Skip to main content
edited title
Link
Jim Humphreys
  • 52.9k
  • 4
  • 120
  • 240

What is a canonocalcanonical set of representatives in $GL(n,F)$ for the vertices in the Bruhat Tits building?

added 112 characters in body
Source Link
Marc Palm
  • 11.2k
  • 2
  • 35
  • 92

$F$ is a non archimedean field here. To be more precise, I would actually prefer a set of representative in $B(F)$ for the discrete space $B(F) / B(o)Z(F)$?

This can be phrased also as question about lattices in $F^n$, but I would prefer to stay on the group level.

$F$ is a non archimedean field here. To be more precise, I would actually prefer a set of representative in $B(F)$ for the discrete space $B(F) / B(o)Z(F)$?

$F$ is a non archimedean field here. To be more precise, I would actually prefer a set of representative in $B(F)$ for the discrete space $B(F) / B(o)Z(F)$?

This can be phrased also as question about lattices in $F^n$, but I would prefer to stay on the group level.

Source Link
Marc Palm
  • 11.2k
  • 2
  • 35
  • 92

What is a canonocal set of representatives in $GL(n,F)$ for the vertices in the Bruhat Tits building?

$F$ is a non archimedean field here. To be more precise, I would actually prefer a set of representative in $B(F)$ for the discrete space $B(F) / B(o)Z(F)$?