Skip to main content
added 134 characters in body
Source Link
Noah B
  • 545
  • 1
  • 12

I’ve been studying the group of $\mathbb{Z}$-points of the simply connected Chevalley–Demazure group scheme of type $E_7$, denoted $G_{\text{sc}}(E_7,\mathbb{Z})$; see Vavilov and Plotkin - Chevalley groups over commutative rings: I. Elementary calculations for reference. In particular, I am interested in its first three integral homology groups. I have been able to compute the first two homology groups using various results in the literature. However, I have not found anything that helps compute the third homology group. Is there a way to compute this using results from the literature? Maybe there is a more general procedure to apply to this case as was applied in Theo Johnson-Freyd's answer to H_3 of SL(n,Z) and SL(n,F_p)?

If we can’t determine the third homology, then what can we say about it; for example, can we determine if it has 3-torsion, or it’s order?

I’ve been studying the group of $\mathbb{Z}$-points of the simply connected Chevalley–Demazure group scheme of type $E_7$, denoted $G_{\text{sc}}(E_7,\mathbb{Z})$; see Vavilov and Plotkin - Chevalley groups over commutative rings: I. Elementary calculations for reference. In particular, I am interested in its first three integral homology groups. I have been able to compute the first two homology groups using various results in the literature. However, I have not found anything that helps compute the third homology group. Is there a way to compute this using results from the literature? Maybe there is a more general procedure to apply to this case as was applied in Theo Johnson-Freyd's answer to H_3 of SL(n,Z) and SL(n,F_p)?

I’ve been studying the group of $\mathbb{Z}$-points of the simply connected Chevalley–Demazure group scheme of type $E_7$, denoted $G_{\text{sc}}(E_7,\mathbb{Z})$; see Vavilov and Plotkin - Chevalley groups over commutative rings: I. Elementary calculations for reference. In particular, I am interested in its first three integral homology groups. I have been able to compute the first two homology groups using various results in the literature. However, I have not found anything that helps compute the third homology group. Is there a way to compute this using results from the literature? Maybe there is a more general procedure to apply to this case as was applied in Theo Johnson-Freyd's answer to H_3 of SL(n,Z) and SL(n,F_p)?

If we can’t determine the third homology, then what can we say about it; for example, can we determine if it has 3-torsion, or it’s order?

Names of "here"; link to answer
Source Link
LSpice
  • 12.9k
  • 4
  • 45
  • 69

Third homology of simply connected Chevalley-DemazureChevalley–Demazure group schemes

I’ve been studying the group of $\mathbb{Z}$-points of the simply connected Chevalley-DemazureChevalley–Demazure group scheme of type $E_7$, denoted $G_{\mathrm{sc}}(E_7,\mathbb{Z})$$G_{\text{sc}}(E_7,\mathbb{Z})$; see hereVavilov and Plotkin - Chevalley groups over commutative rings: I. Elementary calculations for reference. In particular, I am interested in its first three integral homology groups. I have been able to compute the first two homology groups using various results in the literature. However, I have not found anything that helps compute the third homology group. Is there a way to compute this using results from the literature? Maybe there is a more general procedure to apply to this case as was applied in the answerTheo Johnson-Freyd's answer to hereH_3 of SL(n,Z) and SL(n,F_p)?

Third homology of simply connected Chevalley-Demazure group schemes

I’ve been studying the group of $\mathbb{Z}$-points of the simply connected Chevalley-Demazure group scheme of type $E_7$, denoted $G_{\mathrm{sc}}(E_7,\mathbb{Z})$; see here for reference. In particular, I am interested in its first three integral homology groups. I have been able to compute the first two homology groups using various results in the literature. However, I have not found anything that helps compute the third homology group. Is there a way to compute this using results from the literature? Maybe there is a more general procedure to apply to this case as was applied in the answer here?

Third homology of simply connected Chevalley–Demazure group schemes

I’ve been studying the group of $\mathbb{Z}$-points of the simply connected Chevalley–Demazure group scheme of type $E_7$, denoted $G_{\text{sc}}(E_7,\mathbb{Z})$; see Vavilov and Plotkin - Chevalley groups over commutative rings: I. Elementary calculations for reference. In particular, I am interested in its first three integral homology groups. I have been able to compute the first two homology groups using various results in the literature. However, I have not found anything that helps compute the third homology group. Is there a way to compute this using results from the literature? Maybe there is a more general procedure to apply to this case as was applied in Theo Johnson-Freyd's answer to H_3 of SL(n,Z) and SL(n,F_p)?

formatting
Source Link
YCor
  • 63.9k
  • 5
  • 187
  • 286
Loading
added 5 characters in body
Source Link
Noah B
  • 545
  • 1
  • 12
Loading
Source Link
Noah B
  • 545
  • 1
  • 12
Loading