Skip to main content
deleted 1 character in body
Source Link

Recently, I am learning Schauder estimates for elliptic equations and I come across a proposition as follows\follows

Let $ \alpha\in (0,1) $ and $ \Omega $ be a bounded $ C^2(\Omega) $ domain on $ \mathbb{R}^n $, let $ u\in C^{2,\alpha}(\Omega) $ be a weak solution to \begin{eqnarray} \Delta u&=&f \text{ in }\Omega\\ u&=&g\text{ on }\partial\Omega, \end{eqnarray} for $ f\in C^{0,\alpha}(\Omega) $ and $ g\in C^{0,\alpha}(\partial\Omega) $. Then
\begin{eqnarray} \left\|u\right\|_{C^{2,\alpha}(\Omega)}\leq C\left(\left\|f\right\|_{C^{0,\alpha}(\Omega)}+\left\|g\right\|_{C^{2,\alpha}(\partial\Omega)}\right), \end{eqnarray} for some constant $ C $ depending only on $ \alpha, n, $ and $ \Omega $.

This proposition is a boundary estimates for the solution. I want to prove it and here is my try. First I notice that the estimate can be decomposed to two parts, the interior part and the boundary parts. That is, if we can prove that for all $ x_0\in \partial \Omega $, there exists a ball $ B(x_0,r) $ with radius $ r>0 $, center $ x_0 $ and a constant $ C $ depending only on $ \alpha, n, $ and $ \Omega $ such that \begin{eqnarray} \left\|u\right\|_{C^{2,\alpha}(B(x_0,r/2)\cap\Omega)}\leq C\left(\left\|f\right\|_{C^{0,\alpha}(B(x_0,r/2)\cap\Omega)}+\left\|g\right\|_{C^{2,\alpha}(B(x_0,r/2)\cap\partial\Omega)}\right),(*) \end{eqnarray} I can use the property that $ \partial\Omega $ is compact and construct a finite covering $ \left\{B(x_i,r_i)\right\}_{i=1}^{N} $ for $ \partial\Omega $. Then I can choose $ K $ which is a compact subset of $ \Omega $ and $ \operatorname{dist}(K,\partial\Omega)>0 $ such that $ \Omega\subset\cup_{i}^{N}B(x_i,r_i)\cup K $. By using the classical Schauder estimates on $ K $, I can obtain that \begin{eqnarray} \left\|u\right\|_{C^{2,\alpha}(K)}\leq C\left(\left\|f\right\|_{C^{0,\alpha}(\Omega)}+\left\|u\right\|_{L^{\infty}(\Omega)}\right), \end{eqnarray} where $ C $ is a constant depending only on $ n, K, \Omega $ and $ \alpha $. We can directly obtain \begin{eqnarray} \left\|u\right\|_{C^{2,\alpha}(K)}\leq C\left(\left\|f\right\|_{C^{0,\alpha}(\Omega)}+\left\|g\right\|_{C^{0,\alpha}(\partial\Omega)}\right), \end{eqnarray} by using the maximum principle for laplacian. However I have some trouble in getting the boundary estimate (*). In the book "Regularity Theory for Elliptic PDE" written by Fernandez-Real, the author give a instruction we should use the blow up method and use the Liouville's theorem in the half-space, I tried but failed at some details. Can you give me some hints on dealing with the boundary terms or give me some references on it?

Recently, I am learning Schauder estimates for elliptic equations and I come across a proposition as follows\

Let $ \alpha\in (0,1) $ and $ \Omega $ be a bounded $ C^2(\Omega) $ domain on $ \mathbb{R}^n $, let $ u\in C^{2,\alpha}(\Omega) $ be a weak solution to \begin{eqnarray} \Delta u&=&f \text{ in }\Omega\\ u&=&g\text{ on }\partial\Omega, \end{eqnarray} for $ f\in C^{0,\alpha}(\Omega) $ and $ g\in C^{0,\alpha}(\partial\Omega) $. Then
\begin{eqnarray} \left\|u\right\|_{C^{2,\alpha}(\Omega)}\leq C\left(\left\|f\right\|_{C^{0,\alpha}(\Omega)}+\left\|g\right\|_{C^{2,\alpha}(\partial\Omega)}\right), \end{eqnarray} for some constant $ C $ depending only on $ \alpha, n, $ and $ \Omega $.

