Skip to main content
8 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Mar 13 at 21:44 vote accept Johannes
Mar 13 at 21:43 vote accept Johannes
Mar 13 at 21:44
Mar 13 at 13:57 comment added Richard Lärkäng It also seems rather over the top to call a definition obscure when it occurs in Atiyah's original paper as being equivalent to the definition he uses, see the proof of Theorem 5 in Atiyahs "Complex Analytic Connections in Fibre Bundles".
Mar 13 at 10:48 answer added Richard Lärkäng timeline score: 4
Mar 13 at 2:08 comment added Thomas Richard @Z.M Richness of geometry comes from the variety of ways a given problem can be viewed. I'm not sure judging one particular viewpoint to be "obscure" or "better" serves any purpose here. Sharing your preferences and insights is great, but maybe you could phrase in a more open way.
Mar 12 at 21:49 comment added Z. M This is a very obscure way to define the Atiyah class. A better way is defined in the same way as in stacks.math.columbia.edu/tag/09DC
S Mar 12 at 21:21 review First questions
Mar 13 at 1:40
S Mar 12 at 21:21 history asked Johannes CC BY-SA 4.0