Skip to main content
spelling, formatting
Source Link
Ben McKay
  • 26.3k
  • 7
  • 67
  • 102

Is arbitrary union of closed balls in R^$\mathbb{NR}^n$ Lebesgue measurable?

Is an arbitrary union of non-trivial closed balls in the Euclidean space $\mathbb R^{N}$$\mathbb{R}^n$ Lebesgue measurable? If so, is it a Borel set?

@George

I still have two questions concerning your sketch of proof.

First, how can you guanranteeguarantee each of the open balls in the countable union has radius greater than or equal to 1?

Second, I don't know how to use convexity to prove $\mu (B') \leq (1+\epsilon)^{N}\mu(B)$

Is arbitrary union of closed balls in R^{N} Lebesgue measurable?

Is an arbitrary union of non-trivial closed balls in the Euclidean space $\mathbb R^{N}$ Lebesgue measurable? If so, is it a Borel set?

@George

I still have two questions concerning your sketch of proof.

First, how can you guanrantee each of the open balls in the countable union has radius greater than or equal to 1?

Second, I don't know how to use convexity to prove $\mu (B') \leq (1+\epsilon)^{N}\mu(B)$

Is arbitrary union of closed balls in $\mathbb{R}^n$ Lebesgue measurable?

Is an arbitrary union of non-trivial closed balls in the Euclidean space $\mathbb{R}^n$ Lebesgue measurable? If so, is it a Borel set?

@George

I still have two questions concerning your sketch of proof.

First, how can you guarantee each of the open balls in the countable union has radius greater than or equal to 1?

Second, I don't know how to use convexity to prove $\mu (B') \leq (1+\epsilon)^{N}\mu(B)$

added 285 characters in body
Source Link
CKD
  • 373
  • 3
  • 6

Is an arbitrary union of non-trivial closed balls in the Euclidean space $\mathbb R^{N}$ Lebesgue measurable? If so, is it a Borel set?

@George

I still have two questions concerning your sketch of proof.

First, how can you guanrantee each of the open balls in the countable union has radius greater than or equal to 1?

Second, I don't know how to use convexity to prove $\mu (B') \leq (1+\epsilon)^{N}\mu(B)$

Is an arbitrary union of non-trivial closed balls in the Euclidean space $\mathbb R^{N}$ Lebesgue measurable? If so, is it a Borel set?

Is an arbitrary union of non-trivial closed balls in the Euclidean space $\mathbb R^{N}$ Lebesgue measurable? If so, is it a Borel set?

@George

I still have two questions concerning your sketch of proof.

First, how can you guanrantee each of the open balls in the countable union has radius greater than or equal to 1?

Second, I don't know how to use convexity to prove $\mu (B') \leq (1+\epsilon)^{N}\mu(B)$

added 10 characters in body; edited tags
Source Link
Andrey Rekalo
  • 22.3k
  • 12
  • 89
  • 122

Is an arbitrary union of non-trivial closed balls in the Euclidean space R^{N}$\mathbb R^{N}$ Lebesgue measurable? If so, is it a Borel set?

Is an arbitrary union of non-trivial closed balls in the Euclidean space R^{N} Lebesgue measurable? If so, is it a Borel set?

Is an arbitrary union of non-trivial closed balls in the Euclidean space $\mathbb R^{N}$ Lebesgue measurable? If so, is it a Borel set?

added 32 characters in body
Source Link
CKD
  • 373
  • 3
  • 6
Loading
Source Link
CKD
  • 373
  • 3
  • 6
Loading