This proposition is a boundary estimates for the solution. I want to prove it and here is my try. First I notice that the estimate can be decomposed to two parts, the interior part and the boundary parts. That is, if we can prove that for all $ x_0\in \partial \Omega $, there exists a ball $ B(x_0,r) $ with radius $ r>0 $, center $ x_0 $ and a constant $ C $ depending only on $ \alpha, n, $ and $ \Omega $ such that \begin{eqnarray} \left\|u\right\|_{C^{2,\alpha}(B(x_0,r/2)\cap\Omega)}\leq C\left(\left\|f\right\|_{C^{0,\alpha}(B(x_0,r/2)\cap\Omega)}+\left\|g\right\|_{C^{2,\alpha}(B(x_0,r/2)\cap\partial\Omega)}\right),(*) \end{eqnarray} I can use the property that $ \partial\Omega $ is compact and construct a finite covering $ \left\{B(x_i,r_i)\right\}_{i=1}^{N} $ for $ \partial\Omega $. Then I can choose $ K $ which is a compact subset of $ \Omega $ and $ \operatorname{dist}(K,\partial\Omega)>0 $ such that $ \Omega\subset\cup_{i}^{N}B(x_i,r_i)\cup K $. By using the classical Schauder estimates on $ K $, I can obtain that \begin{eqnarray} \left\|u\right\|_{C^{2,\alpha}(K)}\leq C\left(\left\|f\right\|_{C^{0,\alpha}(\Omega)}+\left\|u\right\|_{L^{\infty}(\Omega)}\right), \end{eqnarray} where $ C $ is a constant depending only on $ n, K, \Omega $ and $ \alpha $. We can directly obtain \begin{eqnarray} \left\|u\right\|_{C^{2,\alpha}(K)}\leq C\left(\left\|f\right\|_{C^{0,\alpha}(\Omega)}+\left\|g\right\|_{C^{0,\alpha}(\partial\Omega)}\right), \end{eqnarray} by using the maximum principle for laplacian. However I have some trouble in getting the boundary estimate (*). In the book "Regularity Theory for Elliptic PDE" written by Fernandez-Real, the author give a instruction we should use the blow up method and use the Liouville's theorem in the half-space, I tried but failed at some details. Can you give me some hints on dealing with the boundary terms or give me some references on it?

Recently, I am learning Schauder estimates for elliptic equations and I come across a proposition as follows

Let $ \alpha\in (0,1) $ and $ \Omega $ be a bounded $ C^2(\Omega) $ domain on $ \mathbb{R}^n $, let $ u\in C^{2,\alpha}(\Omega) $ be a weak solution to \begin{eqnarray} \Delta u&=&f \text{ in }\Omega\\ u&=&g\text{ on }\partial\Omega, \end{eqnarray} for $ f\in C^{0,\alpha}(\Omega) $ and $ g\in C^{0,\alpha}(\partial\Omega) $. Then
\begin{eqnarray} \left\|u\right\|_{C^{2,\alpha}(\Omega)}\leq C\left(\left\|f\right\|_{C^{0,\alpha}(\Omega)}+\left\|g\right\|_{C^{2,\alpha}(\partial\Omega)}\right), \end{eqnarray} for some constant $ C $ depending only on $ \alpha, n, $ and $ \Omega $.

