Skip to main content
deleted 22 characters in body
Source Link
Carlo Beenakker
  • 188.1k
  • 18
  • 448
  • 651

The answer to the question as stated (maximum of row elements) has been solved in Extreme statistics of complex random and quantum chaotic states, see also this MO posting:

$$\int dU \max_j |U_{1,j}|^2 =\frac{1}{d}\sum_{j=1}^d \frac{1}{j}.$$

For large $d$ this tends to $(1/d)\log d$. The complete probability distribution of the row-maximum is known (Gumbel distribution).


The maximum of all matrix elements is more difficult and only large-$d$ asymptotics has a closed-form expression, see Maxima of entries of Haar distributed matrices (alternative link).

If $W_d$ is the maximum matrix element in absolute value of a Haar-distributed $d\times d$ unitary matrix, then $W_d^2\rightarrow (2/d)\log d$ in probability for $d\rightarrow\infty$, so twice as large as for the row-maximum.

The answer to the question as stated (maximum of row elements) has been solved in Extreme statistics of complex random and quantum chaotic states, see also this MO posting:

$$\int dU \max_j |U_{1,j}|^2 =\frac{1}{d}\sum_{j=1}^d \frac{1}{j}.$$

For large $d$ this tends to $(1/d)\log d$. The complete probability distribution of the row-maximum is known (Gumbel distribution).


The maximum of all matrix elements is more difficult and only large-$d$ asymptotics has a closed-form expression, see Maxima of entries of Haar distributed matrices (alternative link).

If $W_d$ is the maximum matrix element in absolute value of a Haar-distributed $d\times d$ unitary matrix, then $W_d^2\rightarrow (2/d)\log d$ in probability for $d\rightarrow\infty$, so twice as large as for the row-maximum.

The answer to the question as stated (maximum of row elements) has been solved in Extreme statistics of complex random and quantum chaotic states, see also this MO posting:

$$\int dU \max_j |U_{1,j}|^2 =\frac{1}{d}\sum_{j=1}^d \frac{1}{j}.$$

For large $d$ this tends to $(1/d)\log d$. The complete probability distribution of the row-maximum is known.


The maximum of all matrix elements is more difficult and only large-$d$ asymptotics has a closed-form expression, see Maxima of entries of Haar distributed matrices (alternative link).

If $W_d$ is the maximum matrix element in absolute value of a Haar-distributed $d\times d$ unitary matrix, then $W_d^2\rightarrow (2/d)\log d$ in probability for $d\rightarrow\infty$, so twice as large as for the row-maximum.

added 20 characters in body
Source Link
Carlo Beenakker
  • 188.1k
  • 18
  • 448
  • 651

The answer to the question as stated (maximum of row elements) has been solved in Extreme statistics of complex random and quantum chaotic states, see also this MO posting:

$$\int dU \max_j |U_{1,j}|^2 =\frac{H_d}{d},$$$$\int dU \max_j |U_{1,j}|^2 =\frac{1}{d}\sum_{j=1}^d \frac{1}{j}.$$

with $H_d=\sum_{j=1}^d 1/j$ the harmonic number. For large $d$ this tends to $(1/d)\log d$. The complete probability distribution of the row-maximum is known (Gumbel distribution).


The maximum of all matrix elements is more difficult and only large-$d$ asymptotics is knownhas a closed-form expression, see Maxima of entries of Haar distributed matrices (alternative link).

If $W_d$ is the maximum matrix element in absolute value of a Haar-distributed $d\times d$ unitary matrix, then $W_d^2\rightarrow (2/d)\log d$ in probability for $d\rightarrow\infty$, so twice as large as for the row-maximum.

The answer to the question as stated (maximum of row elements) has been solved in Extreme statistics of complex random and quantum chaotic states, see also this MO posting:

$$\int dU \max_j |U_{1,j}|^2 =\frac{H_d}{d},$$

with $H_d=\sum_{j=1}^d 1/j$ the harmonic number. For large $d$ this tends to $(1/d)\log d$. The complete probability distribution of the row-maximum is known (Gumbel distribution).


The maximum of all matrix elements is more difficult and only large-$d$ asymptotics is known, see Maxima of entries of Haar distributed matrices (alternative link).

