Skip to main content
MathJax
Source Link
user9072
user9072

Let \mathfrak{g} http://latex.mathoverflow.net/png?%5Cmathfrak%7Bg%7D$\mathfrak{g}$ be a finite dimensional Lie algebra over k$k$, let U$U$ be its enveloping algebra, and let M$M$ be a \mathfrak{g} http://latex.mathoverflow.net/png?%5Cmathfrak%7Bg%7D$\mathfrak{g}$-module (not necessarily finite dimensional). Call the invariant dimension of M$M$ the largest i$i$ such that Ext^i_U(k,M)\neq 0 http://latex.mathoverflow.net/png?Ext%5Ei%5FU%28k%2CM%29%5Cneq%200$\operatorname{Ext}^i_U(k,M)\neq 0$. This is the same as the degree of the largest non-vanishing Lie algebra cohomology group.

Here are two equivalent statements of my question.

  1. If M$M$ is a cyclic \mathfrak{g} http://latex.mathoverflow.net/png?%5Cmathfrak%7Bg%7D$\mathfrak{g}$-module (that is, its generated by a single element as a U$U$-module), then is the number of relations of M$M$ always greater than the invariant dimension minus 1$1$?
  2. If I$I$ is a left ideal in U$U$, then is the number of generators of I always greater than the invariant dimension?

The reason why I would suspect such a thing is that it is true in the case of an abelian Lie algebra; that is, when U$U$ is a polynomial ring. In this case, the invariant dimension of an ideal I$I$ coincides with the height of I$I$, and so (2) becomes Krull's height theorem (and (1) follows immediately from (2)).

Let \mathfrak{g} http://latex.mathoverflow.net/png?%5Cmathfrak%7Bg%7D be a finite dimensional Lie algebra over k, let U be its enveloping algebra, and let M be a \mathfrak{g} http://latex.mathoverflow.net/png?%5Cmathfrak%7Bg%7D-module (not necessarily finite dimensional). Call the invariant dimension of M the largest i such that Ext^i_U(k,M)\neq 0 http://latex.mathoverflow.net/png?Ext%5Ei%5FU%28k%2CM%29%5Cneq%200. This is the same as the degree of the largest non-vanishing Lie algebra cohomology group.

Here are two equivalent statements of my question.

  1. If M is a cyclic \mathfrak{g} http://latex.mathoverflow.net/png?%5Cmathfrak%7Bg%7D-module (that is, its generated by a single element as a U-module), then is the number of relations of M always greater than the invariant dimension minus 1?
  2. If I is a left ideal in U, then is the number of generators of I always greater than the invariant dimension?

The reason why I would suspect such a thing is that it is true in the case of an abelian Lie algebra; that is, when U is a polynomial ring. In this case, the invariant dimension of an ideal I coincides with the height of I, and so (2) becomes Krull's height theorem (and (1) follows immediately from (2)).

Let $\mathfrak{g}$ be a finite dimensional Lie algebra over $k$, let $U$ be its enveloping algebra, and let $M$ be a $\mathfrak{g}$-module (not necessarily finite dimensional). Call the invariant dimension of $M$ the largest $i$ such that $\operatorname{Ext}^i_U(k,M)\neq 0$. This is the same as the degree of the largest non-vanishing Lie algebra cohomology group.

Here are two equivalent statements of my question.

  1. If $M$ is a cyclic $\mathfrak{g}$-module (that is, its generated by a single element as a $U$-module), then is the number of relations of $M$ always greater than the invariant dimension minus $1$?
  2. If $I$ is a left ideal in $U$, then is the number of generators of I always greater than the invariant dimension?

