Skip to main content
Commonmark migration
Source Link

Consider the function

$$f_{n}(x)=e^{-x^2}x^n.$$

and the function

$$h_p(x):=e^{-\vert x \vert^p}.$$

My goal is to analyze

$$ F_p(y):=\frac{(f_2*h_p)(y)}{(f_0*h_p)(y)}- \left(\frac{(f_1*h_p)(y) }{(f_0*h_p)(y)}\right)^2$$

Question: Can we show that $F_p$ has a global maximum at zero for $p>2$ and a global minimum at zero for $p<2$?

Here are graphs from Mathematica for

  • $F_1$, with a unique minimum

[![][2]][2]

  • $F_4$, with a unique maximum

[![][3]][3]

  • $F_{2+10^{-4}}$, i.e. with an exponent slightly above $2$

[![][4]][4]

  • $F_{2-10^{-4}}$, i.e. with an exponent slightly below $2$

[![][5]][5]

Further observations:

Iosif Pinelis showed that $F_2(y)$ is constant, see this earlier question of mine [question I asked some days ago][1]question I asked some days ago.

All functions $F_p$ are positive by the Cauchy-Schwarz inequality.

The functions $F_p$ are not log-convex or log-concave in general.

Finally, I computed the first derivative for convolving with $e^{-\vert x \vert^p}$ at $p=2$ by numerically differentiating

[![][6]][6]

If you have any other conjectures you would like to me to verify, I am happy to do so. Just leave a comment! [1]: https://i.sstatic.net/2NvRL.jpg [2]: https://i.sstatic.net/VIFOi.jpg [3]: https://i.sstatic.net/H1N0U.jpg [4]: https://i.sstatic.net/4HMAP.jpg [5]: https://i.sstatic.net/Caurg.jpg [6]: https://i.sstatic.net/0uVdR.jpg

Consider the function

$$f_{n}(x)=e^{-x^2}x^n.$$

and the function

$$h_p(x):=e^{-\vert x \vert^p}.$$

My goal is to analyze

$$ F_p(y):=\frac{(f_2*h_p)(y)}{(f_0*h_p)(y)}- \left(\frac{(f_1*h_p)(y) }{(f_0*h_p)(y)}\right)^2$$

Question: Can we show that $F_p$ has a global maximum at zero for $p>2$ and a global minimum at zero for $p<2$?

Here are graphs from Mathematica for

  • $F_1$, with a unique minimum

[![][2]][2]

  • $F_4$, with a unique maximum

[![][3]][3]

  • $F_{2+10^{-4}}$, i.e. with an exponent slightly above $2$

[![][4]][4]

  • $F_{2-10^{-4}}$, i.e. with an exponent slightly below $2$

[![][5]][5]

Further observations:

Iosif Pinelis showed that $F_2(y)$ is constant, see this earlier question of mine [question I asked some days ago][1].

All functions $F_p$ are positive by the Cauchy-Schwarz inequality.

The functions $F_p$ are not log-convex or log-concave in general.

Finally, I computed the first derivative for convolving with $e^{-\vert x \vert^p}$ at $p=2$ by numerically differentiating

[![][6]][6]

If you have any other conjectures you would like to me to verify, I am happy to do so. Just leave a comment! [1]: https://i.sstatic.net/2NvRL.jpg [2]: https://i.sstatic.net/VIFOi.jpg [3]: https://i.sstatic.net/H1N0U.jpg [4]: https://i.sstatic.net/4HMAP.jpg [5]: https://i.sstatic.net/Caurg.jpg [6]: https://i.sstatic.net/0uVdR.jpg

Consider the function

$$f_{n}(x)=e^{-x^2}x^n.$$

and the function

$$h_p(x):=e^{-\vert x \vert^p}.$$

My goal is to analyze

$$ F_p(y):=\frac{(f_2*h_p)(y)}{(f_0*h_p)(y)}- \left(\frac{(f_1*h_p)(y) }{(f_0*h_p)(y)}\right)^2$$

Question: Can we show that $F_p$ has a global maximum at zero for $p>2$ and a global minimum at zero for $p<2$?

Here are graphs from Mathematica for

  • $F_1$, with a unique minimum

  • $F_4$, with a unique maximum

  • $F_{2+10^{-4}}$, i.e. with an exponent slightly above $2$

  • $F_{2-10^{-4}}$, i.e. with an exponent slightly below $2$

Further observations:

Iosif Pinelis showed that $F_2(y)$ is constant, see this earlier question of mine question I asked some days ago.

All functions $F_p$ are positive by the Cauchy-Schwarz inequality.

