Skip to main content
added 628 characters in body
Source Link
Will Jagy
  • 25.7k
  • 2
  • 65
  • 121

Yeah, this works, book is Topological Graph Theory by Gross and Tucker, mostly pages 216-217. First we have, on page 4, Theorem 1.1.1 by Euler, the sum of the valences is twice the number of edges. So the average valence is $\frac{2 E}{V}.$

Very much in the same vein, the sum over all the faces is twice the number of edges, so the average edges per face is $\frac{2 E}{F}.$

Your hypothesis is that the average valence is exactly three, so $$ 3 V = 2 E. $$

The Euler characteristic says $V - E + F = 0,$ or $F = E - V,$ or $$3 F = 3 E - 3 V = 3 E - 2 E = E,$$ so $6 F = 2 E$ and $$ \frac{2 E}{F} = 6. $$

There is a figure of $K_7$ on the torus on page 137, the dual would be seven hexagons. So that is the prototype, but of course you can take any large section of hexagon wallpaper and carefully place a rectangle on it to get another example. I don't know what happens if you start with a pentagon and go from there. There is also the one with octagons and squares.

Indeed, we can do this with any doubly periodic tiling, perhaps convex polygons if that can be arranged. Then, for any vertex with valence larger $n >3,$ replace the vertex with a little $n$-gon with vertices along each of the $n$ edges. For doubly periodic, this is a finite set of replacements, so we can make all sorts of examples on the torus that satisfy the valence three requirement. In particular, I have in mind one made up of pentagons, each pentagon with three vertices of valence 3 but two vertices of valence 4. Replacing these with little squares, we get a tiling of the torus with squares and heptagons. Who knew?

Yeah, this works, book is Topological Graph Theory by Gross and Tucker, mostly pages 216-217. First we have, on page 4, Theorem 1.1.1 by Euler, the sum of the valences is twice the number of edges. So the average valence is $\frac{2 E}{V}.$

Very much in the same vein, the sum over all the faces is twice the number of edges, so the average edges per face is $\frac{2 E}{F}.$

Your hypothesis is that the average valence is exactly three, so $$ 3 V = 2 E. $$

The Euler characteristic says $V - E + F = 0,$ or $F = E - V,$ or $$3 F = 3 E - 3 V = 3 E - 2 E = E,$$ so $6 F = 2 E$ and $$ \frac{2 E}{F} = 6. $$

There is a figure of $K_7$ on the torus on page 137, the dual would be seven hexagons. So that is the prototype, but of course you can take any large section of hexagon wallpaper and carefully place a rectangle on it to get another example. I don't know what happens if you start with a pentagon and go from there. There is also the one with octagons and squares.

Yeah, this works, book is Topological Graph Theory by Gross and Tucker, mostly pages 216-217. First we have, on page 4, Theorem 1.1.1 by Euler, the sum of the valences is twice the number of edges. So the average valence is $\frac{2 E}{V}.$

Very much in the same vein, the sum over all the faces is twice the number of edges, so the average edges per face is $\frac{2 E}{F}.$

Your hypothesis is that the average valence is exactly three, so $$ 3 V = 2 E. $$

The Euler characteristic says $V - E + F = 0,$ or $F = E - V,$ or $$3 F = 3 E - 3 V = 3 E - 2 E = E,$$ so $6 F = 2 E$ and $$ \frac{2 E}{F} = 6. $$

There is a figure of $K_7$ on the torus on page 137, the dual would be seven hexagons. So that is the prototype, but of course you can take any large section of hexagon wallpaper and carefully place a rectangle on it to get another example. I don't know what happens if you start with a pentagon and go from there. There is also the one with octagons and squares.

Indeed, we can do this with any doubly periodic tiling, perhaps convex polygons if that can be arranged. Then, for any vertex with valence larger $n >3,$ replace the vertex with a little $n$-gon with vertices along each of the $n$ edges. For doubly periodic, this is a finite set of replacements, so we can make all sorts of examples on the torus that satisfy the valence three requirement. In particular, I have in mind one made up of pentagons, each pentagon with three vertices of valence 3 but two vertices of valence 4. Replacing these with little squares, we get a tiling of the torus with squares and heptagons. Who knew?

added 48 characters in body
Source Link
Will Jagy
  • 25.7k
  • 2
  • 65
  • 121

Yeah, this works, book is Topological Graph Theory by Gross and Tucker, mostly pages 216-217. First we have, on page 4, Theorem 1.1.1 by Euler, the sum of the valences is twice the number of edges. So the average valence is $\frac{2 E}{V}.$

Very much in the same vein, the sum over all the faces is twice the number of edges, so the average edges per face is $\frac{2 E}{F}.$

Your hypothesis is that the average valence is exactly three, so $$ 3 V = 2 E. $$

The Euler characteristic says $V - E + F = 0,$ or $F = E - V,$ or $$3 F = 3 E - 3 V = 3 E - 2 E = E,$$ so $6 F = 2 E$ and $$ \frac{2 E}{F} = 6. $$

There is a figure of $K_7$ on the torus on page 137, the dual would be seven hexagons. So that is the prototype, but of course you can take any large section of hexagon wallpaper and carefully place a rectangle on it to get another example. I don't know what happens if you start with a pentagon and go from there. There is also the one with octagons and squares.

