Skip to main content
Notice removed Draw attention by Zhiyu
Bounty Ended with Sean Lawton's answer chosen by Zhiyu
Minor edits.
Source Link
Sean Lawton
  • 8.5k
  • 3
  • 46
  • 78

Finiteness of $H_1 \backslash G / H_2$ and the geometry of the orbits

Let $G$ be a connected reductive group over an algebraicalgebraically closed field $k$. By the Bruhat decomposition, $P \backslash G/P \cong W_P \backslash W / W_P$ is a finite set for any parabolic subgroup $P$ of $G$, so. So there areis some connectionsconnection between the combinatorics of thethe Weyl group and the geometry of the orbits.

Now consider two closed subgroupsubgroups $H_i$ of $G$, when is $ H_1 \backslash G / H_2$ finite? In such case, can we describe the $H_1$-orbits in $G/H_2$ using some group theoretic datas or combinatoric datas in general?.

When is $ H_1 \backslash G / H_2$ finite? In such cases, can we describe the $H_1$-orbits in $G/H_2$ using some group theoretic data or combinatoric data in general?

If $H_1$ is a Borel subgroup, the finiteness is equivalent to that $G/H_2$ isbeing a spherical variety. And things become trivial if $H_1=G$. If $H_1=H_2$, is the finiteness equivalent to that $H_1=H_2$ is a parabolic subgroup? For low rank $G$, can we classify all such pair $(H_1,H_2)$?

If $H_1=H_2$, is the finiteness equivalent to $H_1=H_2$ being a parabolic subgroup? For low rank $G$, can we classify all such pair $(H_1,H_2)$?

Finiteness of $H_1 \backslash G / H_2$ and geometry of the orbits

Let $G$ be a connected reductive group over an algebraic closed field $k$. By Bruhat decomposition, $P \backslash G/P \cong W_P \backslash W / W_P$ is a finite set for any parabolic subgroup $P$ of $G$, so there are some connections between combinatorics of the Weyl group and geometry of the orbits.

Now consider two closed subgroup $H_i$ of $G$, when is $ H_1 \backslash G / H_2$ finite? In such case, can we describe the $H_1$-orbits in $G/H_2$ using some group theoretic datas or combinatoric datas in general?

If $H_1$ is a Borel subgroup, the finiteness is equivalent to that $G/H_2$ is a spherical variety. And things become trivial if $H_1=G$. If $H_1=H_2$, is the finiteness equivalent to that $H_1=H_2$ is a parabolic subgroup? For low rank $G$, can we classify all such pair $(H_1,H_2)$?

Finiteness of $H_1 \backslash G / H_2$ and the geometry of the orbits

Let $G$ be a connected reductive group over an algebraically closed field $k$. By the Bruhat decomposition, $P \backslash G/P \cong W_P \backslash W / W_P$ is a finite set for any parabolic subgroup $P$ of $G$. So there is some connection between the combinatorics of the Weyl group and the geometry of the orbits.

Now consider two closed subgroups $H_i$ of $G$.

When is $ H_1 \backslash G / H_2$ finite? In such cases, can we describe the $H_1$-orbits in $G/H_2$ using some group theoretic data or combinatoric data in general?

If $H_1$ is a Borel subgroup, the finiteness is equivalent to $G/H_2$ being a spherical variety. And things become trivial if $H_1=G$.

If $H_1=H_2$, is the finiteness equivalent to $H_1=H_2$ being a parabolic subgroup? For low rank $G$, can we classify all such pair $(H_1,H_2)$?

deleted 2 characters in body; edited tags
Source Link
Zhiyu
  • 6.6k
  • 2
  • 11
  • 44

Let $G$ be a connected reductive group over an algebraic closed field $k$. By Bruhat decomposition, $P \backslash G/P \cong W_P \backslash W / W_P$ is a finite set for any parabolic subgroup $P$ of $G$, so there are some connections between combinatorics of the Weyl group and geometry of the orbits.

Now consider two closed subgroup $H_i$ of $G$, when is $ H_1 \backslash G / H_2$ finite? In such case, can we describe the $H_1$-orbits in $G/H_2$ using some group theoretic datas or combinatoric datas in general?

If $H_1$ is a Borel subgroup, the finiteness is equivalent to that $G/H_2$ is a spherical variety. And things become trivial if $H_1=G$. If $H_1=H_2$, is the finiteness equivalent to that $H_1=H_2$ is a parabolic subgroup? For lowerlow rank $G$, can we classify all such pair $(H_1,H_2)$?

