Stack Exchange network consists of 183 Q&A communities including Stack Overflow, the largest, most trusted online community for developers to learn, share their knowledge, and build their careers.
Is it true that every finitely generated submodule of a non-finitely generated projective over a (not necessarily commutative!) ring is contained in a proper summand?
N.B.: I asked this alreadyalready on math.stackexchange.com without much luck.
Is it true that every finitely generated submodule of a non-finitely generated projective over a (not necessarily commutative!) ring is contained in a proper summand?
N.B.: I asked this already on math.stackexchange.com without much luck.
Is it true that every finitely generated submodule of a non-finitely generated projective over a (not necessarily commutative!) ring is contained in a proper summand?
N.B.: I asked this already on math.stackexchange.com without much luck.
Is it true that every finitely generated submodule of a non-finitely generated projective over a (not necessarily commutative!) ring is contained in a proper summand?
N.B.: I asked this already on math.stackexchange.com without much luck.
