Skip to main content
fixed typos
Source Link
YCor
  • 63.9k
  • 5
  • 187
  • 286

Exactness of Injective Tensor Poductsinjective tensor products

For (algebraic) tensor products, it is well-known that the functor $A\otimes_R \cdot:Mod_R\rightarrow Mod_R$ is only (left-) exact when $A$ is a flat $R$-module. In partiuclarparticular, all vector spaces are flat. What happens in the continuous (archimedean) setting?:

Let $B$ be a separable infinite-dimensional Banach space and suppose that $ f:E\rightarrow F, $ is a continuous linear injective map from a separable nuclear space $E$ to a separable Banach space $F$, both infinite-dimensional (if it matters). Let $\otimes_{\epsilon}$ denote the injective tensor product of LCS and let $\hat{\otimes}_{\epsilon}$ denote its completion.

Is the map $ 1_{B}\hat{\otimes}_{\epsilon} f: B\hat{\otimes}_{\epsilon} E \rightarrow B\hat{\otimes}_{\epsilon} F, $ a continuous linear 1-1 map also?

Related: This post is related to this unanswered post.

Exactness of Injective Tensor Poducts

For (algebraic) tensor products, it is well-known that the functor $A\otimes_R \cdot:Mod_R\rightarrow Mod_R$ is only (left-) exact when $A$ is a flat $R$-module. In partiuclar, all vector spaces are flat. What happens in the continuous (archimedean) setting?:

Let $B$ be a separable infinite-dimensional Banach space and suppose that $ f:E\rightarrow F, $ is a continuous linear injective map from a separable nuclear space $E$ to a separable Banach space $F$, both infinite-dimensional (if it matters). Let $\otimes_{\epsilon}$ denote the injective tensor product of LCS and let $\hat{\otimes}_{\epsilon}$ denote its completion.

Is the map $ 1_{B}\hat{\otimes}_{\epsilon} f: B\hat{\otimes}_{\epsilon} E \rightarrow B\hat{\otimes}_{\epsilon} F, $ a continuous linear 1-1 map also?

Related: This post is related to this unanswered post.

Exactness of injective tensor products

For (algebraic) tensor products, it is well-known that the functor $A\otimes_R \cdot:Mod_R\rightarrow Mod_R$ is only (left-) exact when $A$ is a flat $R$-module. In particular, all vector spaces are flat. What happens in the continuous (archimedean) setting?:

Let $B$ be a separable infinite-dimensional Banach space and suppose that $ f:E\rightarrow F, $ is a continuous linear injective map from a separable nuclear space $E$ to a separable Banach space $F$, both infinite-dimensional (if it matters). Let $\otimes_{\epsilon}$ denote the injective tensor product of LCS and let $\hat{\otimes}_{\epsilon}$ denote its completion.

Is the map $ 1_{B}\hat{\otimes}_{\epsilon} f: B\hat{\otimes}_{\epsilon} E \rightarrow B\hat{\otimes}_{\epsilon} F, $ a continuous linear 1-1 map also?

Related: This post is related to this unanswered post.

added 80 characters in body
Source Link
ABIM
  • 5.4k
  • 3
  • 19
  • 41

For (algebraic) tensor products, it is well-known that the functor $A\otimes_R \cdot:Mod_R\rightarrow Mod_R$ is only (left-) exact when $A$ is a flat $R$-module. In partiuclar, all vector spaces are flat. What happens in the continuous (archimedean) setting?:

Let $B$ be a separable infinite-dimensional Banach space and suppose that $ f:E\rightarrow F, $ is a continuous linear injective map from a separable nuclear space $E$ to a separable Banach space $F$, both infinite-dimensional (if it matters). Let $\otimes_{\epsilon}$ denote the injective tensor product of LCS and let $\hat{\otimes}_{\epsilon}$ denote its completion.

Is the map $ 1_{B}\otimes f: B\otimes_{\epsilon} E \rightarrow B\otimes_{\epsilon} F, $$ 1_{B}\hat{\otimes}_{\epsilon} f: B\hat{\otimes}_{\epsilon} E \rightarrow B\hat{\otimes}_{\epsilon} F, $ a continuous linear 1-1 map also?

Related: This post is related to this unanswered post.

For (algebraic) tensor products, it is well-known that the functor $A\otimes_R \cdot:Mod_R\rightarrow Mod_R$ is only (left-) exact when $A$ is a flat $R$-module. In partiuclar, all vector spaces are flat. What happens in the continuous (archimedean) setting?:

Let $B$ be a separable infinite-dimensional Banach space and suppose that $ f:E\rightarrow F, $ is a continuous linear injective map from a separable nuclear space $E$ to a separable Banach space $F$, both infinite-dimensional (if it matters). Let $\otimes_{\epsilon}$ denote the injective tensor product of LCS.

Is the map $ 1_{B}\otimes f: B\otimes_{\epsilon} E \rightarrow B\otimes_{\epsilon} F, $ a continuous linear 1-1 map also?

Related: This post is related to this unanswered post.

For (algebraic) tensor products, it is well-known that the functor $A\otimes_R \cdot:Mod_R\rightarrow Mod_R$ is only (left-) exact when $A$ is a flat $R$-module. In partiuclar, all vector spaces are flat. What happens in the continuous (archimedean) setting?:

Let $B$ be a separable infinite-dimensional Banach space and suppose that $ f:E\rightarrow F, $ is a continuous linear injective map from a separable nuclear space $E$ to a separable Banach space $F$, both infinite-dimensional (if it matters). Let $\otimes_{\epsilon}$ denote the injective tensor product of LCS and let $\hat{\otimes}_{\epsilon}$ denote its completion.

Is the map $ 1_{B}\hat{\otimes}_{\epsilon} f: B\hat{\otimes}_{\epsilon} E \rightarrow B\hat{\otimes}_{\epsilon} F, $ a continuous linear 1-1 map also?

Related: This post is related to this unanswered post.

Source Link
ABIM
  • 5.4k
  • 3
  • 19
  • 41

Exactness of Injective Tensor Poducts

For (algebraic) tensor products, it is well-known that the functor $A\otimes_R \cdot:Mod_R\rightarrow Mod_R$ is only (left-) exact when $A$ is a flat $R$-module. In partiuclar, all vector spaces are flat. What happens in the continuous (archimedean) setting?:

Let $B$ be a separable infinite-dimensional Banach space and suppose that $ f:E\rightarrow F, $ is a continuous linear injective map from a separable nuclear space $E$ to a separable Banach space $F$, both infinite-dimensional (if it matters). Let $\otimes_{\epsilon}$ denote the injective tensor product of LCS.

Is the map $ 1_{B}\otimes f: B\otimes_{\epsilon} E \rightarrow B\otimes_{\epsilon} F, $ a continuous linear 1-1 map also?

Related: This post is related to this unanswered post.