Skip to main content
added 144 characters in body
Source Link
Myshkin
  • 149
  • 9

Could anyone explain to me what does it mean by a map $f\to K_f$ and $f\to \rho(f(x_0), x_0)$ has an algebraic tail relative some measure, where $\rho$ is Prohorov metric, from this paper Paper which are expressed in equation $(5.1)$ and $(5.2)$?

$f\mapsto K_f$ has algebraic tail related to $\mu\dots (5.1)$

$f\mapsto \rho(x_0, f(x_0)$ has algebraic tail related to $\mu\dots (5.2)$

They have the definition, but I am unable to relate mathematically what $(5.1)$ and $(5.2)$ will mean from the definition $(5.2)$.

A random variable $Y$ has algebraic tail if there are positive, finite constants $\alpha, \beta$ such that \begin{align} \mathbb P(Y>y)< \frac{\alpha}{y^{\beta}} \end{align}

Thanks a lot for any help. The idea as well as the definition I am not able to grasp, especially algebraic tail related to $\mu$.

Could anyone explain to me what does it mean by a map $f\to K_f$ and $f\to \rho(f(x_0), x_0)$ has an algebraic tail relative some measure, where $\rho$ is Prohorov metric, from this paper Paper which are expressed in equation $(5.1)$ and $(5.2)$?

They have the definition, but I am unable to relate mathematically what $(5.1)$ and $(5.2)$ will mean from the definition $(5.2)$.

A random variable $Y$ has algebraic tail if there are positive, finite constants $\alpha, \beta$ such that \begin{align} \mathbb P(Y>y)< \frac{\alpha}{y^{\beta}} \end{align}

Thanks a lot for any help. The idea as well as the definition I am not able to grasp, especially algebraic tail related to $\mu$.

Could anyone explain to me what does it mean by a map $f\to K_f$ and $f\to \rho(f(x_0), x_0)$ has an algebraic tail relative some measure, where $\rho$ is Prohorov metric, from this paper Paper which are expressed in equation $(5.1)$ and $(5.2)$?

$f\mapsto K_f$ has algebraic tail related to $\mu\dots (5.1)$

$f\mapsto \rho(x_0, f(x_0)$ has algebraic tail related to $\mu\dots (5.2)$

They have the definition, but I am unable to relate mathematically what $(5.1)$ and $(5.2)$ will mean from the definition $(5.2)$.

A random variable $Y$ has algebraic tail if there are positive, finite constants $\alpha, \beta$ such that \begin{align} \mathbb P(Y>y)< \frac{\alpha}{y^{\beta}} \end{align}

Thanks a lot for any help. The idea as well as the definition I am not able to grasp, especially algebraic tail related to $\mu$.

added 44 characters in body
Source Link
Myshkin
  • 149
  • 9

Could anyone explain to me what does it mean by a map $f\to K_f$ and $f\to \rho(f(x_0), x_0)$ has an algebraic tail relative some measure, where $\rho$ is Prohorov metric, from this paper Paper which are expressed in equation $(5.1)$ and $(5.2)$?

They have the definition, but I am unable to relate mathematically what $(5.1)$ and $(5.2)$ will mean from the definition $(5.2)$.

A random variable $Y$ has algebraic tail if there are positive, finite constants $\alpha, \beta$ such that \begin{align} \mathbb P(Y>y)< \frac{\alpha}{y^{\beta}} \end{align}

Thanks a lot for any help. The idea as well as the definition I am not able to grasp, especially algebraic tail related to $\mu$.

Could anyone explain to me what does it mean by a map $f\to K_f$ and $f\to \rho(f(x_0), x_0)$ has an algebraic tail relative some measure, where $\rho$ is Prohorov metric, from this paper Paper which are expressed in equation $(5.1)$ and $(5.2)$?

They have the definition, but I am unable to relate mathematically what $(5.1)$ and $(5.2)$ will mean from the definition $(5.2)$.

A random variable $Y$ has algebraic tail if there are positive, finite constants $\alpha, \beta$ such that \begin{align} \mathbb P(Y>y)< \frac{\alpha}{y^{\beta}} \end{align}

Thanks a lot for any help. The idea as well as the definition I am not able to grasp.

Could anyone explain to me what does it mean by a map $f\to K_f$ and $f\to \rho(f(x_0), x_0)$ has an algebraic tail relative some measure, where $\rho$ is Prohorov metric, from this paper Paper which are expressed in equation $(5.1)$ and $(5.2)$?

They have the definition, but I am unable to relate mathematically what $(5.1)$ and $(5.2)$ will mean from the definition $(5.2)$.

A random variable $Y$ has algebraic tail if there are positive, finite constants $\alpha, \beta$ such that \begin{align} \mathbb P(Y>y)< \frac{\alpha}{y^{\beta}} \end{align}

Thanks a lot for any help. The idea as well as the definition I am not able to grasp, especially algebraic tail related to $\mu$.

Source Link
Myshkin
  • 149
  • 9

algebraic tail of a random variable

Could anyone explain to me what does it mean by a map $f\to K_f$ and $f\to \rho(f(x_0), x_0)$ has an algebraic tail relative some measure, where $\rho$ is Prohorov metric, from this paper Paper which are expressed in equation $(5.1)$ and $(5.2)$?

They have the definition, but I am unable to relate mathematically what $(5.1)$ and $(5.2)$ will mean from the definition $(5.2)$.

A random variable $Y$ has algebraic tail if there are positive, finite constants $\alpha, \beta$ such that \begin{align} \mathbb P(Y>y)< \frac{\alpha}{y^{\beta}} \end{align}

Thanks a lot for any help. The idea as well as the definition I am not able to grasp.