Apologies in advance if this question is too basic, I looked briefly through Weibel and the stacks project and couldn't find any relevant reference.
Let $\mathcal{A}$ denote an abelian category, and let $A,B$ be a pair of objects in $\mathcal{A}$. Let $E\in\mathrm{Ext}^1(B,A)$ fit in the exact sequence:
$$0\to A\xrightarrow{\iota}E\xrightarrow{\pi} B\to 0.$$$$0\to A\xrightarrow{\eta}E\xrightarrow{\pi} B\to 0.$$
It is well known that $E$'s inverse with respect to the Baer sum is the extension: $$0\to A\xrightarrow{-\iota}E\xrightarrow{\pi} B\to 0,$$$$0\to A\xrightarrow{-\eta}E\xrightarrow{\pi} B\to 0,$$ where the inverse is taken in $\mathrm{Hom}(A,E)$.
Since bothMore generally, for every $\mathrm{Ext}^1(B,A)$ and$n$, assuming $\mathrm{Hom}(A,E)$ are groups$A$ has no torsion, I wonder if there is more generally a homomorphism from the cyclic subgroupmultiplication by $\langle \eta\rangle \le \mathrm{Hom}(A,E)$, mapping$n$ map gives us an elementautomorphism of $n\cdot \eta$ to$A$, and its composition with $n\cdot E$$\eta$ gives us a different embedding of $A$ in $E$ with isomorphic image, wherehence, possibly a different extension.
My question is if the multiplication by $n$ on the right is taken with respect$\eta$ and multiplication by $n$ on $E$ give isomorphic extensions as seems to the Baer sumbe suggested for $n=1,0,-1$.
Thanks in advance, a reference would be highly appreciated.