Skip to main content
added 384 characters in body
Source Link
Ben Webster
  • 44.7k
  • 12
  • 126
  • 260

You might want to try tilting modules. Those at least provide a generating set with trivial self-extensions.

If I recall correctly, each tilting is left and right orthogonal to all but finitely many simples, and vice-versa, and every finite-dimensional module has a finite-length tilting resolution.

That is, the derived category of finite-dimensional modular representations is derived equivalent to bounded, finite rank perfect complexes over the endomorphism ring of the tiltings.

You might want to try tilting modules. Those at least provide a generating set with trivial self-extensions.

You might want to try tilting modules. Those at least provide a generating set with trivial self-extensions.

If I recall correctly, each tilting is left and right orthogonal to all but finitely many simples, and vice-versa, and every finite-dimensional module has a finite-length tilting resolution.

That is, the derived category of finite-dimensional modular representations is derived equivalent to bounded, finite rank perfect complexes over the endomorphism ring of the tiltings.

deleted 49 characters in body
Source Link
Ben Webster
  • 44.7k
  • 12
  • 126
  • 260

don't the simple modules (or Weyl modules, orYou might want to try tilting modules) generate? am I missing something subtle about the fact that you're using the derived category?. Those at least provide a generating set with trivial self-extensions.

don't the simple modules (or Weyl modules, or tilting modules) generate? am I missing something subtle about the fact that you're using the derived category?

You might want to try tilting modules. Those at least provide a generating set with trivial self-extensions.

Source Link
Ben Webster
  • 44.7k
  • 12
  • 126
  • 260

don't the simple modules (or Weyl modules, or tilting modules) generate? am I missing something subtle about the fact that you're using the derived category?