Yeah, this works, book is Topological Graph Theory by Gross and Tucker, mostly pages 216-217. First we have, on page 4, Theorem 1.1.1 by Euler, the sum of the valences is twice the number of edges. So the average valence is $\frac{2 E}{V}.$

Very much in the same vein, the sum over all the faces is twice the number of edges, so the average edges per face is $\frac{2 E}{F}.$

Your hypothesis is that the average valence is exactly three, so $$ 3 V = 2 E. $$

The Euler characteristic says $V - E + F = 0,$ or $F = E - V,$ or $$3 F = 3 E - 3 V = 3 E - 2 E = E,$$ so $6 F = 2 E$ and $$ \frac{2 E}{F} = 6. $$

There is a figure of $K_7$ on the torus on page 137, the dual would be seven hexagons. So that is the prototype, but of course you can take any large section of hexagon wallpaper and carefully place a rectangle on it to get another example. I don't know what happens if you start with a pentagon and go from there.

Yeah, this works, book is Topological Graph Theory by Gross and Tucker, mostly pages 216-217. First we have, on page 4, Theorem 1.1.1 by Euler, the sum of the valences is twice the number of edges. So the average valence is $\frac{2 E}{V}.$

Very much in the same vein, the sum over all the faces is twice the number of edges, so the average edges per face is $\frac{2 E}{F}.$

Your hypothesis is that the average valence is exactly three, so $$ 3 V = 2 E. $$

The Euler characteristic says $V - E + F = 0,$ or $F = E - V,$ or $$3 F = 3 E - 3 V = 3 E - 2 E = E,$$ so $6 F = 2 E$ and $$ \frac{2 E}{F} = 6. $$

There is a figure of $K_7$ on the torus on page 137, the dual would be seven hexagons. So that is the prototype, but of course you can take any large section of hexagon wallpaper and carefully place a rectangle on it to get another example. I don't know what happens if you start with a pentagon and go from there. There is also the one with octagons and squares.

deleted 186 characters in body
Source Link
Will Jagy
  • 25.7k
  • 2
  • 65
  • 121

Yeah, this works, book is Topological Graph Theory by Gross and Tucker, mostly pages 216-217. First we have, on page 4, Theorem 1.1.1 by Euler, the sum of the valences is twice the number of edges. So the average valence is $\frac{2 E}{V}.$

Very much in the same vein, the sum over all the faces is twice the number of edges, so the average edges per face is $\frac{2 E}{F}.$

Your hypothesis is that the average valence is exactly three, so $$ 3 V = 2 E. $$

The Euler characteristic says $V - E + F = 0,$ or $F = E - V,$ or $$3 F = 3 E - 3 V = 3 E - 2 E = E,$$ so $6 F = 2 E$ and $$ \frac{2 E}{F} = 6. $$

There is a figure of $K_7$ on the torus on page 137, the dual would be seven hexagons. So that is the prototype, but of course you can take any large section of hexagon wallpaper and carefully place a rectangle on it to get another example. I don't know what happens if you start with a pentagon and go from there.

Alright, this was kind of short. See reference.

Lili Von Shtupp:

Oh, it's twue. It's twue. It's twue, it's twue!

Yeah, this works, book is Topological Graph Theory by Gross and Tucker, mostly pages 216-217. First we have, on page 4, Theorem 1.1.1 by Euler, the sum of the valences is twice the number of edges. So the average valence is $\frac{2 E}{V}.$

Very much in the same vein, the sum over all the faces is twice the number of edges, so the average edges per face is $\frac{2 E}{F}.$

Your hypothesis is that the average valence is exactly three, so $$ 3 V = 2 E. $$

The Euler characteristic says $V - E + F = 0,$ or $F = E - V,$ or $$3 F = 3 E - 3 V = 3 E - 2 E = E,$$ so $6 F = 2 E$ and $$ \frac{2 E}{F} = 6. $$

There is a figure of $K_7$ on the torus on page 137, the dual would be seven hexagons. So that is the prototype, but of course you can take any large section of hexagon wallpaper and carefully place a rectangle on it to get another example. I don't know what happens if you start with a pentagon and go from there.

Alright, this was kind of short. See reference.

Lili Von Shtupp:

Oh, it's twue. It's twue. It's twue, it's twue!

Yeah, this works, book is Topological Graph Theory by Gross and Tucker, mostly pages 216-217. First we have, on page 4, Theorem 1.1.1 by Euler, the sum of the valences is twice the number of edges. So the average valence is $\frac{2 E}{V}.$

Very much in the same vein, the sum over all the faces is twice the number of edges, so the average edges per face is $\frac{2 E}{F}.$

Your hypothesis is that the average valence is exactly three, so $$ 3 V = 2 E. $$

The Euler characteristic says $V - E + F = 0,$ or $F = E - V,$ or $$3 F = 3 E - 3 V = 3 E - 2 E = E,$$ so $6 F = 2 E$ and $$ \frac{2 E}{F} = 6. $$

There is a figure of $K_7$ on the torus on page 137, the dual would be seven hexagons. So that is the prototype, but of course you can take any large section of hexagon wallpaper and carefully place a rectangle on it to get another example. I don't know what happens if you start with a pentagon and go from there.

added 77 characters in body
Source Link
Will Jagy
  • 25.7k
  • 2
  • 65
  • 121
Loading
added 319 characters in body; added 114 characters in body
Source Link
Will Jagy
  • 25.7k
  • 2
  • 65
  • 121
Loading
Source Link
Will Jagy
  • 25.7k
  • 2
  • 65
  • 121
Loading