Skip to main content
Commonmark migration
Source Link

I know two generalizations of Hilbert 90, but I don't if there is a statement that contains both:

The first statement

###The first statement LetLet $K$ be a field, then $H^1(Gal(K), GL_n(K^{sep}))=0$.

The second statement

###The second statement LetLet $X$ be a scheme, then $H^1(X,\mathbb{G}_m)=Pic(X)$.

Question

###Question IsIs there a nice characterization of $H^1(X,GL_n)$ (where $GL_n$ is treated as a sheaf in the etale topology) for a general scheme $X$?

I know two generalizations of Hilbert 90, but I don't if there is a statement that contains both:

###The first statement Let $K$ be a field, then $H^1(Gal(K), GL_n(K^{sep}))=0$.

###The second statement Let $X$ be a scheme, then $H^1(X,\mathbb{G}_m)=Pic(X)$.

###Question Is there a nice characterization of $H^1(X,GL_n)$ (where $GL_n$ is treated as a sheaf in the etale topology) for a general scheme $X$?

I know two generalizations of Hilbert 90, but I don't if there is a statement that contains both:

The first statement

Let $K$ be a field, then $H^1(Gal(K), GL_n(K^{sep}))=0$.

The second statement

Let $X$ be a scheme, then $H^1(X,\mathbb{G}_m)=Pic(X)$.

Question

Is there a nice characterization of $H^1(X,GL_n)$ (where $GL_n$ is treated as a sheaf in the etale topology) for a general scheme $X$?

Source Link
Makhalan Duff
  • 5.9k
  • 43
  • 80

What is the general statement of Hilbert 90?

I know two generalizations of Hilbert 90, but I don't if there is a statement that contains both:

###The first statement Let $K$ be a field, then $H^1(Gal(K), GL_n(K^{sep}))=0$.

###The second statement Let $X$ be a scheme, then $H^1(X,\mathbb{G}_m)=Pic(X)$.

###Question Is there a nice characterization of $H^1(X,GL_n)$ (where $GL_n$ is treated as a sheaf in the etale topology) for a general scheme $X$?