The functions $F_p$ are not log-convex or log-concave in general.

Finally, I computed the first derivative for convolving with $e^{-\vert x \vert^p}$ at $p=2$ by numerically differentiating

If you have any other conjectures you would like to me to verify, I am happy to do so. Just leave a comment!

Notice removed Authoritative reference needed by Landauer
Bounty Ended with fedja's answer chosen by Landauer
deleted 167 characters in body; edited title
Source Link
Landauer
  • 173
  • 1
  • 15

Phase transition in convolution-($p>2$ still open!) Properties of convolutions

After Fedja's nice treatment of the case $p<2$, I am looking for ideas how to attack this problem in the regime $p>2$ and I am grateful for any hint or suggestion.

Consider the function

$$f_{n}(x)=e^{-x^2}x^n.$$

and the function

$$h_p(x):=e^{-\vert x \vert^p}.$$

My goal is to analyze

$$ F_p(y):=\frac{(f_2*h_p)(y)}{(f_0*h_p)(y)}- \left(\frac{(f_1*h_p)(y) }{(f_0*h_p)(y)}\right)^2$$

Question: Can we show that $F_p$ has a global maximum at zero for $p>2$ and a global minimum at zero for $p<2$?

Here are graphs from Mathematica for

  • $F_1$, with a unique minimum

[![][2]][2]

  • $F_4$, with a unique maximum

[![][3]][3]

  • $F_{2+10^{-4}}$, i.e. with an exponent slightly above $2$

[![][4]][4]

  • $F_{2-10^{-4}}$, i.e. with an exponent slightly below $2$

[![][5]][5]

Further observations:

Iosif Pinelis showed that $F_2(y)$ is constant, see this earlier question of mine [question I asked some days ago][1].

All functions $F_p$ are positive by the Cauchy-Schwarz inequality.

The functions $F_p$ are not log-convex or log-concave in general.

Finally, I computed the first derivative for convolving with $e^{-\vert x \vert^p}$ at $p=2$ by numerically differentiating

[![][6]][6]

If you have any other conjectures you would like to me to verify, I am happy to do so. Just leave a comment! [1]: https://i.sstatic.net/2NvRL.jpg [2]: https://i.sstatic.net/VIFOi.jpg [3]: https://i.sstatic.net/H1N0U.jpg [4]: https://i.sstatic.net/4HMAP.jpg [5]: https://i.sstatic.net/Caurg.jpg [6]: https://i.sstatic.net/0uVdR.jpg

Phase transition in convolution-($p>2$ still open!)

After Fedja's nice treatment of the case $p<2$, I am looking for ideas how to attack this problem in the regime $p>2$ and I am grateful for any hint or suggestion.

Consider the function

$$f_{n}(x)=e^{-x^2}x^n.$$

and the function

$$h_p(x):=e^{-\vert x \vert^p}.$$

My goal is to analyze

$$ F_p(y):=\frac{(f_2*h_p)(y)}{(f_0*h_p)(y)}- \left(\frac{(f_1*h_p)(y) }{(f_0*h_p)(y)}\right)^2$$

Question: Can we show that $F_p$ has a global maximum at zero for $p>2$ and a global minimum at zero for $p<2$?

Here are graphs from Mathematica for

  • $F_1$, with a unique minimum

[![][2]][2]

  • $F_4$, with a unique maximum

[![][3]][3]

  • $F_{2+10^{-4}}$, i.e. with an exponent slightly above $2$

[![][4]][4]

  • $F_{2-10^{-4}}$, i.e. with an exponent slightly below $2$

[![][5]][5]

Further observations:

Iosif Pinelis showed that $F_2(y)$ is constant, see this earlier question of mine [question I asked some days ago][1].

All functions $F_p$ are positive by the Cauchy-Schwarz inequality.

The functions $F_p$ are not log-convex or log-concave in general.

Finally, I computed the first derivative for convolving with $e^{-\vert x \vert^p}$ at $p=2$ by numerically differentiating

[![][6]][6]

If you have any other conjectures you would like to me to verify, I am happy to do so. Just leave a comment! [1]: https://i.sstatic.net/2NvRL.jpg [2]: https://i.sstatic.net/VIFOi.jpg [3]: https://i.sstatic.net/H1N0U.jpg [4]: https://i.sstatic.net/4HMAP.jpg [5]: https://i.sstatic.net/Caurg.jpg [6]: https://i.sstatic.net/0uVdR.jpg

Properties of convolutions

Consider the function

$$f_{n}(x)=e^{-x^2}x^n.$$

and the function

$$h_p(x):=e^{-\vert x \vert^p}.$$

My goal is to analyze

$$ F_p(y):=\frac{(f_2*h_p)(y)}{(f_0*h_p)(y)}- \left(\frac{(f_1*h_p)(y) }{(f_0*h_p)(y)}\right)^2$$

Question: Can we show that $F_p$ has a global maximum at zero for $p>2$ and a global minimum at zero for $p<2$?

