Timeline for Does the variance of a strictly monotonically increasing function of a random variable have anything to do with the variance of the random variable?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
6 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 13, 2019 at 14:59 | comment | added | dd Kong | It's my fault that I didn't think carefully before posting the question, and this will be the final version; at least the main content won't be altered. | |
| Oct 13, 2019 at 14:11 | comment | added | Yuval Peres | PS if you keep changing the question, no one will answer your questions. Better to think hard and post another question after checking many examples. | |
| Oct 13, 2019 at 14:07 | history | edited | Yuval Peres | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 140 characters in body
|
| Oct 13, 2019 at 14:06 | comment | added | Nate Eldredge | @ddKong: Continuity won't change anything. Replace each of the point masses with a normal distribution centered at the point and having very small variance. | |
| Oct 13, 2019 at 13:57 | comment | added | dd Kong | Thanks. I edited the question again, and I want to know what will happen when the random variable is continuous. | |
| Oct 13, 2019 at 13:45 | history | answered | Yuval Peres | CC BY-SA 4.0 |