Skip to main content
edited body
Source Link

There are various deformations of the Jacobi identity that can be found scattered in the literature. As far as i know, using the definition: $[A,B]_q=AB-qBA$, one of the most general ones (though i do not now if this is "symmetric" enough for your purposes) is the following one: $$ \big[A,[B,C]_{q_1}\big]_{q_2}+q_2\big[B,[C,A]_{q_1}\big]_{q_2^{-1}}+\big[C,[A,B]_{q_1q_2}\big]=0 $$ which is valid for arbitrary values of the parameters $q_1$, $q_2$. See [1].

Notice that both identities stated by the OP are compatible with it:

  • The first one can be recovered for: $q_1=q$, $q_2=1$,
  • while a particular case (for $k=-m$) of the second one for: $q_1=q^n$, $q_2=q^m$.

Edit: I was thinking that the second identity of the OP might be combined with the 2-parameter deformation given here to construct a further 3-parameter deformation of the Jacobi identity. But i am not sure on its exact form, i 'll try to think a little on it and come back if something interesting comes up.

Edit 2: I was thinking about the OP's last paragraph (asking for something more preetypretty or symmetric). Well, i did some further search and it turns out that we can get some symmetric generalization if we consider a two parameter deformation of the commutator. Using $[A,B]_{(p,q)}=pAB-qBA$ we have the following 3-parameter deformation of the Jacobi identity: $$ {\small \big[A,[B,C]_{(q_1,q_1^{-1})}\big]_{(q_3/q_2,q_2/q_3)}+\big[B,[C,A]_{(q_2,q_2^{-1})}\big]_{(q_1/q_3,q_3/q_1)}+\big[C,[A,B]_{(q_3,q_3^{-1})}\big]_{(q_2/q_1,q_1/q_2)}=0 } $$ See: [2].

References:
[1]. $q$-deformed Jacobi identity, $q$-oscillators and $q$-deformed infinite-dimensional algebras, Chaichian, Kulish, Lukierski, Phys. Let. B, v.237, 3-4, p. 401-406, 1990
[2]. On $q$-deformed infinite-dimensional $n$-algebra Lu Ding, Xiao-Yu Jia, Ke Wu, Zhao-Wen Yan, Wei-Zhong Zhao, arXiv:1404.0464v3 [hep-th]

There are various deformations of the Jacobi identity that can be found scattered in the literature. As far as i know, using the definition: $[A,B]_q=AB-qBA$, one of the most general ones (though i do not now if this is "symmetric" enough for your purposes) is the following one: $$ \big[A,[B,C]_{q_1}\big]_{q_2}+q_2\big[B,[C,A]_{q_1}\big]_{q_2^{-1}}+\big[C,[A,B]_{q_1q_2}\big]=0 $$ which is valid for arbitrary values of the parameters $q_1$, $q_2$. See [1].

Notice that both identities stated by the OP are compatible with it:

  • The first one can be recovered for: $q_1=q$, $q_2=1$,
  • while a particular case (for $k=-m$) of the second one for: $q_1=q^n$, $q_2=q^m$.

Edit: I was thinking that the second identity of the OP might be combined with the 2-parameter deformation given here to construct a further 3-parameter deformation of the Jacobi identity. But i am not sure on its exact form, i 'll try to think a little on it and come back if something interesting comes up.

Edit 2: I was thinking about the OP's last paragraph (asking for something more preety or symmetric). Well, i did some further search and it turns out that we can get some symmetric generalization if we consider a two parameter deformation of the commutator. Using $[A,B]_{(p,q)}=pAB-qBA$ we have the following 3-parameter deformation of the Jacobi identity: $$ {\small \big[A,[B,C]_{(q_1,q_1^{-1})}\big]_{(q_3/q_2,q_2/q_3)}+\big[B,[C,A]_{(q_2,q_2^{-1})}\big]_{(q_1/q_3,q_3/q_1)}+\big[C,[A,B]_{(q_3,q_3^{-1})}\big]_{(q_2/q_1,q_1/q_2)}=0 } $$ See: [2].

