Skip to main content
Name of paper
Source Link
LSpice
  • 12.9k
  • 4
  • 45
  • 69

I believe this question is answered (at least for the case of the symmetric group) by the "higher Specht basis" of Ariki, Terasoma, and Yamada; see the recent preprint https://arxiv.org/abs/2005.02110Gillespie and Rhoades - Higher Specht bases for generalizations of the coinvariant ring for a discussion of this problem in a broader context.

I believe this question is answered (at least for the case of the symmetric group) by the "higher Specht basis" of Ariki, Terasoma, and Yamada; see the recent preprint https://arxiv.org/abs/2005.02110 for a discussion of this problem in a broader context.

I believe this question is answered (at least for the case of the symmetric group) by the "higher Specht basis" of Ariki, Terasoma, and Yamada; see the recent preprint Gillespie and Rhoades - Higher Specht bases for generalizations of the coinvariant ring for a discussion of this problem in a broader context.

Source Link
Sam Hopkins
  • 24.2k
  • 5
  • 97
  • 171

I believe this question is answered (at least for the case of the symmetric group) by the "higher Specht basis" of Ariki, Terasoma, and Yamada; see the recent preprint https://arxiv.org/abs/2005.02110 for a discussion of this problem in a broader context.