Let $G$ be a connected reductive group over an algebraic closed field $k$. By Bruhat decomposition, $P \backslash G/P \cong W_P \backslash W / W_P$ is a finite set for any parabolic subgroup $P$ of $G$, so there are some connections between combinatorics of the Weyl group and geometry of the orbits.

Now consider two closed subgroup $H_i$ of $G$, when is $ H_1 \backslash G / H_2$ finite? In such case, can we describe the $H_1$-orbits in $G/H_2$ using some group theoretic datas or combinatoric datas in general?

If $H_1$ is a Borel subgroup, the finiteness is equivalent to that $G/H_2$ is a spherical variety. And things become trivial if $H_1=G$. If $H_1=H_2$, is the finiteness equivalent to that $H_1=H_2$ is a parabolic subgroup? For lower rank $G$, can we classify all such pair $(H_1,H_2)$?

Let $G$ be a connected reductive group over an algebraic closed field $k$. By Bruhat decomposition, $P \backslash G/P \cong W_P \backslash W / W_P$ is a finite set for any parabolic subgroup $P$ of $G$, so there are some connections between combinatorics of the Weyl group and geometry of the orbits.

Now consider two closed subgroup $H_i$ of $G$, when is $ H_1 \backslash G / H_2$ finite? In such case, can we describe the $H_1$-orbits in $G/H_2$ using some group theoretic datas or combinatoric datas in general?

If $H_1$ is a Borel subgroup, the finiteness is equivalent to that $G/H_2$ is a spherical variety. And things become trivial if $H_1=G$. If $H_1=H_2$, is the finiteness equivalent to that $H_1=H_2$ is a parabolic subgroup? For low rank $G$, can we classify all such pair $(H_1,H_2)$?

Notice added Draw attention by Zhiyu
Bounty Started worth 50 reputation by Zhiyu
added 43 characters in body
Source Link
Zhiyu
  • 6.6k
  • 2
  • 11
  • 44

Let $G$ be a connected reductive group over an algebraic closed field $k$. By Bruhat decomposition, $P \backslash G/P \cong W_P \backslash W / W_P$ is a finite set for any parabolic subgroup $P$ of $G$, so there are some connections between combinatorics of the Weyl group and geometry of the orbits.

Now consider two closed subgroup $H_i$ of $G$, when is $ H_1 \backslash G / H_2$ finite? In such case, can we describe the $H_1$-orbits in $G/H_2$ using some group theoretic datas or combinatoric datas in general?

If $H_1$ is a Borel subgroup, the finiteness is equivalent to that $G/H_2$ is a spherical variety. And things become trivial if $H_1=G$. If $H_1=H_2$, is the finiteness equivalent to that $H_1=H_2$ is a parabolic subgroup? For lower rank $G$, can we classify all such pair $(H_1,H_2)$?

Let $G$ be a connected reductive group over an algebraic closed field $k$. By Bruhat decomposition, $P \backslash G/P \cong W_P \backslash W / W_P$ is a finite set for any parabolic subgroup $P$ of $G$, so there are some connections between combinatorics of the Weyl group and geometry of the orbits.

Now consider two closed subgroup $H_i$ of $G$, when is $ H_1 \backslash G / H_2$ finite? In such case, can we describe the $H_1$-orbits in $G/H_2$ using some group theoretic datas or combinatoric datas in general?

If $H_1$ is a Borel subgroup, the finiteness is equivalent to that $G/H_2$ is a spherical variety. If $H_1=H_2$, is the finiteness equivalent to $H_1=H_2$ is a parabolic subgroup? For lower rank $G$, can we classify all such pair $(H_1,H_2)$?

Let $G$ be a connected reductive group over an algebraic closed field $k$. By Bruhat decomposition, $P \backslash G/P \cong W_P \backslash W / W_P$ is a finite set for any parabolic subgroup $P$ of $G$, so there are some connections between combinatorics of the Weyl group and geometry of the orbits.

Now consider two closed subgroup $H_i$ of $G$, when is $ H_1 \backslash G / H_2$ finite? In such case, can we describe the $H_1$-orbits in $G/H_2$ using some group theoretic datas or combinatoric datas in general?

If $H_1$ is a Borel subgroup, the finiteness is equivalent to that $G/H_2$ is a spherical variety. And things become trivial if $H_1=G$. If $H_1=H_2$, is the finiteness equivalent to that $H_1=H_2$ is a parabolic subgroup? For lower rank $G$, can we classify all such pair $(H_1,H_2)$?

Source Link
Zhiyu
  • 6.6k
  • 2
  • 11
  • 44
Loading