References:
[1]. $q$-deformed Jacobi identity, $q$-oscillators and $q$-deformed infinite-dimensional algebras, Chaichian, Kulish, Lukierski, Phys. Let. B, v.237, 3-4, p. 401-406, 1990
[2]. On $q$-deformed infinite-dimensional $n$-algebra Lu Ding, Xiao-Yu Jia, Ke Wu, Zhao-Wen Yan, Wei-Zhong Zhao, arXiv:1404.0464v3 [hep-th]

There are various deformations of the Jacobi identity that can be found scattered in the literature. As far as i know, using the definition: $[A,B]_q=AB-qBA$, one of the most general ones (though i do not now if this is "symmetric" enough for your purposes) is the following one: $$ \big[A,[B,C]_{q_1}\big]_{q_2}+q_2\big[B,[C,A]_{q_1}\big]_{q_2^{-1}}+\big[C,[A,B]_{q_1q_2}\big]=0 $$ which is valid for arbitrary values of the parameters $q_1$, $q_2$. See [1].

Notice that both identities stated by the OP are compatible with it:

  • The first one can be recovered for: $q_1=q$, $q_2=1$,
  • while a particular case (for $k=-m$) of the second one for: $q_1=q^n$, $q_2=q^m$.

Edit: I was thinking that the second identity of the OP might be combined with the 2-parameter deformation given here to construct a further 3-parameter deformation of the Jacobi identity. But i am not sure on its exact form, i 'll try to think a little on it and come back if something interesting comes up.

Edit 2: I was thinking about the OP's last paragraph (asking for something more pretty or symmetric). Well, i did some further search and it turns out that we can get some symmetric generalization if we consider a two parameter deformation of the commutator. Using $[A,B]_{(p,q)}=pAB-qBA$ we have the following 3-parameter deformation of the Jacobi identity: $$ {\small \big[A,[B,C]_{(q_1,q_1^{-1})}\big]_{(q_3/q_2,q_2/q_3)}+\big[B,[C,A]_{(q_2,q_2^{-1})}\big]_{(q_1/q_3,q_3/q_1)}+\big[C,[A,B]_{(q_3,q_3^{-1})}\big]_{(q_2/q_1,q_1/q_2)}=0 } $$ See: [2].

References:
[1]. $q$-deformed Jacobi identity, $q$-oscillators and $q$-deformed infinite-dimensional algebras, Chaichian, Kulish, Lukierski, Phys. Let. B, v.237, 3-4, p. 401-406, 1990
[2]. On $q$-deformed infinite-dimensional $n$-algebra Lu Ding, Xiao-Yu Jia, Ke Wu, Zhao-Wen Yan, Wei-Zhong Zhao, arXiv:1404.0464v3 [hep-th]

There are various deformations of the Jacobi identity that can be found scattered in the literature. As far as i know, using the definition: $[A,B]_q=AB-qBA$, one of the most general ones (though i do not now if this is "symmetric" enough for your purposes) is the following one: $$ \big[A,[B,C]_{q_1}\big]_{q_2}+q_2\big[B,[C,A]_{q_1}\big]_{q_2^{-1}}+\big[C,[A,B]_{q_1q_2}\big]=0 $$ which is valid for arbitrary values of the parameters $q_1$, $q_2$. See [1].

Notice that both identities stated by the OP are compatible with it:

  • The first one can be recovered for: $q_1=q$, $q_2=1$,
  • while a particular case (for $k=-m$) of the second one for: $q_1=q^n$, $q_2=q^m$.

Edit: I was thinking that the second identity of the OP might be combined with the 2-parameter deformation given here to construct a further 3-parameter deformation of the Jacobi identity. But i am not sure on its exact form, i 'll try to think a little on it and come back if something interesting comes up.

Edit 2: I was thinking about the OP's last paragraph (asking for something more preety or symmetric). Well, i did some further search and it turns out that we can get some symmetric generalization if we consider a two parameter deformation of the commutator. Using $[A,B]_{(p,q)}=pAB-qBA$ we have the following 3-parameter deformation of the Jacobi identity: $$ {\small \big[A,[B,C]_{(q_1,q_1^{-1})}\big]_{(q_3/q_2,q_2/q_3)}+\big[B,[C,A]_{(q_2,q_2^{-1})}\big]_{(q_1/q_3,q_3/q_1)}+\big[C,[A,B]_{(q_3,q_3^{-1})}\big]_{(q_2/q_1,q_1/q_2)}=0 } $$ See: [2].