This proposition is a boundary estimates for the solution. I want to prove it and here is my try. First I notice that the estimate can be decomposed to two parts, the interior part and the boundary parts. That is, if we can prove that for all $ x_0\in \partial \Omega $, there exists a ball $ B(x_0,r) $ with radius $ r>0 $, center $ x_0 $ and a constant $ C $ depending only on $ \alpha, n, $ and $ \Omega $ such that \begin{eqnarray} \left\|u\right\|_{C^{2,\alpha}(B(x_0,r/2)\cap\Omega)}\leq C\left(\left\|f\right\|_{C^{0,\alpha}(B(x_0,r/2)\cap\Omega)}+\left\|g\right\|_{C^{2,\alpha}(B(x_0,r/2)\cap\partial\Omega)}\right),(*) \end{eqnarray} I can use the property that $ \partial\Omega $ is compact and construct a finite covering $ \left\{B(x_i,r_i)\right\}_{i=1}^{N} $ for $ \partial\Omega $. Then I can choose $ K $ which is a compact subset of $ \Omega $ and $ \operatorname{dist}(K,\partial\Omega)>0 $ such that $ \Omega\subset\cup_{i}^{N}B(x_i,r_i)\cup K $. By using the classical Schauder estimates on $ K $, I can obtain that \begin{eqnarray} \left\|u\right\|_{C^{2,\alpha}(K)}\leq C\left(\left\|f\right\|_{C^{0,\alpha}(\Omega)}+\left\|u\right\|_{L^{\infty}(\Omega)}\right), \end{eqnarray} where $ C $ is a constant depending only on $ n, K, \Omega $ and $ \alpha $. We can directly obtain \begin{eqnarray} \left\|u\right\|_{C^{2,\alpha}(K)}\leq C\left(\left\|f\right\|_{C^{0,\alpha}(\Omega)}+\left\|g\right\|_{C^{0,\alpha}(\partial\Omega)}\right), \end{eqnarray} by using the maximum principle for laplacian. However I have some trouble in getting the boundary estimate (*). In the book "Regularity Theory for Elliptic PDE" written by Fernandez-Real, the author give a instruction we should use the blow up method and use the Liouville's theorem in the half-space, I tried but failed at some details. Can you give me some hints on dealing with the boundary terms or give me some references on it?

added 10 characters in body
Source Link

How to deal with the boundary estimatesestimate for the Schauder estimateestimates of laplacian equations?

Recently, I am learning Schauder estimates for elliptic equations and I come across a proposition as follows\

Let $ \alpha\in (0,1) $ and $ \Omega $ be a bounded $ C^2(\Omega) $ domain on $ \mathbb{R}^n $, let $ u\in C^{2,\alpha}(\Omega) $ be a weak solution to \begin{eqnarray} \Delta u&=&f \text{ in }\Omega\\ u&=&g\text{ on }\partial\Omega, \end{eqnarray} for $ f\in C^{0,\alpha}(\Omega) $ and $ g\in C^{0,\alpha}(\partial\Omega) $. Then
\begin{eqnarray} \left\|u\right\|_{C^{2,\alpha}(\Omega)}\leq C\left(\left\|f\right\|_{C^{0,\alpha}(\Omega)}+\left\|g\right\|_{C^{2,\alpha}(\partial\Omega)}\right), \end{eqnarray} for some constant $ C $ depending only on $ \alpha, n, $ and $ \Omega $.

This proposition is a boundary estimates for the solution. I want to prove it and here is my try. First I notice that the estimate can be decomposed to two parts, the interior part and the boundary parts. That is, if we can prove that for all $ x_0\in \partial \Omega $, there exists a ball $ B(x_0,r) $ with radius $ r>0 $, center $ x_0 $ and a constant $ C $ depending only on $ \alpha, n, $ and $ \Omega $ such that \begin{eqnarray} \left\|u\right\|_{C^{2,\alpha}(B(x_0,r/2)\cap\Omega)}\leq C\left(\left\|f\right\|_{C^{0,\alpha}(B(x_0,r/2)\cap\Omega)}+\left\|g\right\|_{C^{2,\alpha}(B(x_0,r/2)\cap\partial\Omega)}\right),(*) \end{eqnarray} I can use the property that $ \partial\Omega $ is compact and construct a finite covering $ \left\{B(x_i,r_i)\right\}_{i=1}^{N} $ for $ \partial\Omega $. Then I can choose $ K $ which is a compact subset of $ \Omega $ and $ \operatorname{dist}(K,\partial\Omega)>0 $ such that $ \Omega\subset\cup_{i}^{N}B(x_i,r_i)\cup K $. By using the classical Schauder estimates on $ K $, I can obtain that \begin{eqnarray} \left\|u\right\|_{C^{2,\alpha}(K)}\leq C\left(\left\|f\right\|_{C^{0,\alpha}(\Omega)}+\left\|u\right\|_{L^{\infty}(\Omega)}\right), \end{eqnarray} where $ C $ is a constant depending only on $ n, K, \Omega $ and $ \alpha $. We can directly obtain \begin{eqnarray} \left\|u\right\|_{C^{2,\alpha}(K)}\leq C\left(\left\|f\right\|_{C^{0,\alpha}(\Omega)}+\left\|g\right\|_{C^{0,\alpha}(\partial\Omega)}\right), \end{eqnarray} by using the maximum principle for laplacian. However I have some trouble in getting the boundary estimate (*). In the book "Regularity Theory for Elliptic PDE" written by Fernandez-Real, the author give a instruction we should use the blow up method and use the Liouville's theorem in the half-space, I tried but failed at some details. Can you give me some hints on dealing with the boundary terms or give me some references on it?

How to deal with the boundary estimates for the Schauder estimate of laplacian equations?

Recently, I am learning Schauder estimates for elliptic and I come across a proposition as follows\

Let $ \alpha\in (0,1) $ and $ \Omega $ be a bounded $ C^2(\Omega) $ domain on $ \mathbb{R}^n $, let $ u\in C^{2,\alpha}(\Omega) $ be a weak solution to \begin{eqnarray} \Delta u&=&f \text{ in }\Omega\\ u&=&g\text{ on }\partial\Omega, \end{eqnarray} for $ f\in C^{0,\alpha}(\Omega) $ and $ g\in C^{0,\alpha}(\partial\Omega) $. Then
\begin{eqnarray} \left\|u\right\|_{C^{2,\alpha}(\Omega)}\leq C\left(\left\|f\right\|_{C^{0,\alpha}(\Omega)}+\left\|g\right\|_{C^{2,\alpha}(\partial\Omega)}\right), \end{eqnarray} for some constant $ C $ depending only on $ \alpha, n, $ and $ \Omega $.

This proposition is a boundary estimates for the solution. I want to prove it and here is my try. First I notice that the estimate can be decomposed to two parts, the interior part and the boundary parts. That is, if we can prove that for all $ x_0\in \partial \Omega $, there exists a ball $ B(x_0,r) $ with radius $ r>0 $, center $ x_0 $ and a constant $ C $ depending only on $ \alpha, n, $ and $ \Omega $ such that \begin{eqnarray} \left\|u\right\|_{C^{2,\alpha}(B(x_0,r/2)\cap\Omega)}\leq C\left(\left\|f\right\|_{C^{0,\alpha}(B(x_0,r/2)\cap\Omega)}+\left\|g\right\|_{C^{2,\alpha}(B(x_0,r/2)\cap\partial\Omega)}\right),(*) \end{eqnarray} I can use the property that $ \partial\Omega $ is compact and construct a finite covering $ \left\{B(x_i,r_i)\right\}_{i=1}^{N} $ for $ \partial\Omega $. Then I can choose $ K $ which is a compact subset of $ \Omega $ and $ \operatorname{dist}(K,\partial\Omega)>0 $ such that $ \Omega\subset\cup_{i}^{N}B(x_i,r_i)\cup K $. By using the classical Schauder estimates on $ K $, I can obtain that \begin{eqnarray} \left\|u\right\|_{C^{2,\alpha}(K)}\leq C\left(\left\|f\right\|_{C^{0,\alpha}(\Omega)}+\left\|u\right\|_{L^{\infty}(\Omega)}\right), \end{eqnarray} where $ C $ is a constant depending only on $ n, K, \Omega $ and $ \alpha $. We can directly obtain \begin{eqnarray} \left\|u\right\|_{C^{2,\alpha}(K)}\leq C\left(\left\|f\right\|_{C^{0,\alpha}(\Omega)}+\left\|g\right\|_{C^{0,\alpha}(\partial\Omega)}\right), \end{eqnarray} by using the maximum principle for laplacian. However I have some trouble in getting the boundary estimate (*). In the book "Regularity Theory for Elliptic PDE" written by Fernandez-Real, the author give a instruction we should use the blow up method and use the Liouville's theorem in the half-space, I tried but failed at some details. Can you give me some hints on dealing with the boundary terms or give me some references on it?

How to deal with the boundary estimate for the Schauder estimates of laplacian equations?

Recently, I am learning Schauder estimates for elliptic equations and I come across a proposition as follows\

Let $ \alpha\in (0,1) $ and $ \Omega $ be a bounded $ C^2(\Omega) $ domain on $ \mathbb{R}^n $, let $ u\in C^{2,\alpha}(\Omega) $ be a weak solution to \begin{eqnarray} \Delta u&=&f \text{ in }\Omega\\ u&=&g\text{ on }\partial\Omega, \end{eqnarray} for $ f\in C^{0,\alpha}(\Omega) $ and $ g\in C^{0,\alpha}(\partial\Omega) $. Then
\begin{eqnarray} \left\|u\right\|_{C^{2,\alpha}(\Omega)}\leq C\left(\left\|f\right\|_{C^{0,\alpha}(\Omega)}+\left\|g\right\|_{C^{2,\alpha}(\partial\Omega)}\right), \end{eqnarray} for some constant $ C $ depending only on $ \alpha, n, $ and $ \Omega $.

This proposition is a boundary estimates for the solution. I want to prove it and here is my try. First I notice that the estimate can be decomposed to two parts, the interior part and the boundary parts. That is, if we can prove that for all $ x_0\in \partial \Omega $, there exists a ball $ B(x_0,r) $ with radius $ r>0 $, center $ x_0 $ and a constant $ C $ depending only on $ \alpha, n, $ and $ \Omega $ such that \begin{eqnarray} \left\|u\right\|_{C^{2,\alpha}(B(x_0,r/2)\cap\Omega)}\leq C\left(\left\|f\right\|_{C^{0,\alpha}(B(x_0,r/2)\cap\Omega)}+\left\|g\right\|_{C^{2,\alpha}(B(x_0,r/2)\cap\partial\Omega)}\right),(*) \end{eqnarray} I can use the property that $ \partial\Omega $ is compact and construct a finite covering $ \left\{B(x_i,r_i)\right\}_{i=1}^{N} $ for $ \partial\Omega $. Then I can choose $ K $ which is a compact subset of $ \Omega $ and $ \operatorname{dist}(K,\partial\Omega)>0 $ such that $ \Omega\subset\cup_{i}^{N}B(x_i,r_i)\cup K $. By using the classical Schauder estimates on $ K $, I can obtain that \begin{eqnarray} \left\|u\right\|_{C^{2,\alpha}(K)}\leq C\left(\left\|f\right\|_{C^{0,\alpha}(\Omega)}+\left\|u\right\|_{L^{\infty}(\Omega)}\right), \end{eqnarray} where $ C $ is a constant depending only on $ n, K, \Omega $ and $ \alpha $. We can directly obtain \begin{eqnarray} \left\|u\right\|_{C^{2,\alpha}(K)}\leq C\left(\left\|f\right\|_{C^{0,\alpha}(\Omega)}+\left\|g\right\|_{C^{0,\alpha}(\partial\Omega)}\right), \end{eqnarray} by using the maximum principle for laplacian. However I have some trouble in getting the boundary estimate (*). In the book "Regularity Theory for Elliptic PDE" written by Fernandez-Real, the author give a instruction we should use the blow up method and use the Liouville's theorem in the half-space, I tried but failed at some details. Can you give me some hints on dealing with the boundary terms or give me some references on it?

