTES
The archetypal example is the ring $\mathbb{Z}/n\mathbb{Z}=(\{0,1,2,\dotsc,n-1\},+,\cdot)$ of integers modulo $n$ where the answer is positive when $\mathcal{C}$ contains all $\mathbb{Z}/d\mathbb{Z}$ for all $d$ divides $n$.

$\endgroup$
5
  • 3
    $\begingroup$ What is a primitive character? \\ TeX note: for text in math mode, use \text, e.g., "$\text{primitive characters in $(\widehat R, \cdot)$}$" \text{primitive characters in $(\widehat{R}, \cdot)$} instead of "$primitive~characters~in~(\widehat R, \cdot)$" primitive~characters~in~(\widehat{R}, \cdot). I have edited accordingly. $\endgroup$
    – LSpice
    Commented Jul 4 at 22:19
  • $\begingroup$ Thank you, @LSpice for the question. I have included the definition. My apologies. $\endgroup$ Commented Jul 5 at 12:10
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Your definition of "primitive" relies on a collection of subgroups, which you do not specify. Your example does not give an example of subgroups, but rather of quotients, and calls no character primitive (take $d = n$, or, if you meant the subgroup $(n/d)\mathbb Z/n\mathbb Z$, take $d = 1$). Do you mean to consider all non-trivial subgroups, i.e., all proper quotients? $\endgroup$
    – LSpice
    Commented Jul 5 at 17:10
  • $\begingroup$ Rather than editing a question to invalidate an existing answer, it is better to accept the answer if it resolves your original question (which I believe it does), and to ask a follow-up, modified question if needed. $\endgroup$
    – LSpice
    Commented Jul 10 at 19:57
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ Thank you @LSpice. I will do so straightaway. $\endgroup$ Commented Jul 10 at 20:01

1 Answer 1

4
$\begingroup$

The rings $\mathbb{Z}/n$ are the only examples.

I assume that "primitive character" just means that it is faithful, or equivalently that it does not factor through a proper quotient; this is the meaning for Dirichlet characters, I think.

The fact that this is true for $R = \mathbb{Z}/n$ is sort of a coincidence. It comes from the fact that

  • the primitive characters of $\mathbb{Z}/n$ can canonically be identified with the primitive $n^\text{th}$ roots of unity in $\mathbb{C}$, and there are $\varphi(n)$ of these, and
  • the unit group $(\mathbb{Z}/n)^{\times}$ of $\mathbb{Z}/n$ also has size $\varphi(n)$.

These can't be canonically identified (the latter is a group but the former isn't). The unit group does act freely and transitively on the primitive $n^\text{th}$ roots of unity, because it is also the automorphism group $\operatorname{Aut}(\mathbb{Z}/n)$, and the Galois group $\operatorname{Gal}(\mathbb{Q}(\zeta_n)/\mathbb{Q})$, but to get an identification from here requires choosing a primitive $n^\text{th}$ root of unity, and to identify $\operatorname{Aut}(\mathbb{Z}/n)$ with the unit group involves the isomorphism $\operatorname{End}(\mathbb{Z}/n) \cong \mathbb{Z}/n$, where $\mathbb{Z}/n$ is an abelian group on the LHS and a ring on the RHS. So there are four interesting sets here all of which have cardinality $\varphi(n)$, as well as two different versions of $\mathbb{Z}/n$, the group and the ring.

In general the number of primitive characters of the additive group of $R$ is zero; among the finite abelian groups only the finite cyclic groups can have primitive characters (since these are the only finite subgroups of $\mathbb{C}^{\times}$). It is only nonzero if $(R, +) \cong \mathbb{Z}/n$, meaning it must be additively generated by a single $r \in R$, meaning $1$ must be an integer multiple of $r$, say $1 = kr$. This means $k$ and $r$ must be units $\bmod n$ so $r = k^{-1} \cdot 1$ and $R \cong \mathbb{Z}/n$ as a ring.

$\endgroup$
1
  • $\begingroup$ Thank you for your answer @Qiaochu Yuan. I was hoping for a positive answer for other finite rings if one considers only (possibly) a subcollection of the proper quotients, and not all of them. I have asked this as a new question here (mathoverflow.net/questions/474825/…) $\endgroup$ Commented Jul 10 at 20:36

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .