Skip to main content
replaced http://mathoverflow.net/ with https://mathoverflow.net/
Source Link

This is a follow-up to question Completeness vs Compactness in logicCompleteness vs Compactness in logic 68788. One common theme was that compactness in logic is a purely semantic notion, so should have no need of completeness.

The definition of compactness seems to depend in an irreducible way on the concept of a sentence, which appears to be a syntactic notion. So my question is: Is there any purely semantic definition of a sentence in first-order logic?

This is a follow-up to question Completeness vs Compactness in logic 68788. One common theme was that compactness in logic is a purely semantic notion, so should have no need of completeness.

The definition of compactness seems to depend in an irreducible way on the concept of a sentence, which appears to be a syntactic notion. So my question is: Is there any purely semantic definition of a sentence in first-order logic?

This is a follow-up to question Completeness vs Compactness in logic 68788. One common theme was that compactness in logic is a purely semantic notion, so should have no need of completeness.

The definition of compactness seems to depend in an irreducible way on the concept of a sentence, which appears to be a syntactic notion. So my question is: Is there any purely semantic definition of a sentence in first-order logic?

edited tags
Link
François G. Dorais
  • 44.4k
  • 6
  • 150
  • 233
Source Link
David Harris
  • 3.5k
  • 1
  • 26
  • 38

Semantic definition of sentence

This is a follow-up to question Completeness vs Compactness in logic 68788. One common theme was that compactness in logic is a purely semantic notion, so should have no need of completeness.

The definition of compactness seems to depend in an irreducible way on the concept of a sentence, which appears to be a syntactic notion. So my question is: Is there any purely semantic definition of a sentence in first-order logic?