Skip to main content

Consider $X=\operatorname{Hom}(\pi,SL(2,\mathbb C))/\\!/SL(2,\mathbb C)$$X=\operatorname{Hom}(\pi,\mathrm{SL}(2,\mathbb C))/\! \!/\mathrm{SL}(2,\mathbb C)$ and $Y=\operatorname{Hom}(\pi,SU(2))/\\!/SU(2)$$Y=\operatorname{Hom}(\pi,\mathrm{SU}(2))/\mathrm{SU}(2)$, where $\pi$ is a surface group. Note that if we use the right coordinates, then $Y$ is exactly the real valued points of $X$ (for the purposes of this question, though, this is irrelevant).

For those reading the comments below, I used to use $X_{\mathbb R}$ instead of $Y$.

Since $\pi$ is a surface group, the cup product (intersection pairing) gives rise to a symplectic form $\omega$ on $Y$ (which can also be naturally viewed as a holomorphic symplectic form on $X$). Now for $f\in\Gamma(X,\mathcal O_X)$, we have a natural linear map:

$$f\mapsto \int_{Y}f\cdot\wedge^{\operatorname{top}}\omega$$

(I believe it is more or less correct to call this the Yang-Mills measure, e.g. see this paper by Bullock, Frohman, and Kania-Bartoszynska)

Question: Is there a completely algebraic description of this integral? i.e. one that just works with input $\pi$ and the algebraic group $SL(2)$$\mathrm{SL}(2)$, and avoids the notion of real and complex points?

Note: there is certainly a simple algebraic description of $\omega$, so perhaps we just need to algebraically define the homology class of $Y$ in $X$ . . .

A paper of Witten's is perhaps related (and great to read even if it isn't).

Consider $X=\operatorname{Hom}(\pi,SL(2,\mathbb C))/\\!/SL(2,\mathbb C)$ and $Y=\operatorname{Hom}(\pi,SU(2))/\\!/SU(2)$, where $\pi$ is a surface group. Note that if we use the right coordinates, then $Y$ is exactly the real valued points of $X$ (for the purposes of this question, though, this is irrelevant).

For those reading the comments below, I used to use $X_{\mathbb R}$ instead of $Y$.

Since $\pi$ is a surface group, the cup product (intersection pairing) gives rise to a symplectic form $\omega$ on $Y$ (which can also be naturally viewed as a holomorphic symplectic form on $X$). Now for $f\in\Gamma(X,\mathcal O_X)$, we have a natural linear map:

$$f\mapsto \int_{Y}f\cdot\wedge^{\operatorname{top}}\omega$$

(I believe it is more or less correct to call this the Yang-Mills measure, e.g. see this paper by Bullock, Frohman, and Kania-Bartoszynska)

Question: Is there a completely algebraic description of this integral? i.e. one that just works with input $\pi$ and the algebraic group $SL(2)$, and avoids the notion of real and complex points?

Note: there is certainly a simple algebraic description of $\omega$, so perhaps we just need to algebraically define the homology class of $Y$ in $X$ . . .

A paper of Witten's is perhaps related (and great to read even if it isn't).

Consider $X=\operatorname{Hom}(\pi,\mathrm{SL}(2,\mathbb C))/\! \!/\mathrm{SL}(2,\mathbb C)$ and $Y=\operatorname{Hom}(\pi,\mathrm{SU}(2))/\mathrm{SU}(2)$, where $\pi$ is a surface group. Note that if we use the right coordinates, then $Y$ is exactly the real valued points of $X$ (for the purposes of this question, though, this is irrelevant).

For those reading the comments below, I used to use $X_{\mathbb R}$ instead of $Y$.

Since $\pi$ is a surface group, the cup product (intersection pairing) gives rise to a symplectic form $\omega$ on $Y$ (which can also be naturally viewed as a holomorphic symplectic form on $X$). Now for $f\in\Gamma(X,\mathcal O_X)$, we have a natural linear map:

$$f\mapsto \int_{Y}f\cdot\wedge^{\operatorname{top}}\omega$$

(I believe it is more or less correct to call this the Yang-Mills measure, e.g. see this paper by Bullock, Frohman, and Kania-Bartoszynska)

Question: Is there a completely algebraic description of this integral? i.e. one that just works with input $\pi$ and the algebraic group $\mathrm{SL}(2)$, and avoids the notion of real and complex points?

Note: there is certainly a simple algebraic description of $\omega$, so perhaps we just need to algebraically define the homology class of $Y$ in $X$ . . .

