Skip to main content
changed title
Source Link
Daniel Asimov
  • 2.9k
  • 24
  • 26

Infinite-dimensional complex polynomial or rational Lie algebras and their pseudogroups

In studying the transformation groups generated by holomorphic vector fields V(z) d/dz on ℂ, I've noticed the (surely well-known) fact that the complex quadratic vector fields:

            {(a z2 + b z + c) d/dz  |  (a,b,c) ∊ ℂ3}

form precisely the Lie algebra whose nonzero elements generate the linear fractional transformations, i.e., PSL(2,ℂ).

  • Is there some underlying reason for this? (Beyond direct calculation, which provides an easy proof.)

Other than the further Lie algebras {0}, {a d/dz}, and {(a z + b) d/dz} over ℂ of trivial, constant, and linear (affine) vector fields, there seem to be no other polynomial finite-dimensional Lie algebras of vector fields on ℂ.

  • Is there some easy-to-explain reason for this?

The next "simplest" such polynomial Lie algebras of vector fields on C seem to be those defined by all polynomial and all rational functions:

(*)        VP := {P(z) d/dz  |  P(z) ∊ C[z]}   and   VR := {R(z) d/dz  |  R(z) ∊ C(z)}.

  • Contrariwise, do there exist finite-dimensional Lie algebras of vector fields on ℂ defined by rational functions -- other than the polynomial ones mentioned above?

  • In case VP and/or VR generate well-studied (infinite-dimensional) Lie groups"groups" of transformations from open sets of ℂ into open sets, then what are these groups? Properly, these are pseudogroups, but perhaps they behave like Lie groups.

[Note: It's not hard to compute formulas for such transformations -- the flows -- directly from an expression for the vector field in terms of its zeroes (and poles, if any).]

  • In any case, are there standard names for the Lie algebras VP and VR ?

  • References to the above matters would also be appreciated.

Infinite-dimensional complex polynomial or rational Lie algebras

In studying the transformation groups generated by holomorphic vector fields V(z) d/dz on ℂ, I've noticed the (surely well-known) fact that the complex quadratic vector fields:

            {(a z2 + b z + c) d/dz  |  (a,b,c) ∊ ℂ3}

form precisely the Lie algebra whose nonzero elements generate the linear fractional transformations, i.e., PSL(2,ℂ).

  • Is there some underlying reason for this? (Beyond direct calculation, which provides an easy proof.)

Other than the further Lie algebras {0}, {a d/dz}, and {(a z + b) d/dz} over ℂ of trivial, constant, and linear (affine) vector fields, there seem to be no other polynomial finite-dimensional Lie algebras of vector fields on ℂ.

  • Is there some easy-to-explain reason for this?

The next "simplest" such polynomial Lie algebras of vector fields on C seem to be those defined by all polynomial and all rational functions:

(*)        VP := {P(z) d/dz  |  P(z) ∊ C[z]}   and   VR := {R(z) d/dz  |  R(z) ∊ C(z)}.

  • Contrariwise, do there exist finite-dimensional Lie algebras of vector fields on ℂ defined by rational functions -- other than the polynomial ones mentioned above?

  • In case VP and/or VR generate well-studied (infinite-dimensional) Lie groups of transformations of ℂ, then what are these groups?

[Note: It's not hard to compute formulas for such transformations -- the flows -- directly from an expression for the vector field in terms of its zeroes (and poles, if any).]

  • In any case, are there standard names for the Lie algebras VP and VR ?

  • References to the above matters would also be appreciated.

Infinite-dimensional complex polynomial or rational Lie algebras and their pseudogroups

In studying the transformation groups generated by holomorphic vector fields V(z) d/dz on ℂ, I've noticed the (surely well-known) fact that the complex quadratic vector fields:

            {(a z2 + b z + c) d/dz  |  (a,b,c) ∊ ℂ3}

form precisely the Lie algebra whose nonzero elements generate the linear fractional transformations, i.e., PSL(2,ℂ).

  • Is there some underlying reason for this? (Beyond direct calculation, which provides an easy proof.)

Other than the further Lie algebras {0}, {a d/dz}, and {(a z + b) d/dz} over ℂ of trivial, constant, and linear (affine) vector fields, there seem to be no other polynomial finite-dimensional Lie algebras of vector fields on ℂ.

  • Is there some easy-to-explain reason for this?

The next "simplest" such polynomial Lie algebras of vector fields on C seem to be those defined by all polynomial and all rational functions:

(*)        VP := {P(z) d/dz  |  P(z) ∊ C[z]}   and   VR := {R(z) d/dz  |  R(z) ∊ C(z)}.

  • Contrariwise, do there exist finite-dimensional Lie algebras of vector fields on ℂ defined by rational functions -- other than the polynomial ones mentioned above?

