Skip to main content
a minor typo
Source Link
Martin Sleziak
  • 4.7k
  • 4
  • 35
  • 40

When I was studying the structure of the Grigorchuk group, a question came to my mind and I just had the following information:

We know that every finitely generated group of subexponential growth is amenable so its TraskiTarski number is infinity. Also if a group $G$ contains free group on two generators then we know from Jonsson-Dekker theorm that its Tarski number is 4. And from another theorem we can conclude that $G$ has exponential growth.

But I couldn't understand that, is there any relation between the Tarski number of a group and its growth, or not?

If I want to say what I mean, Let a group $G$ have Tarski number $k$, Is the growth function $\gamma_G (n)$ dependent to $k$ or not? Also if the growth function $\gamma_G (n)=\lambda$, is the Tarski number $\tau (G)$ dependent on $\lambda$ or not?

When I was studying the structure of the Grigorchuk group, a question came to my mind and I just had the following information:

We know that every finitely generated group of subexponential growth is amenable so its Traski number is infinity. Also if a group $G$ contains free group on two generators then we know from Jonsson-Dekker theorm that its Tarski number is 4. And from another theorem we can conclude that $G$ has exponential growth.

But I couldn't understand that, is there any relation between the Tarski number of a group and its growth, or not?

If I want to say what I mean, Let a group $G$ have Tarski number $k$, Is the growth function $\gamma_G (n)$ dependent to $k$ or not? Also if the growth function $\gamma_G (n)=\lambda$, is the Tarski number $\tau (G)$ dependent on $\lambda$ or not?

When I was studying the structure of the Grigorchuk group, a question came to my mind and I just had the following information:

We know that every finitely generated group of subexponential growth is amenable so its Tarski number is infinity. Also if a group $G$ contains free group on two generators then we know from Jonsson-Dekker theorm that its Tarski number is 4. And from another theorem we can conclude that $G$ has exponential growth.

But I couldn't understand that, is there any relation between the Tarski number of a group and its growth, or not?

If I want to say what I mean, Let a group $G$ have Tarski number $k$, Is the growth function $\gamma_G (n)$ dependent to $k$ or not? Also if the growth function $\gamma_G (n)=\lambda$, is the Tarski number $\tau (G)$ dependent on $\lambda$ or not?

fixed wording
Source Link
YCor
  • 63.9k
  • 5
  • 187
  • 285

When I was studying the structure of the Grigorchuk group, a question came to my mind and I just had the following information:

We know that every finitely generated group of subexponential growth is amenable so it'sits Traski number is infinity. Also if a group $G$ contains free group on two generators then we know from Jonsson-Dekker theorm that it'sits Tarski number is 4. And from another theorem we can conclude that $G$ has exponential growth.

But I couldn't understand that, is there any relation between the Tarski number of a group and it'sits growth, or not?!

If I want to say what I mean  , Let a group $G$ hashave Tarski number $k$, Is the growth functonfunction $\gamma_G (n)$ dependent to $k$ or not?! Also if the growth function $\gamma_G (n)=\lambda$, is the Tarski number $\tau (G)$ dependent toon $\lambda$ or not?!

When I was studying the structure of the Grigorchuk group, a question came to my mind and I just had the following information:

We know that every finitely generated group of subexponential growth is amenable so it's Traski number is infinity. Also if a group $G$ contains free group on two generators then we know from Jonsson-Dekker theorm that it's Tarski number is 4. And from another theorem we can conclude that $G$ has exponential growth.

But I couldn't understand that, is there any relation between the Tarski number of a group and it's growth, or not?!

If I want to say what I mean  , Let a group $G$ has Tarski number $k$, Is the growth functon $\gamma_G (n)$ dependent to $k$ or not?! Also if the growth function $\gamma_G (n)=\lambda$, is the Tarski number $\tau (G)$ dependent to $\lambda$ or not?!

When I was studying the structure of the Grigorchuk group, a question came to my mind and I just had the following information:

We know that every finitely generated group of subexponential growth is amenable so its Traski number is infinity. Also if a group $G$ contains free group on two generators then we know from Jonsson-Dekker theorm that its Tarski number is 4. And from another theorem we can conclude that $G$ has exponential growth.

But I couldn't understand that, is there any relation between the Tarski number of a group and its growth, or not?

If I want to say what I mean, Let a group $G$ have Tarski number $k$, Is the growth function $\gamma_G (n)$ dependent to $k$ or not? Also if the growth function $\gamma_G (n)=\lambda$, is the Tarski number $\tau (G)$ dependent on $\lambda$ or not?

Source Link

What is the relation between the Tarski number and growth of a group?

When I was studying the structure of the Grigorchuk group, a question came to my mind and I just had the following information:

We know that every finitely generated group of subexponential growth is amenable so it's Traski number is infinity. Also if a group $G$ contains free group on two generators then we know from Jonsson-Dekker theorm that it's Tarski number is 4. And from another theorem we can conclude that $G$ has exponential growth.

But I couldn't understand that, is there any relation between the Tarski number of a group and it's growth, or not?!

If I want to say what I mean , Let a group $G$ has Tarski number $k$, Is the growth functon $\gamma_G (n)$ dependent to $k$ or not?! Also if the growth function $\gamma_G (n)=\lambda$, is the Tarski number $\tau (G)$ dependent to $\lambda$ or not?!