Skip to main content
added 120 characters in body
Source Link
Mikhail Katz
  • 16.6k
  • 2
  • 54
  • 127

The Fubini-Study 2-form $\alpha$ on complex projective space is a calibrating form in the sense that it evaluates to 1 on every complex direction, and is less than 1 on all other real 2-dimensional directions. Therefore integration of $\alpha$ over any complex curve will give precisely the area of the curve, whereas for any embedded Riemann surface, the integral will provide a lower bound for the area. This technique is applied very often in Riemannian geometry, following Marcel Berger and Mikhael Gromov after him.

Since the integral is a homology invariant by Stokes, the area is proportional to the degree of the algebraic curve.

The Fubini-Study 2-form $\alpha$ on complex projective space is a calibrating form in the sense that it evaluates to 1 on every complex direction, and is less than 1 on all other real 2-dimensional directions. Therefore integration of $\alpha$ over any complex curve will give precisely the area of the curve, whereas for any embedded Riemann surface, the integral will provide a lower bound for the area. This technique is applied very often in Riemannian geometry, following Marcel Berger and Mikhael Gromov after him.

The Fubini-Study 2-form $\alpha$ on complex projective space is a calibrating form in the sense that it evaluates to 1 on every complex direction, and is less than 1 on all other real 2-dimensional directions. Therefore integration of $\alpha$ over any complex curve will give precisely the area of the curve, whereas for any embedded Riemann surface, the integral will provide a lower bound for the area. This technique is applied very often in Riemannian geometry, following Marcel Berger and Mikhael Gromov after him.

Since the integral is a homology invariant by Stokes, the area is proportional to the degree of the algebraic curve.

Source Link
Mikhail Katz
  • 16.6k
  • 2
  • 54
  • 127

The Fubini-Study 2-form $\alpha$ on complex projective space is a calibrating form in the sense that it evaluates to 1 on every complex direction, and is less than 1 on all other real 2-dimensional directions. Therefore integration of $\alpha$ over any complex curve will give precisely the area of the curve, whereas for any embedded Riemann surface, the integral will provide a lower bound for the area. This technique is applied very often in Riemannian geometry, following Marcel Berger and Mikhael Gromov after him.