References:
[1]. $q$-deformed Jacobi identity, $q$-oscillators and $q$-deformed infinite-dimensional algebras$q$-deformed Jacobi identity, $q$-oscillators and $q$-deformed infinite-dimensional algebras, Chaichian, Kulish, Lukierski, Phys. Let. B, v.237, 3-4, p. 401-406, 1990
[2]. On $q$-deformed infinite-dimensional $n$-algebraOn $q$-deformed infinite-dimensional $n$-algebra Lu Ding, Xiao-Yu Jia, Ke Wu, Zhao-Wen Yan, Wei-Zhong Zhao, arXiv:1404.0464v3 [hep-th]

There are various deformations of the Jacobi identity that can be found scattered in the literature. As far as i know, using the definition: $[A,B]_q=AB-qBA$, one of the most general ones (though i do not now if this is "symmetric" enough for your purposes) is the following one: $$ \big[A,[B,C]_{q_1}\big]_{q_2}+q_2\big[B,[C,A]_{q_1}\big]_{q_2^{-1}}+\big[C,[A,B]_{q_1q_2}\big]=0 $$ which is valid for arbitrary values of the parameters $q_1$, $q_2$. See [1].

Notice that both identities stated by the OP are compatible with it:

  • The first one can be recovered for: $q_1=q$, $q_2=1$,
  • while a particular case (for $k=-m$) of the second one for: $q_1=q^n$, $q_2=q^m$.

Edit: I was thinking that the second identity of the OP might be combined with the 2-parameter deformation given here to construct a further 3-parameter deformation of the Jacobi identity. But i am not sure on its exact form, i 'll try to think a little on it and come back if something interesting comes up.

Edit 2: I was thinking about the OP's last paragraph (asking for something more preety or symmetric). Well, i did some further search and it turns out that we can get some symmetric generalization if we consider a two parameter deformation of the commutator. Using $[A,B]_{(p,q)}=pAB-qBA$ we have the following 3-parameter deformation of the Jacobi identity: $$ {\small \big[A,[B,C]_{(q_1,q_1^{-1})}\big]_{(q_3/q_2,q_2/q_3)}+\big[B,[C,A]_{(q_2,q_2^{-1})}\big]_{(q_1/q_3,q_3/q_1)}+\big[C,[A,B]_{(q_3,q_3^{-1})}\big]_{(q_2/q_1,q_1/q_2)}=0 } $$ See: [2].

References:
[1]. $q$-deformed Jacobi identity, $q$-oscillators and $q$-deformed infinite-dimensional algebras, Chaichian, Kulish, Lukierski, Phys. Let. B, v.237, 3-4, p. 401-406, 1990
[2]. On $q$-deformed infinite-dimensional $n$-algebra Lu Ding, Xiao-Yu Jia, Ke Wu, Zhao-Wen Yan, Wei-Zhong Zhao, arXiv:1404.0464v3 [hep-th]

There are various deformations of the Jacobi identity that can be found scattered in the literature. As far as i know, using the definition: $[A,B]_q=AB-qBA$, one of the most general ones (though i do not now if this is "symmetric" enough for your purposes) is the following one: $$ \big[A,[B,C]_{q_1}\big]_{q_2}+q_2\big[B,[C,A]_{q_1}\big]_{q_2^{-1}}+\big[C,[A,B]_{q_1q_2}\big]=0 $$ which is valid for arbitrary values of the parameters $q_1$, $q_2$. See [1].

Notice that both identities stated by the OP are compatible with it:

  • The first one can be recovered for: $q_1=q$, $q_2=1$,
  • while a particular case (for $k=-m$) of the second one for: $q_1=q^n$, $q_2=q^m$.

Edit: I was thinking that the second identity of the OP might be combined with the 2-parameter deformation given here to construct a further 3-parameter deformation of the Jacobi identity. But i am not sure on its exact form, i 'll try to think a little on it and come back if something interesting comes up.

