Skip to main content

If we have α and β be simple closed curves $\alpha$ and $\beta$ on a surface Σg. The$\Sigma_g$, the intersection number i(α,β)$i(\alpha ,\beta)$ is defined to be the minimal cardinality of α1 ∩ β1$\alpha_1\cap\beta_1$ as α1$\alpha_1$ and β1 ranges$\beta_1$ range over all simple closed curves isotopic to α$\alpha$ and β$\beta$, respectively. We say α$\alpha$ and β$\beta$ intersect minimally if i(α, β) = |α ∩ β| $i(\alpha ,\beta) = |\alpha\cap\beta|\,$.

How to see thatαthat $\alpha$ and β$\beta$ intersect minimally if there are no pairs of p, q ∈ α ∩ β$p,q\in\alpha\cap\beta$ such that the arc joining p$p$ to q$q$ along α$\alpha$ followed by the arc from q$q$ back to p$p$ along β$\beta$ bounds a disk in Σg? (maybe$\Sigma_g$?
Maybe a sketch of the idea of proof idea?)

I think the converse is also true : "thatα"that $\alpha$ and β$\beta$ intersect minimally only if there are no pairs of p, q ∈ α ∩ β$p,q\in\alpha\cap\beta$ such that the arc joining p$p$ to q$q$ along α$\alpha$ followed by the arc from q$q$ back to p$p$ along β$\beta$ bounds a disk in Σg$\Sigma_g$."

If we have α and β be simple closed curves on a surface Σg. The intersection number i(α,β) is defined to be the minimal cardinality of α1 ∩ β1 as α1 and β1 ranges over all simple closed curves isotopic to α and β, respectively. We say α and β intersect minimally if i(α, β) = |α ∩ β|.

How to see thatα and β intersect minimally if there are no pairs of p, q ∈ α ∩ β such that the arc joining p to q along α followed by the arc from q back to p along β bounds a disk in Σg? (maybe a sketch of the idea of proof?)

I think the converse is also true : "thatα and β intersect minimally only if there are no pairs of p, q ∈ α ∩ β such that the arc joining p to q along α followed by the arc from q back to p along β bounds a disk in Σg."

If we have simple closed curves $\alpha$ and $\beta$ on a surface $\Sigma_g$, the intersection number $i(\alpha ,\beta)$ is defined to be the minimal cardinality of $\alpha_1\cap\beta_1$ as $\alpha_1$ and $\beta_1$ range over all simple closed curves isotopic to $\alpha$ and $\beta$, respectively. We say $\alpha$ and $\beta$ intersect minimally if $i(\alpha ,\beta) = |\alpha\cap\beta|\,$.

How to see that $\alpha$ and $\beta$ intersect minimally if there are no pairs of $p,q\in\alpha\cap\beta$ such that the arc joining $p$ to $q$ along $\alpha$ followed by the arc from $q$ back to $p$ along $\beta$ bounds a disk in $\Sigma_g$?
Maybe a sketch of the proof idea?

I think the converse is also true : "that $\alpha$ and $\beta$ intersect minimally only if there are no pairs of $p,q\in\alpha\cap\beta$ such that the arc joining $p$ to $q$ along $\alpha$ followed by the arc from $q$ back to $p$ along $\beta$ bounds a disk in $\Sigma_g$."

Became Hot Network Question
added 39 characters in body
Source Link

If we have α and β be simple closed curves on a surface Σg. The intersection number i(α,β) is defined to be the minimal cardinality of α1 ∩ β1 as α1 and β1 ranges over all simple closed curves isotopic to α and β, respectively. We say α and β intersect minimally if i(α, β) = |α ∩ β|.

How to see thatα and β intersect minimally if there are no pairs of p, q ∈ α ∩ β such that the arc joining p to q along α followed by the arc from q back to p along β bounds a disk in Σg.? (maybe a sketch of the idea of proof?)

I think the converse is also true : "thatα and β intersect minimally only if there are no pairs of p, q ∈ α ∩ β such that the arc joining p to q along α followed by the arc from q back to p along β bounds a disk in Σg."

If we have α and β be simple closed curves on a surface Σg. The intersection number i(α,β) is defined to be the minimal cardinality of α1 ∩ β1 as α1 and β1 ranges over all simple closed curves isotopic to α and β, respectively. We say α and β intersect minimally if i(α, β) = |α ∩ β|.

How to see thatα and β intersect minimally if there are no pairs of p, q ∈ α ∩ β such that the arc joining p to q along α followed by the arc from q back to p along β bounds a disk in Σg.

I think the converse is also true : "thatα and β intersect minimally only if there are no pairs of p, q ∈ α ∩ β such that the arc joining p to q along α followed by the arc from q back to p along β bounds a disk in Σg."

If we have α and β be simple closed curves on a surface Σg. The intersection number i(α,β) is defined to be the minimal cardinality of α1 ∩ β1 as α1 and β1 ranges over all simple closed curves isotopic to α and β, respectively. We say α and β intersect minimally if i(α, β) = |α ∩ β|.

How to see thatα and β intersect minimally if there are no pairs of p, q ∈ α ∩ β such that the arc joining p to q along α followed by the arc from q back to p along β bounds a disk in Σg? (maybe a sketch of the idea of proof?)

I think the converse is also true : "thatα and β intersect minimally only if there are no pairs of p, q ∈ α ∩ β such that the arc joining p to q along α followed by the arc from q back to p along β bounds a disk in Σg."

Source Link

Statements related to Thurston's work on the surface

If we have α and β be simple closed curves on a surface Σg. The intersection number i(α,β) is defined to be the minimal cardinality of α1 ∩ β1 as α1 and β1 ranges over all simple closed curves isotopic to α and β, respectively. We say α and β intersect minimally if i(α, β) = |α ∩ β|.

How to see thatα and β intersect minimally if there are no pairs of p, q ∈ α ∩ β such that the arc joining p to q along α followed by the arc from q back to p along β bounds a disk in Σg.

I think the converse is also true : "thatα and β intersect minimally only if there are no pairs of p, q ∈ α ∩ β such that the arc joining p to q along α followed by the arc from q back to p along β bounds a disk in Σg."