Stack Exchange network consists of 183 Q&A communities including Stack Overflow, the largest, most trusted online community for developers to learn, share their knowledge, and build their careers.
Is there any work in type theory where no base types are assumed, e.g., that there are only function types in place ($t_1 \to t_2$ is a type whenever $t1$$t_1$ and $t_2$ are types)?
If not, are there specific reasons for that?
Is there any work in type theory where no base types are assumed, e.g., that there are only function types in place ($t_1 \to t_2$ is a type whenever $t1$ and $t_2$ are types)?
If not, are there specific reasons for that?
Is there any work in type theory where no base types are assumed, e.g., that there are only function types in place ($t_1 \to t_2$ is a type whenever $t_1$ and $t_2$ are types)?
Is there any work in type theory where no base types are assumed, e.g., that there are only function types in place ($t_1 \to t_2$ is a type whenever $t1$ and $t_2$ are types)?