Edit 2: I was thinking about the OP's last paragraph (asking for something more preety or symmetric). Well, i did some further search and it turns out that we can get some symmetric generalization if we consider a two parameter deformation of the commutator. Using $[A,B]_{(p,q)}=pAB-qBA$ we have the following 3-parameter deformation of the Jacobi identity: $$ {\small \big[A,[B,C]_{(q_1,q_1^{-1})}\big]_{(q_3/q_2,q_2/q_3)}+\big[B,[C,A]_{(q_2,q_2^{-1})}\big]_{(q_1/q_3,q_3/q_1)}+\big[C,[A,B]_{(q_3,q_3^{-1})}\big]_{(q_2/q_1,q_1/q_2)}=0 } $$ See: [2].

References:
[1]. $q$-deformed Jacobi identity, $q$-oscillators and $q$-deformed infinite-dimensional algebras, Chaichian, Kulish, Lukierski, Phys. Let. B, v.237, 3-4, p. 401-406, 1990
[2]. On $q$-deformed infinite-dimensional $n$-algebra Lu Ding, Xiao-Yu Jia, Ke Wu, Zhao-Wen Yan, Wei-Zhong Zhao, arXiv:1404.0464v3 [hep-th]

added 4 characters in body
Source Link

There are various deformations of the Jacobi identity that can be found scattered in the literature. As far as i know, using the definition: $[A,B]_q=AB-qBA$, one of the most general ones (though i do not now if this is "symmetric" enough for your purposes) is the following one: $$ \big[A,[B,C]_{q_1}\big]_{q_2}+q_2\big[B,[C,A]_{q_1}\big]_{q_2^{-1}}+\big[C,[A,B]_{q_1q_2}\big]=0 $$ which is valid for arbitrary values of the parameters $q_1$, $q_2$. See [1].

Notice that both identities stated by the OP are compatible with it:

  • The first one can be recovered for: $q_1=q$, $q_2=1$,
  • while a particular case (for $k=-m$) of the second one for: $q_1=q^n$, $q_2=q^m$.

Edit: I was thinking that the second identity of the OP might be combined with the 2-parameter deformation given here to construct a further 3-parameter deformation of the Jacobi identity. But i am not sure on its exact form, i 'll try to think a little on it and come back if something interesting comes up.

Edit 2: I was thinking about the OP's last paragraph (asking for something more preety or symmetric). Well, i did some further search and it turns out that we can get some symmetric generalization if we consider a two parameter deformation of the commutator. Using $[A,B]_{(p,q)}=pAB-qBA$ we have the following 3-parameter deformation of the Jacobi identity: $$ {\small \big[A,[B,C]_{(q_1,q_1^{-1})}\big]_{(q_3/q_2,q_2/q_3)}+\big[B,[C,A]_{(q_2,q_2^{-1})}\big]_{(q_1/q_3,q_3/q_1)}+\big[C,[A,B]_{(q_3,q_3^{-1})}\big]_{(q_2/q_1,q_1/q_2)}=0 } $$ See: [2].

References:
[1]. $q$-deformed Jacobi identity, $q$-oscillators and $q$-deformed infinite-dimensional algebras, Chaichian, Kulish, Lukierski, Phys. Let. B, v.237, 3-4, p. 401-406, 1990
[2]. On q$q$-deformed infinite-dimensional n$n$-algebra Lu Ding, Xiao-Yu Jia, Ke Wu, Zhao-Wen Yan, Wei-Zhong Zhao, arXiv:1404.0464v3 [hep-th]

There are various deformations of the Jacobi identity that can be found scattered in the literature. As far as i know, using the definition: $[A,B]_q=AB-qBA$, one of the most general ones (though i do not now if this is "symmetric" enough for your purposes) is the following one: $$ \big[A,[B,C]_{q_1}\big]_{q_2}+q_2\big[B,[C,A]_{q_1}\big]_{q_2^{-1}}+\big[C,[A,B]_{q_1q_2}\big]=0 $$ which is valid for arbitrary values of the parameters $q_1$, $q_2$. See [1].

Notice that both identities stated by the OP are compatible with it:

  • The first one can be recovered for: $q_1=q$, $q_2=1$,
  • while a particular case (for $k=-m$) of the second one for: $q_1=q^n$, $q_2=q^m$.

Edit: I was thinking that the second identity of the OP might be combined with the 2-parameter deformation given here to construct a further 3-parameter deformation of the Jacobi identity. But i am not sure on its exact form, i 'll try to think a little on it and come back if something interesting comes up.

Edit 2: I was thinking about the OP's last paragraph (asking for something more preety or symmetric). Well, i did some further search and it turns out that we can get some symmetric generalization if we consider a two parameter deformation of the commutator. Using $[A,B]_{(p,q)}=pAB-qBA$ we have the following 3-parameter deformation of the Jacobi identity: $$ {\small \big[A,[B,C]_{(q_1,q_1^{-1})}\big]_{(q_3/q_2,q_2/q_3)}+\big[B,[C,A]_{(q_2,q_2^{-1})}\big]_{(q_1/q_3,q_3/q_1)}+\big[C,[A,B]_{(q_3,q_3^{-1})}\big]_{(q_2/q_1,q_1/q_2)}=0 } $$ See: [2].

References:
[1]. $q$-deformed Jacobi identity, $q$-oscillators and $q$-deformed infinite-dimensional algebras, Chaichian, Kulish, Lukierski, Phys. Let. B, v.237, 3-4, p. 401-406, 1990
[2]. On q-deformed infinite-dimensional n-algebra Lu Ding, Xiao-Yu Jia, Ke Wu, Zhao-Wen Yan, Wei-Zhong Zhao, arXiv:1404.0464v3 [hep-th]

There are various deformations of the Jacobi identity that can be found scattered in the literature. As far as i know, using the definition: $[A,B]_q=AB-qBA$, one of the most general ones (though i do not now if this is "symmetric" enough for your purposes) is the following one: $$ \big[A,[B,C]_{q_1}\big]_{q_2}+q_2\big[B,[C,A]_{q_1}\big]_{q_2^{-1}}+\big[C,[A,B]_{q_1q_2}\big]=0 $$ which is valid for arbitrary values of the parameters $q_1$, $q_2$. See [1].

Notice that both identities stated by the OP are compatible with it:

  • The first one can be recovered for: $q_1=q$, $q_2=1$,
  • while a particular case (for $k=-m$) of the second one for: $q_1=q^n$, $q_2=q^m$.

Edit: I was thinking that the second identity of the OP might be combined with the 2-parameter deformation given here to construct a further 3-parameter deformation of the Jacobi identity. But i am not sure on its exact form, i 'll try to think a little on it and come back if something interesting comes up.

Edit 2: I was thinking about the OP's last paragraph (asking for something more preety or symmetric). Well, i did some further search and it turns out that we can get some symmetric generalization if we consider a two parameter deformation of the commutator. Using $[A,B]_{(p,q)}=pAB-qBA$ we have the following 3-parameter deformation of the Jacobi identity: $$ {\small \big[A,[B,C]_{(q_1,q_1^{-1})}\big]_{(q_3/q_2,q_2/q_3)}+\big[B,[C,A]_{(q_2,q_2^{-1})}\big]_{(q_1/q_3,q_3/q_1)}+\big[C,[A,B]_{(q_3,q_3^{-1})}\big]_{(q_2/q_1,q_1/q_2)}=0 } $$ See: [2].

References:
[1]. $q$-deformed Jacobi identity, $q$-oscillators and $q$-deformed infinite-dimensional algebras, Chaichian, Kulish, Lukierski, Phys. Let. B, v.237, 3-4, p. 401-406, 1990
[2]. On $q$-deformed infinite-dimensional $n$-algebra Lu Ding, Xiao-Yu Jia, Ke Wu, Zhao-Wen Yan, Wei-Zhong Zhao, arXiv:1404.0464v3 [hep-th]

added 697 characters in body
Source Link
Loading
added 203 characters in body
Source Link
Loading
added 302 characters in body
Source Link
Loading
added 14 characters in body
Source Link
Loading
edited body
Source Link
Loading
edited body
Source Link
Loading
Source Link
Loading