Here are graphs from Mathematica for

  • $F_1$, with a unique minimum

[![][2]][2]

  • $F_4$, with a unique maximum

[![][3]][3]

  • $F_{2+10^{-4}}$, i.e. with an exponent slightly above $2$

[![][4]][4]

  • $F_{2-10^{-4}}$, i.e. with an exponent slightly below $2$

[![][5]][5]

Further observations:

Iosif Pinelis showed that $F_2(y)$ is constant, see this earlier question of mine [question I asked some days ago][1].

All functions $F_p$ are positive by the Cauchy-Schwarz inequality.

The functions $F_p$ are not log-convex or log-concave in general.

Finally, I computed the first derivative for convolving with $e^{-\vert x \vert^p}$ at $p=2$ by numerically differentiating

[![][6]][6]

If you have any other conjectures you would like to me to verify, I am happy to do so. Just leave a comment! [1]: https://i.sstatic.net/2NvRL.jpg [2]: https://i.sstatic.net/VIFOi.jpg [3]: https://i.sstatic.net/H1N0U.jpg [4]: https://i.sstatic.net/4HMAP.jpg [5]: https://i.sstatic.net/Caurg.jpg [6]: https://i.sstatic.net/0uVdR.jpg

deleted 3 characters in body
Source Link
Landauer
  • 173
  • 1
  • 15

Let me say first that I would also appreciate the posting of partial results (in particular fedja'sAfter Fedja's nice treatment of the case $p<2$) or, I am looking for ideas how to attack this problem in the regime $p>2$ and I am grateful for any hint or suggestion.

Consider the function

$$f_{n}(x)=e^{-x^2}x^n.$$

and the function

$$h_p(x):=e^{-\vert x \vert^p}.$$

My goal is to analyze

$$ F_p(y):=\frac{(f_2*h_p)(y)}{(f_0*h_p)(y)}- \left(\frac{(f_1*h_p)(y) }{(f_0*h_p)(y)}\right)^2$$

Question: Can we show that $F_p$ has a global maximum at zero for $p>2$ and a global minimum at zero for $p<2$?

Here are graphs from Mathematica for

  • $F_1$, with a unique minimum

[![][2]][2]

  • $F_4$, with a unique maximum

[![][3]][3]

  • $F_{2+10^{-4}}$, i.e. with an exponent slightly above $2$

[![][4]][4]

  • $F_{2-10^{-4}}$, i.e. with an exponent slightly below $2$

[![][5]][5]

Further observations:

Iosif Pinelis showed that $F_2(y)$ is constant, see this earlier question of mine [question I asked some days ago][1].

All functions $F_p$ are positive by the Cauchy-Schwarz inequality.

The functions $F_p$ are not log-convex or log-concave in general.

Finally, I computed the first derivative for convolving with $e^{-\vert x \vert^p}$ at $p=2$ by numerically differentiating

[![][6]][6]

If you have any other conjectures you would like to me to verify, I am happy to do so. Just leave a comment! [1]: https://i.sstatic.net/2NvRL.jpg [2]: https://i.sstatic.net/VIFOi.jpg [3]: https://i.sstatic.net/H1N0U.jpg [4]: https://i.sstatic.net/4HMAP.jpg [5]: https://i.sstatic.net/Caurg.jpg [6]: https://i.sstatic.net/0uVdR.jpg

Let me say first that I would also appreciate the posting of partial results (in particular fedja's treatment of the case $p<2$) or ideas how to attack this problem.

Consider the function

$$f_{n}(x)=e^{-x^2}x^n.$$

and the function

$$h_p(x):=e^{-\vert x \vert^p}.$$

My goal is to analyze

$$ F_p(y):=\frac{(f_2*h_p)(y)}{(f_0*h_p)(y)}- \left(\frac{(f_1*h_p)(y) }{(f_0*h_p)(y)}\right)^2$$

Question: Can we show that $F_p$ has a global maximum at zero for $p>2$ and a global minimum at zero for $p<2$?

Here are graphs from Mathematica for

  • $F_1$, with a unique minimum

[![][2]][2]

  • $F_4$, with a unique maximum

[![][3]][3]

  • $F_{2+10^{-4}}$, i.e. with an exponent slightly above $2$

[![][4]][4]

  • $F_{2-10^{-4}}$, i.e. with an exponent slightly below $2$

[![][5]][5]

Further observations:

Iosif Pinelis showed that $F_2(y)$ is constant, see this earlier question of mine [question I asked some days ago][1].

