Skip to main content
Minor formatting
Source Link
Daniele Tampieri
  • 6.4k
  • 7
  • 30
  • 45

In physics, the displacement field satisfies Gauss's theorem: $\int_{\partial \Omega} {\bf D}\ {\bf n} dS = \int_{\Omega} \rho$,$$ \int_{\partial \Omega} {\bf D}\ {\bf n}\operatorname{d\!}S = \int_{\Omega} \rho\operatorname{d\!}V, $$ where $\Omega$ is a bounded connected set with smooth boundary $\partial \Omega$, and $\rho$ is a distribution of charge. This

  • $\Omega$ is a bounded connected set with smooth boundary $\partial \Omega$, and
  • $\rho$ is a distribution of charge.

This formulation is more general than the local Maxwell formulation, as the field $\bf D$ may be not differentiable in the classic sense. It follows in particular that the field $\bf D$ must be integrable on every smooth bounded surface of $\bf R^3$.

q 1: How to characterize a vector field $\bf D\in \mathbb R^3$ which satisfies Gauss's theorem, for $\rho$ smooth?

q 2: If the required characterization turns out to be difficult, could such a $\bf D$ be shown to be essentially continuous ? weakly differentiable ? other property ?

In physics, the displacement field satisfies Gauss's theorem: $\int_{\partial \Omega} {\bf D}\ {\bf n} dS = \int_{\Omega} \rho$, where $\Omega$ is a bounded connected set with smooth boundary $\partial \Omega$, and $\rho$ is a distribution of charge. This formulation is more general than the local Maxwell formulation, as the field $\bf D$ may be not differentiable in the classic sense. It follows in particular that the field $\bf D$ must be integrable on every smooth bounded surface of $\bf R^3$.

q 1: How to characterize a vector field $\bf D\in \mathbb R^3$ which satisfies Gauss's theorem, for $\rho$ smooth?

q 2: If the required characterization turns out to be difficult, could such a $\bf D$ be shown to be essentially continuous ? weakly differentiable ? other property ?

In physics, the displacement field satisfies Gauss's theorem: $$ \int_{\partial \Omega} {\bf D}\ {\bf n}\operatorname{d\!}S = \int_{\Omega} \rho\operatorname{d\!}V, $$ where

  • $\Omega$ is a bounded connected set with smooth boundary $\partial \Omega$, and
  • $\rho$ is a distribution of charge.

This formulation is more general than the local Maxwell formulation, as the field $\bf D$ may be not differentiable in the classic sense. It follows in particular that the field $\bf D$ must be integrable on every smooth bounded surface of $\bf R^3$.

q 1: How to characterize a vector field $\bf D\in \mathbb R^3$ which satisfies Gauss's theorem, for $\rho$ smooth?

q 2: If the required characterization turns out to be difficult, could such a $\bf D$ be shown to be essentially continuous ? weakly differentiable ? other property ?

Became Hot Network Question
added 12 characters in body
Source Link
MikeTeX
  • 687
  • 3
  • 12

In physics, the displacement field satisfies Gauss's theorem: $\int_{\partial \Omega} {\bf D}\ {\bf n} dS = \int_{\Omega} \rho$, where $\Omega$ is a bounded connected set with smooth boundary $\partial \Omega$, and $\rho$ is a distribution of charge. This formulation is more general than the local Maxwell formulation, as the field $\bf D$ may be not differentiable in the classic sense. It follows in particular that the field $\bf D$ must be integrable on every smooth bounded surface of $\bf R^3$.

q 1: How to characterize a vector field $\bf D\in \mathbb R^3$ which satisfies Gauss's theorem, for $\rho$ smooth?

q 2: If the required characterization turns out to be difficult, could such a $\bf D$ be shown to be essentially continuous ? weakly differentiable ? other property ?

In physics, the displacement field satisfies Gauss's theorem: $\int_{\partial \Omega} {\bf D}\ {\bf n} dS = \int_{\Omega} \rho$, where $\Omega$ is a bounded connected set with smooth boundary $\partial \Omega$, and $\rho$ is a distribution of charge. This formulation is more general than the local Maxwell formulation, as the field $\bf D$ may be not differentiable in the classic sense. It follows in particular that the field $\bf D$ must be integrable on every smooth bounded surface of $\bf R^3$.

q 1: How to characterize a vector field $\bf D\in \mathbb R^3$ which satisfies Gauss's theorem, for $\rho$ smooth?

q 2: If the required characterization turns out to be difficult, could such a $\bf D$ be shown to be continuous ? weakly differentiable ? other property ?

In physics, the displacement field satisfies Gauss's theorem: $\int_{\partial \Omega} {\bf D}\ {\bf n} dS = \int_{\Omega} \rho$, where $\Omega$ is a bounded connected set with smooth boundary $\partial \Omega$, and $\rho$ is a distribution of charge. This formulation is more general than the local Maxwell formulation, as the field $\bf D$ may be not differentiable in the classic sense. It follows in particular that the field $\bf D$ must be integrable on every smooth bounded surface of $\bf R^3$.

q 1: How to characterize a vector field $\bf D\in \mathbb R^3$ which satisfies Gauss's theorem, for $\rho$ smooth?

q 2: If the required characterization turns out to be difficult, could such a $\bf D$ be shown to be essentially continuous ? weakly differentiable ? other property ?

Source Link
MikeTeX
  • 687
  • 3
  • 12

Properties of the displacement field, assuming only smooth charge distribution and Gauss's theorem

In physics, the displacement field satisfies Gauss's theorem: $\int_{\partial \Omega} {\bf D}\ {\bf n} dS = \int_{\Omega} \rho$, where $\Omega$ is a bounded connected set with smooth boundary $\partial \Omega$, and $\rho$ is a distribution of charge. This formulation is more general than the local Maxwell formulation, as the field $\bf D$ may be not differentiable in the classic sense. It follows in particular that the field $\bf D$ must be integrable on every smooth bounded surface of $\bf R^3$.

q 1: How to characterize a vector field $\bf D\in \mathbb R^3$ which satisfies Gauss's theorem, for $\rho$ smooth?

q 2: If the required characterization turns out to be difficult, could such a $\bf D$ be shown to be continuous ? weakly differentiable ? other property ?