Skip to main content
edited body
Source Link
Robert Israel
  • 54.2k
  • 1
  • 76
  • 152

Let $p_i = [x_i,y_i]$ be the vertices of the $n$-gon. To minimize the $m$-gon covering it, we minimize $r$ subject to the constraints

$$ \cos(\theta + 2 \pi j/m) (x_i - x) + \sin(\theta+2\pi j/m) (y_i - y) \le r $$ with respect to the variables $\theta, x, y, r$. Here $(x,y)$ represents the coordinates of the centre of the $m$-gon.

In the case $n=5$, $m=7$, with $x_i = \cos(2 \pi i/5)$, $y_i = \sin(2\pi i/5)$, using numerical methods in Maple I find the minimum is approximately $r = 0.987554526096907$ for $\theta = \pi$, $x = 0.0378380934711730$, $y = 0$. On the other hand, the concentric case would have $x=0$, $y=0$, and a minimum $r$ of approximately $0.995974293995239$, which is significantly greater, again for $\theta=\pi$.

EDIT: Here is a picture of the optimal solution. The centre of the pentagon is in blue, the centre of the heptagon in red.

enter image description hereenter image description here

Let $p_i = [x_i,y_i]$ be the vertices of the $n$-gon. To minimize the $m$-gon covering it, we minimize $r$ subject to the constraints

$$ \cos(\theta + 2 \pi j/m) (x_i - x) + \sin(\theta+2\pi j/m) (y_i - y) \le r $$ with respect to the variables $\theta, x, y, r$. Here $(x,y)$ represents the coordinates of the centre of the $m$-gon.

In the case $n=5$, $m=7$, with $x_i = \cos(2 \pi i/5)$, $y_i = \sin(2\pi i/5)$, using numerical methods in Maple I find the minimum is approximately $r = 0.987554526096907$ for $\theta = \pi$, $x = 0.0378380934711730$, $y = 0$. On the other hand, the concentric case would have $x=0$, $y=0$, and a minimum $r$ of approximately $0.995974293995239$, which is significantly greater, again for $\theta=\pi$.

EDIT: Here is a picture of the optimal solution. The centre of the pentagon is in blue, the centre of the heptagon in red.

enter image description here

Let $p_i = [x_i,y_i]$ be the vertices of the $n$-gon. To minimize the $m$-gon covering it, we minimize $r$ subject to the constraints

$$ \cos(\theta + 2 \pi j/m) (x_i - x) + \sin(\theta+2\pi j/m) (y_i - y) \le r $$ with respect to the variables $\theta, x, y, r$. Here $(x,y)$ represents the coordinates of the centre of the $m$-gon.

In the case $n=5$, $m=7$, with $x_i = \cos(2 \pi i/5)$, $y_i = \sin(2\pi i/5)$, using numerical methods in Maple I find the minimum is approximately $r = 0.987554526096907$ for $\theta = \pi$, $x = 0.0378380934711730$, $y = 0$. On the other hand, the concentric case would have $x=0$, $y=0$, and a minimum $r$ of approximately $0.995974293995239$, which is significantly greater, again for $\theta=\pi$.

EDIT: Here is a picture of the optimal solution. The centre of the pentagon is in blue, the centre of the heptagon in red.

enter image description here

added 218 characters in body
Source Link
Robert Israel
  • 54.2k
  • 1
  • 76
  • 152

Let $p_i = [x_i,y_i]$ be the vertices of the $n$-gon. To minimize the $m$-gon covering it, we minimize $r$ subject to the constraints

$$ \cos(\theta + 2 \pi j/m) (x_i - x) + \sin(\theta+2\pi j/m) (y_i - y) \le r $$ with respect to the variables $\theta, x, y, r$. Here $(x,y)$ represents the coordinates of the centre of the $m$-gon.

In the case $n=5$, $m=7$, with $x_i = \cos(2 \pi i/5)$, $y_i = \sin(2\pi i/5)$, using numerical methods in Maple I find the minimum is approximately $r = 0.987554526096907$ for $\theta = \pi$, $x = 0.0378380934711730$, $y = 0$. On the other hand, the concentric case would have $x=0$, $y=0$, and a minimum $r$ of approximately $0.995974293995239$, which is significantly greater, again for $\theta=\pi$.

EDIT: Here is a picture of the optimal solution. The centre of the pentagon is in blue, the centre of the heptagon in red.

enter image description here

Let $p_i = [x_i,y_i]$ be the vertices of the $n$-gon. To minimize the $m$-gon covering it, we minimize $r$ subject to the constraints

$$ \cos(\theta + 2 \pi j/m) (x_i - x) + \sin(\theta+2\pi j/m) (y_i - y) \le r $$ with respect to the variables $\theta, x, y, r$. Here $(x,y)$ represents the coordinates of the centre of the $m$-gon.

In the case $n=5$, $m=7$, with $x_i = \cos(2 \pi i/5)$, $y_i = \sin(2\pi i/5)$, using numerical methods in Maple I find the minimum is approximately $r = 0.987554526096907$ for $\theta = \pi$, $x = 0.0378380934711730$, $y = 0$. On the other hand, the concentric case would have $x=0$, $y=0$, and a minimum $r$ of approximately $0.995974293995239$, which is significantly greater, again for $\theta=\pi$.

Let $p_i = [x_i,y_i]$ be the vertices of the $n$-gon. To minimize the $m$-gon covering it, we minimize $r$ subject to the constraints

$$ \cos(\theta + 2 \pi j/m) (x_i - x) + \sin(\theta+2\pi j/m) (y_i - y) \le r $$ with respect to the variables $\theta, x, y, r$. Here $(x,y)$ represents the coordinates of the centre of the $m$-gon.

In the case $n=5$, $m=7$, with $x_i = \cos(2 \pi i/5)$, $y_i = \sin(2\pi i/5)$, using numerical methods in Maple I find the minimum is approximately $r = 0.987554526096907$ for $\theta = \pi$, $x = 0.0378380934711730$, $y = 0$. On the other hand, the concentric case would have $x=0$, $y=0$, and a minimum $r$ of approximately $0.995974293995239$, which is significantly greater, again for $\theta=\pi$.

EDIT: Here is a picture of the optimal solution. The centre of the pentagon is in blue, the centre of the heptagon in red.

enter image description here

Source Link
Robert Israel
  • 54.2k
  • 1
  • 76
  • 152

Let $p_i = [x_i,y_i]$ be the vertices of the $n$-gon. To minimize the $m$-gon covering it, we minimize $r$ subject to the constraints

$$ \cos(\theta + 2 \pi j/m) (x_i - x) + \sin(\theta+2\pi j/m) (y_i - y) \le r $$ with respect to the variables $\theta, x, y, r$. Here $(x,y)$ represents the coordinates of the centre of the $m$-gon.

In the case $n=5$, $m=7$, with $x_i = \cos(2 \pi i/5)$, $y_i = \sin(2\pi i/5)$, using numerical methods in Maple I find the minimum is approximately $r = 0.987554526096907$ for $\theta = \pi$, $x = 0.0378380934711730$, $y = 0$. On the other hand, the concentric case would have $x=0$, $y=0$, and a minimum $r$ of approximately $0.995974293995239$, which is significantly greater, again for $\theta=\pi$.