All functions $F_p$ are positive by the Cauchy-Schwarz inequality.

The functions $F_p$ are not log-convex or log-concave in general.

Finally, I computed the first derivative for convolving with $e^{-\vert x \vert^p}$ at $p=2$ by numerically differentiating

[![][6]][6]

If you have any other conjectures you would like to me to verify, I am happy to do so. Just leave a comment! [1]: https://i.sstatic.net/2NvRL.jpg [2]: https://i.sstatic.net/VIFOi.jpg [3]: https://i.sstatic.net/H1N0U.jpg [4]: https://i.sstatic.net/4HMAP.jpg [5]: https://i.sstatic.net/Caurg.jpg [6]: https://i.sstatic.net/0uVdR.jpg

After Fedja's nice treatment of the case $p<2$, I am looking for ideas how to attack this problem in the regime $p>2$ and I am grateful for any hint or suggestion.

Consider the function

$$f_{n}(x)=e^{-x^2}x^n.$$

and the function

$$h_p(x):=e^{-\vert x \vert^p}.$$

My goal is to analyze

$$ F_p(y):=\frac{(f_2*h_p)(y)}{(f_0*h_p)(y)}- \left(\frac{(f_1*h_p)(y) }{(f_0*h_p)(y)}\right)^2$$

Question: Can we show that $F_p$ has a global maximum at zero for $p>2$ and a global minimum at zero for $p<2$?

Here are graphs from Mathematica for

  • $F_1$, with a unique minimum

[![][2]][2]

  • $F_4$, with a unique maximum

[![][3]][3]

  • $F_{2+10^{-4}}$, i.e. with an exponent slightly above $2$

[![][4]][4]

  • $F_{2-10^{-4}}$, i.e. with an exponent slightly below $2$

[![][5]][5]

Further observations:

Iosif Pinelis showed that $F_2(y)$ is constant, see this earlier question of mine [question I asked some days ago][1].

All functions $F_p$ are positive by the Cauchy-Schwarz inequality.

The functions $F_p$ are not log-convex or log-concave in general.

Finally, I computed the first derivative for convolving with $e^{-\vert x \vert^p}$ at $p=2$ by numerically differentiating

[![][6]][6]

If you have any other conjectures you would like to me to verify, I am happy to do so. Just leave a comment! [1]: https://i.sstatic.net/2NvRL.jpg [2]: https://i.sstatic.net/VIFOi.jpg [3]: https://i.sstatic.net/H1N0U.jpg [4]: https://i.sstatic.net/4HMAP.jpg [5]: https://i.sstatic.net/Caurg.jpg [6]: https://i.sstatic.net/0uVdR.jpg

edited title
Link
Landauer
  • 173
  • 1
  • 15
Loading
added 52 characters in body
Source Link
Landauer
  • 173
  • 1
  • 15
Loading
deleted 6 characters in body
Source Link
Landauer
  • 173
  • 1
  • 15
Loading
added 118 characters in body
Source Link
Landauer
  • 173
  • 1
  • 15
Loading
added 108 characters in body
Source Link
Landauer
  • 173
  • 1
  • 15
Loading
added 9 characters in body
Source Link
Landauer
  • 173
  • 1
  • 15
Loading
deleted 1058 characters in body
Source Link
user44143
user44143
Loading
added 154 characters in body
Source Link
Landauer
  • 173
  • 1
  • 15
Loading
Notice added Authoritative reference needed by Landauer
Bounty Started worth 200 reputation by Landauer
deleted 217 characters in body
Source Link
Landauer
  • 173
  • 1
  • 15
Loading
added 1 character in body
Source Link
Landauer
  • 173
  • 1
  • 15
Loading
added 110 characters in body
Source Link
Landauer
  • 173
  • 1
  • 15
Loading
added 391 characters in body
Source Link
Landauer
  • 173
  • 1
  • 15
Loading
added 42 characters in body
Source Link
Landauer
  • 173
  • 1
  • 15
Loading
added 325 characters in body
Source Link
Landauer
  • 173
  • 1
  • 15
Loading
edited body
Source Link
Landauer
  • 173
  • 1
  • 15
Loading
added 47 characters in body
Source Link
Landauer
  • 173
  • 1
  • 15
Loading
added 3 characters in body
Source Link
Landauer
  • 173
  • 1
  • 15
Loading
edited body
Source Link
Landauer
  • 173
  • 1
  • 15
Loading