Skip to main content
`\operatorname`, `\bigotimes`, and backwards apostrophe
Source Link
LSpice
  • 13k
  • 4
  • 45
  • 69

Let $F$ be a number field. For an irreducible cuspidal automorphic representation $\pi$ of $\operatorname{GL}_n(\mathbb{A}_F)$, we say that $\pi$ is symplectic (or orthogonal) if $L(s,\pi,\wedge^{2})$$L(s,\pi,\bigwedge^{2})$ (or $L(s,\pi,Sym^2)$$L(s,\pi,\operatorname{Sym}^2)$) has a pole at $s=1$.

I am wondering thatwhether if $\pi=\otimes \pi_v$$\pi=\bigotimes \pi_v$ is symplectic (or orthogonal), then $\pi_v$‘s’s are also symplectic (or orthogonal) for all places $v$?

(Here, $\pi_v$ is symplectic (or orthogonal) means that its corresponding Weil-DelignWeil–Deligne group representation by local Langlands correspondence is of such type.)

Any comments are welcome!

Let $F$ be a number field. For an irreducible cuspidal automorphic representation $\pi$ of $\operatorname{GL}_n(\mathbb{A}_F)$, we say that $\pi$ is symplectic (or orthogonal) if $L(s,\pi,\wedge^{2})$ (or $L(s,\pi,Sym^2)$) has a pole at $s=1$.

I am wondering that if $\pi=\otimes \pi_v$ is symplectic (or orthogonal), then $\pi_v$‘s are also symplectic (or orthogonal) for all places $v$?

(Here, $\pi_v$ is symplectic (or orthogonal) means that its corresponding Weil-Delign group representation by local Langlands correspondence is such type.)

Any comments are welcome!

Let $F$ be a number field. For an irreducible cuspidal automorphic representation $\pi$ of $\operatorname{GL}_n(\mathbb{A}_F)$, we say that $\pi$ is symplectic (or orthogonal) if $L(s,\pi,\bigwedge^{2})$ (or $L(s,\pi,\operatorname{Sym}^2)$) has a pole at $s=1$.

I am wondering whether if $\pi=\bigotimes \pi_v$ is symplectic (or orthogonal), then $\pi_v$’s are also symplectic (or orthogonal) for all places $v$?

(Here, $\pi_v$ is symplectic (or orthogonal) means that its corresponding Weil–Deligne group representation by local Langlands correspondence is of such type.)

Any comments are welcome!

edited title
Link
Andrew
  • 1k
  • 7
  • 9

Global symplectic (orthogonal) type of automorphic representation compels its type forto all its local components?

Source Link
Andrew
  • 1k
  • 7
  • 9

Global symplectic (orthogonal) type of automorphic representation compels type for all its local components?

Let $F$ be a number field. For an irreducible cuspidal automorphic representation $\pi$ of $\operatorname{GL}_n(\mathbb{A}_F)$, we say that $\pi$ is symplectic (or orthogonal) if $L(s,\pi,\wedge^{2})$ (or $L(s,\pi,Sym^2)$) has a pole at $s=1$.

I am wondering that if $\pi=\otimes \pi_v$ is symplectic (or orthogonal), then $\pi_v$‘s are also symplectic (or orthogonal) for all places $v$?

(Here, $\pi_v$ is symplectic (or orthogonal) means that its corresponding Weil-Delign group representation by local Langlands correspondence is such type.)

Any comments are welcome!