Source Link

How to deal with the boundary estimates for the Schauder estimate of laplacian equations?

Recently, I am learning Schauder estimates for elliptic and I come across a proposition as follows\

Let $ \alpha\in (0,1) $ and $ \Omega $ be a bounded $ C^2(\Omega) $ domain on $ \mathbb{R}^n $, let $ u\in C^{2,\alpha}(\Omega) $ be a weak solution to \begin{eqnarray} \Delta u&=&f \text{ in }\Omega\\ u&=&g\text{ on }\partial\Omega, \end{eqnarray} for $ f\in C^{0,\alpha}(\Omega) $ and $ g\in C^{0,\alpha}(\partial\Omega) $. Then
\begin{eqnarray} \left\|u\right\|_{C^{2,\alpha}(\Omega)}\leq C\left(\left\|f\right\|_{C^{0,\alpha}(\Omega)}+\left\|g\right\|_{C^{2,\alpha}(\partial\Omega)}\right), \end{eqnarray} for some constant $ C $ depending only on $ \alpha, n, $ and $ \Omega $.

This proposition is a boundary estimates for the solution. I want to prove it and here is my try. First I notice that the estimate can be decomposed to two parts, the interior part and the boundary parts. That is, if we can prove that for all $ x_0\in \partial \Omega $, there exists a ball $ B(x_0,r) $ with radius $ r>0 $, center $ x_0 $ and a constant $ C $ depending only on $ \alpha, n, $ and $ \Omega $ such that \begin{eqnarray} \left\|u\right\|_{C^{2,\alpha}(B(x_0,r/2)\cap\Omega)}\leq C\left(\left\|f\right\|_{C^{0,\alpha}(B(x_0,r/2)\cap\Omega)}+\left\|g\right\|_{C^{2,\alpha}(B(x_0,r/2)\cap\partial\Omega)}\right),(*) \end{eqnarray} I can use the property that $ \partial\Omega $ is compact and construct a finite covering $ \left\{B(x_i,r_i)\right\}_{i=1}^{N} $ for $ \partial\Omega $. Then I can choose $ K $ which is a compact subset of $ \Omega $ and $ \operatorname{dist}(K,\partial\Omega)>0 $ such that $ \Omega\subset\cup_{i}^{N}B(x_i,r_i)\cup K $. By using the classical Schauder estimates on $ K $, I can obtain that \begin{eqnarray} \left\|u\right\|_{C^{2,\alpha}(K)}\leq C\left(\left\|f\right\|_{C^{0,\alpha}(\Omega)}+\left\|u\right\|_{L^{\infty}(\Omega)}\right), \end{eqnarray} where $ C $ is a constant depending only on $ n, K, \Omega $ and $ \alpha $. We can directly obtain \begin{eqnarray} \left\|u\right\|_{C^{2,\alpha}(K)}\leq C\left(\left\|f\right\|_{C^{0,\alpha}(\Omega)}+\left\|g\right\|_{C^{0,\alpha}(\partial\Omega)}\right), \end{eqnarray} by using the maximum principle for laplacian. However I have some trouble in getting the boundary estimate (*). In the book "Regularity Theory for Elliptic PDE" written by Fernandez-Real, the author give a instruction we should use the blow up method and use the Liouville's theorem in the half-space, I tried but failed at some details. Can you give me some hints on dealing with the boundary terms or give me some references on it?