  • In case VP and/or VR generate well-studied (infinite-dimensional) Lie "groups" of transformations from open sets of ℂ into open sets, then what are these groups? Properly, these are pseudogroups, but perhaps they behave like Lie groups.

[Note: It's not hard to compute formulas for such transformations -- the flows -- directly from an expression for the vector field in terms of its zeroes (and poles, if any).]

  • In any case, are there standard names for the Lie algebras VP and VR ?

  • References to the above matters would also be appreciated.

Added note about the ease of computing formulas for the flows
Source Link
Daniel Asimov
  • 2.9k
  • 24
  • 26

In studying the transformation groups generated by holomorphic vector fields V(z) d/dz on ℂ, I've noticed the (surely well-known) fact that the complex quadratic vector fields:

            {(a z2 + b z + c) d/dz  |  (a,b,c) ∊ ℂ3}

form precisely the Lie algebra whose nonzero elements generate the linear fractional transformations, i.e., PSL(2,ℂ).

  • Is there some underlying reason for this? (Beyond direct calculation, which provides an easy proof.)

Other than the further Lie algebras {0}, {a d/dz}, and {(a z + b) d/dz} over ℂ of trivial, constant, and linear (affine) vector fields, there seem to be no other polynomial finite-dimensional Lie algebras of vector fields on ℂ.

  • Is there some easy-to-explain reason for this?

The next "simplest" such polynomial Lie algebras of vector fields on C seem to be those defined by all polynomial and all rational functions:

(*)        VP := {P(z) d/dz  |  P(z) ∊ C[z]}   and   VR := {R(z) d/dz  |  R(z) ∊ C(z)}.

  • Contrariwise, do there exist finite-dimensional Lie algebras of vector fields on ℂ defined by rational functions -- other than the polynomial ones mentioned above?

  • In case VP and/or VR generate well-studied (infinite-dimensional) Lie groups of transformations of ℂ, then what are these groups?

[Note: It's not hard to compute formulas for such transformations -- the flows -- directly from an expression for the vector field in terms of its zeroes (and poles, if any).]

  • In any case, are there standard names for the Lie algebras VP and VR ?

  • References to the above matters would also be appreciated.

In studying the transformation groups generated by holomorphic vector fields V(z) d/dz on ℂ, I've noticed the (surely well-known) fact that the complex quadratic vector fields:

            {(a z2 + b z + c) d/dz  |  (a,b,c) ∊ ℂ3}

form precisely the Lie algebra whose nonzero elements generate the linear fractional transformations, i.e., PSL(2,ℂ).

  • Is there some underlying reason for this? (Beyond direct calculation, which provides an easy proof.)

Other than the further Lie algebras {0}, {a d/dz}, and {(a z + b) d/dz} over ℂ of trivial, constant, and linear (affine) vector fields, there seem to be no other polynomial finite-dimensional Lie algebras of vector fields on ℂ.

  • Is there some easy-to-explain reason for this?

The next "simplest" such polynomial Lie algebras of vector fields on C seem to be those defined by all polynomial and all rational functions:

(*)        VP := {P(z) d/dz  |  P(z) ∊ C[z]}   and   VR := {R(z) d/dz  |  R(z) ∊ C(z)}.

  • Contrariwise, do there exist finite-dimensional Lie algebras of vector fields on ℂ defined by rational functions -- other than the polynomial ones mentioned above?

  • In case VP and/or VR generate well-studied (infinite-dimensional) Lie groups of transformations of ℂ, then what are these groups?

  • In any case, are there standard names for the Lie algebras VP and VR ?

  • References to the above matters would also be appreciated.

In studying the transformation groups generated by holomorphic vector fields V(z) d/dz on ℂ, I've noticed the (surely well-known) fact that the complex quadratic vector fields:

            {(a z2 + b z + c) d/dz  |  (a,b,c) ∊ ℂ3}

form precisely the Lie algebra whose nonzero elements generate the linear fractional transformations, i.e., PSL(2,ℂ).

  • Is there some underlying reason for this? (Beyond direct calculation, which provides an easy proof.)

Other than the further Lie algebras {0}, {a d/dz}, and {(a z + b) d/dz} over ℂ of trivial, constant, and linear (affine) vector fields, there seem to be no other polynomial finite-dimensional Lie algebras of vector fields on ℂ.

  • Is there some easy-to-explain reason for this?

The next "simplest" such polynomial Lie algebras of vector fields on C seem to be those defined by all polynomial and all rational functions:

(*)        VP := {P(z) d/dz  |  P(z) ∊ C[z]}   and   VR := {R(z) d/dz  |  R(z) ∊ C(z)}.

  • Contrariwise, do there exist finite-dimensional Lie algebras of vector fields on ℂ defined by rational functions -- other than the polynomial ones mentioned above?

