Some initial clarifications
By lattice I mean aan additive subgroup of the additive group $\mathbb R^n$ thatwhich is isomorphic to $\mathbb Z^n$ and has full rank (that is, iti.e. spans $\mathbb R^n$$\Bbb R^n$ when considered as a set of vectors) and which is also isomorphic to $\mathbb Z^n$. A lattice $\mathcal L$ is integral if any $v,w\in\mathcal L$ have $\langle v,w\rangle\in\mathbb Z$ for all $v,w\in\mathcal L$, where $\langle\cdot,\cdot\rangle$ denotes the standard inner product.
Above terms are standard, but some of the terms I will use in the following, like "sublattice" and "lattice isomorphism", are probably not standard. Feel free to correct my terminology, as I simply do not know enough of that subject.
The actual question
I wonder whether every integral lattice $\mathcal L$ is isomorphic to a sublattice of $\mathbb Z^n$ in the following sense:
Consider some vectors $v_1,..., v_k\in\mathbb Z^n$. Then $$\mathcal L(v_1,...,v_k):=\mathrm{span}\{v_1,...,v_k\}\cap \mathbb Z^n$$ is an integral lattice in $\mathrm{span}\{v_1,...,v_k\}\subseteq\mathbb R^n$ (with the inner product inherited from $\mathbb Z^n$), and will be called a sublattice of $\mathbb Z^n$.
TwoI care about whether I can find $\mathcal L$ in $\Bbb Z^n$ with the right angles, not necessarily the right scale. So I need the following kind of "isomorphism": two lattices $\mathcal L_1$ and $\mathcal L_2$ are said to be isomorphic, if they are isomorphic as groups (by somethere is a group isomorphism $\phi:\mathcal L_1\to\mathcal L_2$) and if there exists a constant $\alpha\in\mathbb R$, so that $$\langle \phi(v),\phi(w)\rangle=\alpha \langle v,w\rangle,\quad\text{for all $v,w\in\mathcal L_1$}.$$ with
If not all integral lattices are such sublattices, are there some natural restriction (e.g. unimodularity) to make this true?$$\langle \phi(v),\phi(w)\rangle=\alpha \langle v,w\rangle,\quad\text{for all $v,w\in\mathcal L_1$}.$$