Skip to main content
Tidying
Source Link
LSpice
  • 12.9k
  • 4
  • 45
  • 69

Comparison between two volume forms on genus zero TeichmullerTeichmüller space

Consider a sphere with $n$ punctures. If you pick a holomorphic cotangent vector at each puncture, you can canonically construct a holomorphic top form in the corresponding moduli space. (The specific construction I'm thinking of comes from string theory, but I believe that it's essentially the only thing you can write down once you fix a normalization for the Haar measure on $SL(2, \mathbb{C})$$\operatorname{SL}(2, \mathbb{C})$: just fix three points and contract the three extra cotangent vectors with the three Killing vector fields.)

Now consider the hyperbolic metric on the above sphere: since it is possible to assign coordinates $z_i$ near a cusp in a way well defined up to rotating $z_i \mapsto e^{i \theta} z_i$, one can make a volume form $\omega_S$ on the moduli space $\mathcal{M}_{0, n}$ coming from putting $dz_i \wedge d \overline{z}_i$ at each puncture. There is also the Weil-PeterssonWeil–Petersson volume form $\omega_{WP}$$\omega_\text{WP}$. Let $f = \omega_S / \omega_{WP}$$f = \omega_S / \omega_\text{WP}$.

From physical considerations, $f$ is expected to diverge near the boundary of $\mathcal{M}_{0, n}$, so let the region $R_{n, \epsilon}$ be the sub-region of $\mathcal{M}_{0, n}$ where a punctured sphere $\Sigma \in \mathcal{M}_{0, n}$ is in $R$ if $\Sigma$ has no closed geodesics of length less than $\epsilon$. Does anybody have a bound on the behavior of $\sup_{R_{n, \epsilon}} f$ as $n$ approaches infinity?

(If it helps, the actual question that leadled to this is to determine the asymptotics of $\int_{R_{n, \epsilon}} \omega_S$, where the punctures are taken to be unordered, and in particular to determine if they grow exponentially or factorially.)

Comparison between two volume forms on genus zero Teichmuller space

Consider a sphere with $n$ punctures. If you pick a holomorphic cotangent vector at each puncture, you can canonically construct a holomorphic top form in the corresponding moduli space. (The specific construction I'm thinking of comes from string theory, but I believe that it's essentially the only thing you can write down once you fix a normalization for the Haar measure on $SL(2, \mathbb{C})$: just fix three points and contract the three extra cotangent vectors with the three Killing vector fields.)

Now consider the hyperbolic metric on the above sphere: since it is possible to assign coordinates $z_i$ near a cusp in a way well defined up to rotating $z_i \mapsto e^{i \theta} z_i$, one can make a volume form $\omega_S$ on the moduli space $\mathcal{M}_{0, n}$ coming from putting $dz_i \wedge d \overline{z}_i$ at each puncture. There is also the Weil-Petersson volume form $\omega_{WP}$. Let $f = \omega_S / \omega_{WP}$.

From physical considerations, $f$ is expected to diverge near the boundary of $\mathcal{M}_{0, n}$, so let the region $R_{n, \epsilon}$ be the sub-region of $\mathcal{M}_{0, n}$ where a punctured sphere $\Sigma \in \mathcal{M}_{0, n}$ is in $R$ if $\Sigma$ has no closed geodesics of length less than $\epsilon$. Does anybody have a bound on the behavior of $\sup_{R_{n, \epsilon}} f$ as $n$ approaches infinity?

(If it helps, the actual question that lead to this is to determine the asymptotics of $\int_{R_{n, \epsilon}} \omega_S$, where the punctures are taken to be unordered, and in particular to determine if they grow exponentially or factorially.)

Comparison between two volume forms on genus zero Teichmüller space

Consider a sphere with $n$ punctures. If you pick a holomorphic cotangent vector at each puncture, you can canonically construct a holomorphic top form in the corresponding moduli space. (The specific construction I'm thinking of comes from string theory, but I believe that it's essentially the only thing you can write down once you fix a normalization for the Haar measure on $\operatorname{SL}(2, \mathbb{C})$: just fix three points and contract the three extra cotangent vectors with the three Killing vector fields.)

Now consider the hyperbolic metric on the above sphere: since it is possible to assign coordinates $z_i$ near a cusp in a way well defined up to rotating $z_i \mapsto e^{i \theta} z_i$, one can make a volume form $\omega_S$ on the moduli space $\mathcal{M}_{0, n}$ coming from putting $dz_i \wedge d \overline{z}_i$ at each puncture. There is also the Weil–Petersson volume form $\omega_\text{WP}$. Let $f = \omega_S / \omega_\text{WP}$.

From physical considerations, $f$ is expected to diverge near the boundary of $\mathcal{M}_{0, n}$, so let the region $R_{n, \epsilon}$ be the sub-region of $\mathcal{M}_{0, n}$ where a punctured sphere $\Sigma \in \mathcal{M}_{0, n}$ is in $R$ if $\Sigma$ has no closed geodesics of length less than $\epsilon$. Does anybody have a bound on the behavior of $\sup_{R_{n, \epsilon}} f$ as $n$ approaches infinity?

(If it helps, the actual question that led to this is to determine the asymptotics of $\int_{R_{n, \epsilon}} \omega_S$, where the punctures are taken to be unordered, and in particular to determine if they grow exponentially or factorially.)

Source Link

Comparison between two volume forms on genus zero Teichmuller space

Consider a sphere with $n$ punctures. If you pick a holomorphic cotangent vector at each puncture, you can canonically construct a holomorphic top form in the corresponding moduli space. (The specific construction I'm thinking of comes from string theory, but I believe that it's essentially the only thing you can write down once you fix a normalization for the Haar measure on $SL(2, \mathbb{C})$: just fix three points and contract the three extra cotangent vectors with the three Killing vector fields.)

Now consider the hyperbolic metric on the above sphere: since it is possible to assign coordinates $z_i$ near a cusp in a way well defined up to rotating $z_i \mapsto e^{i \theta} z_i$, one can make a volume form $\omega_S$ on the moduli space $\mathcal{M}_{0, n}$ coming from putting $dz_i \wedge d \overline{z}_i$ at each puncture. There is also the Weil-Petersson volume form $\omega_{WP}$. Let $f = \omega_S / \omega_{WP}$.

From physical considerations, $f$ is expected to diverge near the boundary of $\mathcal{M}_{0, n}$, so let the region $R_{n, \epsilon}$ be the sub-region of $\mathcal{M}_{0, n}$ where a punctured sphere $\Sigma \in \mathcal{M}_{0, n}$ is in $R$ if $\Sigma$ has no closed geodesics of length less than $\epsilon$. Does anybody have a bound on the behavior of $\sup_{R_{n, \epsilon}} f$ as $n$ approaches infinity?

(If it helps, the actual question that lead to this is to determine the asymptotics of $\int_{R_{n, \epsilon}} \omega_S$, where the punctures are taken to be unordered, and in particular to determine if they grow exponentially or factorially.)