Skip to main content
8 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Sep 9, 2019 at 14:13 comment added user126256 I think I understand my issue now; on page 147 of the book, Fuks says that the first page differential $d_1^{p,q}$ is induced by the de Rham differential. However, if you track the calculations back a bit, this differential would have to come from a de Rham differential on the space $\Gamma(\Lambda^\bullet T^* M \otimes E)$ for some other vector bundle $E$. He does not mention (but other papers by Gelfand, Fuks and Losik regarding this matter do), that this bundle $Q$ is flat, and even trivializable. Thus my question becomes redundant for my purposes. Thank you regardless!
Sep 6, 2019 at 11:44 comment added mme I don't immediately see where Fuks' book uses what you are looking for. Can you point to the precise step you are thinking of?
Sep 3, 2019 at 14:14 history edited user126256 CC BY-SA 4.0
Added requirement on differential
Sep 3, 2019 at 14:11 comment added user126256 Yeah, that is a good point. I think a reasonable requirement in my context should be that the differential is a differential operator of order 1. I will add this to the post. Thank you!
Sep 3, 2019 at 14:06 comment added mme You should put some conditions on these differentials, or it must be completely useless to you. Because all of the individual terms $C^k$ are infinite dimensional, you can cook up a differential with essentially arbitrary homology, so long as it is concentrated in degrees $0$ through $\dim M$.
S Sep 3, 2019 at 14:01 history suggested Ali Taghavi
I add the tag "Cohomology" since as it is indicated in the question it is some thing different from the standard de Rham cohomology.
Sep 3, 2019 at 14:00 review Suggested edits
S Sep 3, 2019 at 14:01
Sep 3, 2019 at 13:50 history asked user126256 CC BY-SA 4.0