The reason why I would suspect such a thing is that it is true in the case of an abelian Lie algebra; that is, when $U$ is a polynomial ring. In this case, the invariant dimension of an ideal $I$ coincides with the height of $I$, and so (2) becomes Krull's height theorem (and (1) follows immediately from (2)).

retag
Link
Kim Morrison
  • 7.8k
  • 7
  • 48
  • 75
added 91 characters in body
Source Link
Greg Muller
  • 13k
  • 7
  • 53
  • 79

Let \mathfrak{g} http://latex.mathoverflow.net/png?%5Cmathfrak%7Bg%7D be a finite dimensional Lie algebra over k, let U be its enveloping algebra, and let M be a \mathfrak{g} http://latex.mathoverflow.net/png?%5Cmathfrak%7Bg%7D-module (not necessarily finite dimensional). Call the invariant dimension of M the largest i such that Ext^i_U(k,M)\neq 0 http://latex.mathoverflow.net/png?Ext%5Ei%5FU%28k%2CM%29%5Cneq%200. This is the same as the degree of the largest non-vanishing Lie algebra cohomology group.

Here are two equivalent statements of my question.

  1. If M is a cyclic \mathfrak{g} http://latex.mathoverflow.net/png?%5Cmathfrak%7Bg%7D-module (that is, its generated by a single element as a U-module), then is the number of relations of M always greater than the invariant dimension minus 1?
  2. If I is a left ideal in U, then is the number of generators of I always greater than the invariant dimension?

The reason why I would suspect such a thing is that it is true in the case of an abelian Lie algebra; that is, when U is a polynomial ring. In this case, the invariant dimension of an ideal I coincides with the height of I, and so (2) becomes Krull's height theorem (and (1) follows immediately from (2)).

Let \mathfrak{g} http://latex.mathoverflow.net/png?%5Cmathfrak%7Bg%7D be a finite dimensional Lie algebra over k, let U be its enveloping algebra, and let M be a \mathfrak{g} http://latex.mathoverflow.net/png?%5Cmathfrak%7Bg%7D-module (not necessarily finite dimensional). Call the invariant dimension of M the largest i such that Ext^i_U(k,M)\neq 0 http://latex.mathoverflow.net/png?Ext%5Ei%5FU%28k%2CM%29%5Cneq%200.

Here are two equivalent statements of my question.

  1. If M is a cyclic \mathfrak{g} http://latex.mathoverflow.net/png?%5Cmathfrak%7Bg%7D-module (that is, its generated by a single element as a U-module), then is the number of relations of M always greater than the invariant dimension minus 1?
  2. If I is a left ideal in U, then is the number of generators of I always greater than the invariant dimension?

The reason why I would suspect such a thing is that it is true in the case of an abelian Lie algebra; that is, when U is a polynomial ring. In this case, the invariant dimension of an ideal I coincides with the height of I, and so (2) becomes Krull's height theorem (and (1) follows immediately from (2)).

Let \mathfrak{g} http://latex.mathoverflow.net/png?%5Cmathfrak%7Bg%7D be a finite dimensional Lie algebra over k, let U be its enveloping algebra, and let M be a \mathfrak{g} http://latex.mathoverflow.net/png?%5Cmathfrak%7Bg%7D-module (not necessarily finite dimensional). Call the invariant dimension of M the largest i such that Ext^i_U(k,M)\neq 0 http://latex.mathoverflow.net/png?Ext%5Ei%5FU%28k%2CM%29%5Cneq%200. This is the same as the degree of the largest non-vanishing Lie algebra cohomology group.

Here are two equivalent statements of my question.

  1. If M is a cyclic \mathfrak{g} http://latex.mathoverflow.net/png?%5Cmathfrak%7Bg%7D-module (that is, its generated by a single element as a U-module), then is the number of relations of M always greater than the invariant dimension minus 1?
  2. If I is a left ideal in U, then is the number of generators of I always greater than the invariant dimension?

The reason why I would suspect such a thing is that it is true in the case of an abelian Lie algebra; that is, when U is a polynomial ring. In this case, the invariant dimension of an ideal I coincides with the height of I, and so (2) becomes Krull's height theorem (and (1) follows immediately from (2)).

Source Link
Greg Muller
  • 13k
  • 7
  • 53
  • 79
Loading