If $W_d$ is the maximum matrix element in absolute value of a Haar-distributed $d\times d$ unitary matrix, then $W_d^2\rightarrow (2/d)\log d$ in probability for $d\rightarrow\infty$, so twice as large as for the row-maximum.

The answer to the question as stated (maximum of row elements) has been solved in Extreme statistics of complex random and quantum chaotic states, see also this MO posting:

$$\int dU \max_j |U_{1,j}|^2 =\frac{1}{d}\sum_{j=1}^d \frac{1}{j}.$$

For large $d$ this tends to $(1/d)\log d$. The complete probability distribution of the row-maximum is known (Gumbel distribution).


The maximum of all matrix elements is more difficult and only large-$d$ asymptotics has a closed-form expression, see Maxima of entries of Haar distributed matrices (alternative link).

If $W_d$ is the maximum matrix element in absolute value of a Haar-distributed $d\times d$ unitary matrix, then $W_d^2\rightarrow (2/d)\log d$ in probability for $d\rightarrow\infty$, so twice as large as for the row-maximum.

added 74 characters in body
Source Link
Carlo Beenakker
  • 188.1k
  • 18
  • 448
  • 651

The answer to the question as stated (maximum of row elements) has been solved in Extreme statistics of complex random and quantum chaotic states, see also this MO posting:

$$\int dU \max_j |U_{1,j}|^2 =\frac{H_d}{d},$$

with $H_d=\sum_{j=1}^d 1/j$ the harmonic number. For large $d$ this tends to $(1/d)\log d$. The complete probability distribution of the row-maximum is known (Gumbel distribution).


The maximum of all matrix elements is more subtle:

This problem has been considered in thedifficult and only large-$d$ limit inasymptotics is known, see Maxima of entries of Haar distributed matrices (alternative link).

If $W_d$ is the maximum matrix element in absolute value of a Haar-distributed $d\times d$ unitary matrix, then $W_d^2\rightarrow (2/d)\log d$ in probability for $d\rightarrow\infty$, so twice as large as for the row-maximum.

The answer to the question as stated (maximum of row elements) has been solved in Extreme statistics of complex random and quantum chaotic states, see also this MO posting:

$$\int dU \max_j |U_{1,j}|^2 =\frac{H_d}{d},$$

with $H_d=\sum_{j=1}^d 1/j$ the harmonic number. For large $d$ this tends to $(1/d)\log d$.


The maximum of all matrix elements is more subtle:

This problem has been considered in the large-$d$ limit in Maxima of entries of Haar distributed matrices (alternative link).

If $W_d$ is the maximum matrix element in absolute value of a Haar-distributed $d\times d$ unitary matrix, then $W_d^2\rightarrow (2/d)\log d$ in probability for $d\rightarrow\infty$, so twice as large as for the row-maximum.

The answer to the question as stated (maximum of row elements) has been solved in Extreme statistics of complex random and quantum chaotic states, see also this MO posting:

$$\int dU \max_j |U_{1,j}|^2 =\frac{H_d}{d},$$

with $H_d=\sum_{j=1}^d 1/j$ the harmonic number. For large $d$ this tends to $(1/d)\log d$. The complete probability distribution of the row-maximum is known (Gumbel distribution).


The maximum of all matrix elements is more difficult and only large-$d$ asymptotics is known, see Maxima of entries of Haar distributed matrices (alternative link).

If $W_d$ is the maximum matrix element in absolute value of a Haar-distributed $d\times d$ unitary matrix, then $W_d^2\rightarrow (2/d)\log d$ in probability for $d\rightarrow\infty$, so twice as large as for the row-maximum.

deleted 49 characters in body
Source Link
Carlo Beenakker
  • 188.1k
  • 18
  • 448
  • 651
Loading
added 230 characters in body
Source Link
Carlo Beenakker
  • 188.1k
  • 18
  • 448
  • 651
Loading
added 10 characters in body
Source Link
Carlo Beenakker
  • 188.1k
  • 18
  • 448
  • 651
Loading
Source Link
Carlo Beenakker
  • 188.1k
  • 18
  • 448
  • 651
Loading