Timeline for Lipschitz vs. bi-Lipschitz parametrizations for subsets of Euclidean space [closed]
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
8 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 17, 2019 at 7:54 | history | closed |
YCor Konstantinos Kanakoglou darij grinberg LSpice Ben McKay |
Needs details or clarity | |
| Sep 10, 2019 at 10:56 | history | edited | mdr | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
Fixed grammar
|
| Sep 9, 2019 at 14:40 | review | Close votes | |||
| Sep 17, 2019 at 7:54 | |||||
| Sep 9, 2019 at 14:34 | answer | added | mdr | timeline score: 1 | |
| Sep 9, 2019 at 14:21 | comment | added | mdr | Thanks, I overlooked that example. So I'm thinking more of local bi-Lipschitz equivalence rather than global equivalence. Of course, you can take a shrinking "Hawaiian earing" sequence of circles as a variation on the standard circle. But now the failure is more for "topological" reasons than "metric" reasons. | |
| Sep 9, 2019 at 14:17 | history | edited | mdr | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
Clarified the intention of my question.
|
| Sep 9, 2019 at 9:45 | comment | added | Yuval Peres | A circle $t \mapsto (cos t, sint)$ is an example for $n=1$. Perhaps you wanted to rephrase the question? | |
| Sep 9, 2019 at 8:11 | history | asked | mdr | CC BY-SA 4.0 |