A paper of Witten's is perhaps related (and great to read even if it isn't).

edited tags
Link
John Pardon
  • 18.7k
  • 3
  • 55
  • 131
deleted 23 characters in body
Source Link
John Pardon
  • 18.7k
  • 3
  • 55
  • 131

Consider $X=\operatorname{Hom}(\pi,SL(2,\mathbb C))/\\!/SL(2,\mathbb C)$ and $Y=\operatorname{Hom}(\pi,SU(2))/\\!/SU(2)$, where $\pi$ is a surface group. Note that if we use the right coordinates, then $Y$ is exactly the real valued points of $X$ (for the purposes of this question, though, this is irrelevant).

For those reading the comments below, I used to use $X_{\mathbb R}$ instead of $Y$.

Since $\pi$ is a surface group, the cup product (intersection pairing) gives rise to a symplectic form $\omega$ on $Y$ (which can also be naturally viewed as a holomorphic symplectic form on $X$). Now for $f,g\in\Gamma(X,\mathcal O_X)$$f\in\Gamma(X,\mathcal O_X)$, we have a natural bilinear pairinglinear map:

$$f\otimes g\mapsto \int_{Y}f\cdot g\cdot\wedge^{\operatorname{top}}\omega$$$$f\mapsto \int_{Y}f\cdot\wedge^{\operatorname{top}}\omega$$

(I believe it is more or less correct to call this the Yang-Mills measure, e.g. see this paper by Bullock, Frohman, and Kania-Bartoszynska)

Question: Is there a completely algebraic description of this pairingintegral? i.e. one that just works with input $\pi$ and the algebraic group $SL(2)$, and avoids the notion of real and complex points?

Note: there is certainly a simple algebraic description of $\omega$, so perhaps we just need to algebraically define the homology class of $Y$ in $X$ . . .

A paper of Witten's is perhaps related (and great to read even if it isn't).

Consider $X=\operatorname{Hom}(\pi,SL(2,\mathbb C))/\\!/SL(2,\mathbb C)$ and $Y=\operatorname{Hom}(\pi,SU(2))/\\!/SU(2)$, where $\pi$ is a surface group. Note that if we use the right coordinates, then $Y$ is exactly the real valued points of $X$ (for the purposes of this question, though, this is irrelevant).

For those reading the comments below, I used to use $X_{\mathbb R}$ instead of $Y$.

Since $\pi$ is a surface group, the cup product (intersection pairing) gives rise to a symplectic form $\omega$ on $Y$ (which can also be naturally viewed as a holomorphic symplectic form on $X$). Now for $f,g\in\Gamma(X,\mathcal O_X)$, we have a natural bilinear pairing:

$$f\otimes g\mapsto \int_{Y}f\cdot g\cdot\wedge^{\operatorname{top}}\omega$$

(I believe it is more or less correct to call this the Yang-Mills measure, e.g. see this paper by Bullock, Frohman, and Kania-Bartoszynska)

Question: Is there a completely algebraic description of this pairing? i.e. one that just works with input $\pi$ and the algebraic group $SL(2)$, and avoids the notion of real and complex points?

Note: there is certainly a simple algebraic description of $\omega$, so perhaps we just need to algebraically define the homology class of $Y$ in $X$ . . .

A paper of Witten's is perhaps related (and great to read even if it isn't).

Consider $X=\operatorname{Hom}(\pi,SL(2,\mathbb C))/\\!/SL(2,\mathbb C)$ and $Y=\operatorname{Hom}(\pi,SU(2))/\\!/SU(2)$, where $\pi$ is a surface group. Note that if we use the right coordinates, then $Y$ is exactly the real valued points of $X$ (for the purposes of this question, though, this is irrelevant).

For those reading the comments below, I used to use $X_{\mathbb R}$ instead of $Y$.

Since $\pi$ is a surface group, the cup product (intersection pairing) gives rise to a symplectic form $\omega$ on $Y$ (which can also be naturally viewed as a holomorphic symplectic form on $X$). Now for $f\in\Gamma(X,\mathcal O_X)$, we have a natural linear map:

$$f\mapsto \int_{Y}f\cdot\wedge^{\operatorname{top}}\omega$$

(I believe it is more or less correct to call this the Yang-Mills measure, e.g. see this paper by Bullock, Frohman, and Kania-Bartoszynska)

Question: Is there a completely algebraic description of this integral? i.e. one that just works with input $\pi$ and the algebraic group $SL(2)$, and avoids the notion of real and complex points?

Note: there is certainly a simple algebraic description of $\omega$, so perhaps we just need to algebraically define the homology class of $Y$ in $X$ . . .

A paper of Witten's is perhaps related (and great to read even if it isn't).

deleted 39 characters in body
Source Link
John Pardon
  • 18.7k
  • 3
  • 55
  • 131
Loading
added 130 characters in body
Source Link
John Pardon
  • 18.7k
  • 3
  • 55
  • 131
Loading
added 191 characters in body; edited title
Source Link
John Pardon
  • 18.7k
  • 3
  • 55
  • 131
Loading
Source Link
John Pardon
  • 18.7k
  • 3
  • 55
  • 131
Loading