5
$\begingroup$

A rooted, labeled tree on $n$ vertices is a tree with vertex set $[n] := \{1,2,\ldots,n\}$ in which one vertex has been designated the root. A leaf of a rooted tree is a vertex $v$ for which either: $v$ is not the root and has degree $1$; or $v$ is the root and has degree $0$.

Using standard generating function techniques (i.e. Lagrange inversion) it is not hard to prove that the number $t_{n,m}$ of rooted, labeled trees on $n$ vertices with exactly $m$ leaves is $t_{n,m} = \frac{n!}{m!} S(n-1,n-m)$, where $S(n,k)$ is the Stirling number of the $2$nd kind.

Together with Cayley's formula, this gives a proof of the identity $n^{n-1} = \sum_{m=1}^{n} \frac{n!}{m!} S(n-1,n-m)$.

But actually there is a much simpler proof of that identity: $\frac{n!}{m!} S(n-1,n-m)$ clearly counts the number of functions $f\colon [n-1]\to [n]$ whose image has cardinality $n-m$.

This makes me wonder: is there a simple bijection between functions $[n-1]\to [n]$ and rooted, labeled trees on $n$ vertices for which $n$ minus the cardinality of the image becomes the number of leaves of the tree?

Unless I'm mistaken, the Prüfer code does not accomplish this.

$\endgroup$
2
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ If you attach a vertex $n+1$ to the root then isn't the Prüfer code of the resulting tree a sequence of $n-1$ integers from $[n]$, none of which is one of the leaves, and which includes all of the non-leaves? $\endgroup$ Commented Mar 30, 2022 at 21:59
  • $\begingroup$ @PeterTaylor: Oh dear, I think you're right, I don't know how I missed that! If you post that as an answer I'll happily accept it. $\endgroup$ Commented Mar 30, 2022 at 22:01

1 Answer 1

5
$\begingroup$

If you identify a function $f: [n-1] \to [n]$ with the Prüfer code $(f(1), f(2), \ldots, f(n-1))$ then it corresponds to an unrooted labelled tree on $n+1$ vertices in which the label $n+1$ is a leaf. Designate the neighbour of that leaf as the root and delete the leaf and you have the desired bijection.

$\endgroup$

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .