Skip to main content

Timeline for Well approximating sets

Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0

12 events
when toggle format what by license comment
May 4, 2021 at 0:35 vote accept Nate River
May 3, 2021 at 16:46 answer added Yuval Peres timeline score: 4
May 3, 2021 at 6:40 comment added Nate River ... and that would have measure 0. You’re right. The same example was given to me by Yuval Peres a bit earlier. Would you like to post this as an answer so I can flag it as accepted?
May 3, 2021 at 6:39 comment added Fedor Petrov Say, if $D$ is the set of numbers $0.x_1x_2\ldots$ such that $x_{2^n}=1$ for all $n$, then for every $x\in (0, 1) $ there exists $d\in D$ for which $s_i$'s are distinct powers of 2, thus growing faster than any polynomial. Right?
May 3, 2021 at 3:21 comment added Nate River It isn’t. One might say “polynomially unbounded gaps” for a more precise term but I don’t think this is standard either.
May 3, 2021 at 3:18 comment added Sam Hopkins Is "anti-syndetic" a standard term?
May 3, 2021 at 3:10 comment added LSpice @Buzz, if you like \ldots, you'll like the "semantic dots" \dotsc and co. (\dotsb, \dotsm, \dotsi) even more!
S May 3, 2021 at 3:05 history suggested Buzz CC BY-SA 4.0
fixed typo
May 3, 2021 at 3:03 review Suggested edits
S May 3, 2021 at 3:05
May 3, 2021 at 1:33 history edited Nate River CC BY-SA 4.0
deleted 1 character in body
May 3, 2021 at 1:25 history edited Nate River CC BY-SA 4.0
added 7 characters in body
May 3, 2021 at 1:18 history asked Nate River CC BY-SA 4.0