Skip to main content
20 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Nov 24 at 0:13 comment added Rob In some fields, such as medicine and law, it's a matter of knowing where to look in which book (now greatly aided by Internet searching) rather than holding all the knowledge in your head simultaneously. But in those fields your also expected to know the cases where what you see before you doesn't apply, the counter argument and potentially defeating it or using it to your advantage. If I knew how to apply that to mathematics I'd be good at that too.
May 23, 2021 at 13:03 comment added mgex Well, I’m here as a junior high math teacher, with an undergrad only, aiming to get my high school math certification. I personally have felt overwhelmed being expected to know so many things from several math disciplines. But I have grown so much in trying! That part in itself has been exciting, yet I too have felt like an “imposter” for thinking I belong at this level. As I await the results of my cert. exam, I found this post while searching how people can know so much about math. I was impressed and encouraged by all these comments, and read every single one. I was surprised by the respect
Mar 11, 2020 at 14:19 vote accept sudolearn
Mar 10, 2020 at 15:53 comment added sudolearn Thank you all of you for your comments. It seems that I ought to pick a problem and solve it, as Timothy Chow suggested.
Mar 10, 2020 at 8:58 comment added epa095 Be aware that your impression of how much other people know are certainly skewed, you don't feel their ignorance as strongly as your own. This can lead to imposter syndrome (en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Impostor_syndrome). You might be experiencing an instance of this: images.app.goo.gl/miy1guRaWmZStQ8L9
Mar 10, 2020 at 6:29 answer added Vladimir Dotsenko timeline score: 7
Mar 10, 2020 at 1:35 comment added Kimball Elsewhere on SE, you can find this quote of Ravi Vakil: _...mathematics is so rich and infinite that it is impossible to learn it systematically, and if you wait to master one topic before moving on to the next, you'll never get anywhere. Instead, you'll have tendrils of knowledge extending far from your comfort zone. Then you can later backfill from these tendrils, and extend your comfort zone; this is much easier to do than learning "forwards". _
Mar 9, 2020 at 23:00 history became hot network question
Mar 9, 2020 at 20:37 comment added Dan Fox Teaching is a great way to learn broadly.
Mar 9, 2020 at 19:59 comment added Dror Speiser Small comment: you probably can read Tate's thesis. I wouldn't put this in the same category as Deligne's Weil conjectures papers as far as needed background material is concerned.
Mar 9, 2020 at 19:53 answer added Will Sawin timeline score: 42
Mar 9, 2020 at 18:55 history edited user147650 CC BY-SA 4.0
deleted 2 characters in body
Mar 9, 2020 at 18:50 comment added Timothy Chow I will offer some slightly contrarian advice, as I did in another MO answer. Don't let yourself get overwhelmed with trying to learn mountains of math. Instead, focus on finding a good problem to work on (obviously, a good advisor is extremely valuable here). Then learn the math you need for the problem. You'll learn the math better this way because you'll understand the purpose. Of course your knowledge will have gaps, but that's inevitable no matter what you do.
Mar 9, 2020 at 17:20 answer added Gerhard Paseman timeline score: 4
Mar 9, 2020 at 16:56 comment added GH from MO As my algebra professor said: it does not matter what you read, but it should be good and a lot, done rapidly and thoroughly.
Mar 9, 2020 at 16:45 answer added R. van Dobben de Bruyn timeline score: 38
Mar 9, 2020 at 15:36 answer added Alexander Schmeding timeline score: 14
Mar 9, 2020 at 15:04 history made wiki Post Made Community Wiki by Todd Trimble
Mar 9, 2020 at 15:00 review First posts
Mar 9, 2020 at 16:01
Mar 9, 2020 at 14:57 history asked sudolearn CC BY-SA 4.0