Skip to main content
deleted 1 character in body
Source Link
Donu Arapura
  • 35.2k
  • 2
  • 94
  • 160

The polarization $Q$ gives rise to a positive definite form $Q'$. Automorphisms preserve $Q'$, so they lieslie in a compact group. On the other hand, automorphisms preserve the lattice, so they lie in a discrete subgroup of a compact group. This gives finiteness. In the case of a Riemann surface, the polarization comes from the cup product, so it's canonical. Putting together with with your remarks gives finiteness for the automorphism group for a compact hyperbolic curve. As far as I can tell, this argument doesn't the Hurwitz bound of $84(g-1)$, but it works in other situations.

The polarization $Q$ gives rise to a positive definite form $Q'$. Automorphisms preserve $Q'$, so they lies in a compact group. On the other hand, automorphisms preserve the lattice, so they lie in a discrete subgroup of a compact group. This gives finiteness. In the case of a Riemann surface, the polarization comes from the cup product, so it's canonical. Putting together with with your remarks gives finiteness for the automorphism group for a compact hyperbolic curve. As far as I can tell, this argument doesn't the Hurwitz bound of $84(g-1)$, but it works in other situations.

The polarization $Q$ gives rise to a positive definite form $Q'$. Automorphisms preserve $Q'$, so they lie in a compact group. On the other hand, automorphisms preserve the lattice, so they lie in a discrete subgroup of a compact group. This gives finiteness. In the case of a Riemann surface, the polarization comes from the cup product, so it's canonical. Putting together with with your remarks gives finiteness for the automorphism group for a compact hyperbolic curve. As far as I can tell, this argument doesn't the Hurwitz bound of $84(g-1)$, but it works in other situations.

Source Link
Donu Arapura
  • 35.2k
  • 2
  • 94
  • 160

The polarization $Q$ gives rise to a positive definite form $Q'$. Automorphisms preserve $Q'$, so they lies in a compact group. On the other hand, automorphisms preserve the lattice, so they lie in a discrete subgroup of a compact group. This gives finiteness. In the case of a Riemann surface, the polarization comes from the cup product, so it's canonical. Putting together with with your remarks gives finiteness for the automorphism group for a compact hyperbolic curve. As far as I can tell, this argument doesn't the Hurwitz bound of $84(g-1)$, but it works in other situations.