Skip to main content
added 3 characters in body
Source Link
No-one
  • 1.1k
  • 4
  • 18

Let $E\subset \mathbb{R}^n$ be a (measurable) subset with $\mathcal{H}^{n-1}(E)=0$, where $\mathcal H^{n - 1}$ is the ($n - 1$)-dimensional Hausdorff measure. I want to know if $\mathbb{R}^n\setminus E$ must be connected (even path-connected?).

I am only aware of a proof in the case when $\mathcal{H}^{n-2}(E)=0$ (which can be found in the appendix of Simon and Wickramasekera - A Frequency Function and Singular Set Bounds for Branched Minimal Immersions), in which case the conclusion can be strengthened to saysaying that $\mathbb{R}^n\setminus E$ is simply connected.

Let $E\subset \mathbb{R}^n$ be a (measurable) subset with $\mathcal{H}^{n-1}(E)=0$, where $\mathcal H^{n - 1}$ is the ($n - 1$)-dimensional Hausdorff measure. I want to know if $\mathbb{R}^n\setminus E$ must be connected (even path-connected?).

I am only aware of a proof in the case when $\mathcal{H}^{n-2}(E)=0$ (which can be found in the appendix of Simon and Wickramasekera - A Frequency Function and Singular Set Bounds for Branched Minimal Immersions), in which case the conclusion can be strengthened to say that $\mathbb{R}^n\setminus E$ is simply connected.

Let $E\subset \mathbb{R}^n$ be a (measurable) subset with $\mathcal{H}^{n-1}(E)=0$, where $\mathcal H^{n - 1}$ is the ($n - 1$)-dimensional Hausdorff measure. I want to know if $\mathbb{R}^n\setminus E$ must be connected (even path-connected?).

I am only aware of a proof in the case when $\mathcal{H}^{n-2}(E)=0$ (which can be found in the appendix of Simon and Wickramasekera - A Frequency Function and Singular Set Bounds for Branched Minimal Immersions), in which case the conclusion can be strengthened to saying that $\mathbb{R}^n\setminus E$ is simply connected.

Name of "this paper"
Source Link
LSpice
  • 12.9k
  • 4
  • 45
  • 69

Let $E\subset \mathbb{R}^n$ be a (measurable) subset with $\mathcal{H}^{n-1}(E)=0$, where $\mathcal H^{n - 1}$ is the ($n - 1$)-dimensional Hausdorff measure. I want to know if $\mathbb{R}^n\setminus E$ must be connected (even path-connected?).

I am only aware of a proof in the case when $\mathcal{H}^{n-2}(E)=0$ (which can be found in the appendix of this paperSimon and Wickramasekera - A Frequency Function and Singular Set Bounds for Branched Minimal Immersions), in which case the conclusion can be strengthened to say that $\mathbb{R}^n\setminus E$ is simply connected.

Let $E\subset \mathbb{R}^n$ be a (measurable) subset with $\mathcal{H}^{n-1}(E)=0$. I want to know if $\mathbb{R}^n\setminus E$ must be connected (even path-connected?).

I am only aware of a proof in the case when $\mathcal{H}^{n-2}(E)=0$ (which can be found in the appendix of this paper), in which case the conclusion can be strengthened to say that $\mathbb{R}^n\setminus E$ is simply connected.

Let $E\subset \mathbb{R}^n$ be a (measurable) subset with $\mathcal{H}^{n-1}(E)=0$, where $\mathcal H^{n - 1}$ is the ($n - 1$)-dimensional Hausdorff measure. I want to know if $\mathbb{R}^n\setminus E$ must be connected (even path-connected?).

I am only aware of a proof in the case when $\mathcal{H}^{n-2}(E)=0$ (which can be found in the appendix of Simon and Wickramasekera - A Frequency Function and Singular Set Bounds for Branched Minimal Immersions), in which case the conclusion can be strengthened to say that $\mathbb{R}^n\setminus E$ is simply connected.

Source Link
No-one
  • 1.1k
  • 4
  • 18
Loading