Skip to main content
Commonmark migration
Source Link

Conjecture 1: Maximum($G_n$)=$\frac{n+2}{2}$ in case $n$ is even and Maximum($G_n$)=$\frac{n+1}{2}$ in case $n$ is odd.

 

Conjecture 2: a) For $n$ even the number of perfect tuples $(w,v)$ with $w=(n+2)/2$ is equal to $\frac{3^{n/2-1}+1}{2}$ when we identify two tuples $(w,v_1)$ and $(w,v_2)$ when $v_1$ is a cyclic shift of $v_2$.

 

b) For $n$ odd the number of perfect tuples $(w,v)$ with $w=(n+1)/2$ is equal to $n-1$ when we identify two tuples $(w,v_1)$ and $(w,v_2)$ when $v_1$ is a cyclic shift of $v_2$.

Conjecture 1: Maximum($G_n$)=$\frac{n+2}{2}$ in case $n$ is even and Maximum($G_n$)=$\frac{n+1}{2}$ in case $n$ is odd.

 

Conjecture 2: a) For $n$ even the number of perfect tuples $(w,v)$ with $w=(n+2)/2$ is equal to $\frac{3^{n/2-1}+1}{2}$ when we identify two tuples $(w,v_1)$ and $(w,v_2)$ when $v_1$ is a cyclic shift of $v_2$.

 

b) For $n$ odd the number of perfect tuples $(w,v)$ with $w=(n+1)/2$ is equal to $n-1$ when we identify two tuples $(w,v_1)$ and $(w,v_2)$ when $v_1$ is a cyclic shift of $v_2$.

Conjecture 1: Maximum($G_n$)=$\frac{n+2}{2}$ in case $n$ is even and Maximum($G_n$)=$\frac{n+1}{2}$ in case $n$ is odd.

Conjecture 2: a) For $n$ even the number of perfect tuples $(w,v)$ with $w=(n+2)/2$ is equal to $\frac{3^{n/2-1}+1}{2}$ when we identify two tuples $(w,v_1)$ and $(w,v_2)$ when $v_1$ is a cyclic shift of $v_2$.

b) For $n$ odd the number of perfect tuples $(w,v)$ with $w=(n+1)/2$ is equal to $n-1$ when we identify two tuples $(w,v_1)$ and $(w,v_2)$ when $v_1$ is a cyclic shift of $v_2$.

Notice removed Draw attention by CommunityBot
Bounty Ended with Gjergji Zaimi's answer chosen by CommunityBot
Notice added Draw attention by Mare
Bounty Started worth 200 reputation by Mare
added 606 characters in body; edited tags
Source Link
Mare
  • 26.5k
  • 6
  • 25
  • 104

edit: It might be also a good idea to think about conjecture 1 in terms of representation theory/homological algebra. Here is the non-elementary formulation of conjecture 1:

Let $A$ be a selfinjective (connected) Nakayama algebra with $n$ simple modules and Loewy length $w$ with $(n+2)/2 < w<n$. Then a generator $M$ with every non-projective indecomposable summand being simple has the property that $End_A(M)$ has infinite global dimension.

(equivalently, one can look at generators $M$ with every non-projective indecomposable summand being a radical of an indecomposable projective module).

edit: It might be also a good idea to think about conjecture 1 in terms of representation theory/homological algebra. Here is the non-elementary formulation of conjecture 1:

Let $A$ be a selfinjective (connected) Nakayama algebra with $n$ simple modules and Loewy length $w$ with $(n+2)/2 < w<n$. Then a generator $M$ with every non-projective indecomposable summand being simple has the property that $End_A(M)$ has infinite global dimension.

(equivalently, one can look at generators $M$ with every non-projective indecomposable summand being a radical of an indecomposable projective module).

edited body
Source Link
Mare
  • 26.5k
  • 6
  • 25
  • 104

The conjectures are tested with the computer for $n \leq 18$$n \leq 20$.

The conjectures are tested with the computer for $n \leq 18$.

The conjectures are tested with the computer for $n \leq 20$.

added 140 characters in body
Source Link
Mare
  • 26.5k
  • 6
  • 25
  • 104
Loading
[Edit removed during grace period]
Source Link
Mare
  • 26.5k
  • 6
  • 25
  • 104
Loading
added 1221 characters in body
Source Link
Mare
  • 26.5k
  • 6
  • 25
  • 104
Loading
Source Link
Mare
  • 26.5k
  • 6
  • 25
  • 104
Loading