Skip to main content
Became Hot Network Question
edited tags
Link
Noah Schweber
  • 21.1k
  • 10
  • 110
  • 331
Missing period
Source Link
LSpice
  • 12.9k
  • 4
  • 45
  • 69

I am looking for a reference to the fact that $\mathbb{Z}$ is conservatively embedded into the field $\mathbb{C}$ of complex numbers, that is anything in $\mathbb{Z}$ which is definable in $(\mathbb{C},\mathbb{Z},+,\times)$ is already definable in $(\mathbb{Z},+,\times)$.

I am looking for a reference to the fact that $\mathbb{Z}$ is conservatively embedded into the field $\mathbb{C}$ of complex numbers, that is anything in $\mathbb{Z}$ which is definable in $(\mathbb{C},\mathbb{Z},+,\times)$ is already definable in $(\mathbb{Z},+,\times)$

I am looking for a reference to the fact that $\mathbb{Z}$ is conservatively embedded into the field $\mathbb{C}$ of complex numbers, that is anything in $\mathbb{Z}$ which is definable in $(\mathbb{C},\mathbb{Z},+,\times)$ is already definable in $(\mathbb{Z},+,\times)$.

Source Link
Boris Z
  • 171
  • 2

Are integers conservatively embedded in the field of complex numbers?

I am looking for a reference to the fact that $\mathbb{Z}$ is conservatively embedded into the field $\mathbb{C}$ of complex numbers, that is anything in $\mathbb{Z}$ which is definable in $(\mathbb{C},\mathbb{Z},+,\times)$ is already definable in $(\mathbb{Z},+,\times)$