  • In case VP and/or VR generate well-studied (infinite-dimensional) Lie groups of transformations of ℂ, then what are these groups?

[Note: It's not hard to compute formulas for such transformations -- the flows -- directly from an expression for the vector field in terms of its zeroes (and poles, if any).]

  • In any case, are there standard names for the Lie algebras VP and VR ?

  • References to the above matters would also be appreciated.

probably -> surely
Source Link
Daniel Asimov
  • 2.9k
  • 24
  • 26

In studying the transformation groups generated by holomorphic vector fields V(z) d/dz on ℂ, I've noticed the (probablysurely well-known) fact that the complex quadratic vector fields:

            {(a z2 + b z + c) d/dz  |  (a,b,c) ∊ ℂ3}

form precisely the Lie algebra whose nonzero elements generate the linear fractional transformations, i.e., PSL(2,ℂ).

  • Is there some underlying reason for this? (Beyond direct calculation, which provides an easy proof.)

Other than the further Lie algebras {0}, {a d/dz}, and {(a z + b) d/dz} over ℂ of trivial, constant, and linear (affine) vector fields, there seem to be no other polynomial finite-dimensional Lie algebras of vector fields on ℂ.

  • Is there some easy-to-explain reason for this?

The next "simplest" such polynomial Lie algebras of vector fields on C seem to be those defined by all polynomial and all rational functions:

(*)        VP := {P(z) d/dz  |  P(z) ∊ C[z]}   and   VR := {R(z) d/dz  |  R(z) ∊ C(z)}.

  • Contrariwise, do there exist finite-dimensional Lie algebras of vector fields on ℂ defined by rational functions -- other than the polynomial ones mentioned above?

  • In case VP and/or VR generate well-studied (infinite-dimensional) Lie groups of transformations of ℂ, then what are these groups?

  • In any case, are there standard names for the Lie algebras VP and VR ?

  • References to the above matters would also be appreciated.

In studying the transformation groups generated by holomorphic vector fields V(z) d/dz on ℂ, I've noticed the (probably well-known) fact that the complex quadratic vector fields:

            {(a z2 + b z + c) d/dz  |  (a,b,c) ∊ ℂ3}

form precisely the Lie algebra whose nonzero elements generate the linear fractional transformations, i.e., PSL(2,ℂ).

  • Is there some underlying reason for this? (Beyond direct calculation, which provides an easy proof.)

Other than the further Lie algebras {0}, {a d/dz}, and {(a z + b) d/dz} over ℂ of trivial, constant, and linear (affine) vector fields, there seem to be no other polynomial finite-dimensional Lie algebras of vector fields on ℂ.

  • Is there some easy-to-explain reason for this?

The next "simplest" such polynomial Lie algebras of vector fields on C seem to be those defined by all polynomial and all rational functions:

(*)        VP := {P(z) d/dz  |  P(z) ∊ C[z]}   and   VR := {R(z) d/dz  |  R(z) ∊ C(z)}.

  • Contrariwise, do there exist finite-dimensional Lie algebras of vector fields on ℂ defined by rational functions -- other than the polynomial ones mentioned above?

  • In case VP and/or VR generate well-studied (infinite-dimensional) Lie groups of transformations of ℂ, then what are these groups?

  • In any case, are there standard names for the Lie algebras VP and VR ?

  • References to the above matters would also be appreciated.

In studying the transformation groups generated by holomorphic vector fields V(z) d/dz on ℂ, I've noticed the (surely well-known) fact that the complex quadratic vector fields:

            {(a z2 + b z + c) d/dz  |  (a,b,c) ∊ ℂ3}

form precisely the Lie algebra whose nonzero elements generate the linear fractional transformations, i.e., PSL(2,ℂ).

  • Is there some underlying reason for this? (Beyond direct calculation, which provides an easy proof.)

Other than the further Lie algebras {0}, {a d/dz}, and {(a z + b) d/dz} over ℂ of trivial, constant, and linear (affine) vector fields, there seem to be no other polynomial finite-dimensional Lie algebras of vector fields on ℂ.

  • Is there some easy-to-explain reason for this?

The next "simplest" such polynomial Lie algebras of vector fields on C seem to be those defined by all polynomial and all rational functions:

(*)        VP := {P(z) d/dz  |  P(z) ∊ C[z]}   and   VR := {R(z) d/dz  |  R(z) ∊ C(z)}.

  • Contrariwise, do there exist finite-dimensional Lie algebras of vector fields on ℂ defined by rational functions -- other than the polynomial ones mentioned above?

  • In case VP and/or VR generate well-studied (infinite-dimensional) Lie groups of transformations of ℂ, then what are these groups?

  • In any case, are there standard names for the Lie algebras VP and VR ?

  • References to the above matters would also be appreciated.

Source Link
Daniel Asimov
  • 2.9k
  • 24
  • 26
Loading