Skip to main content
added 57 characters in body
Source Link
user30211
user30211

In algebraic number theory, one constructs for each number field $K$ a subring $\mathcal{O}_K$, the integral closure of $\mathbb{Z}$ inside $K$, which carries many of the properties which make $\mathbb{Z}$ a nice ring- it is a Dedekind Domain.

Hence, for a number field $K$, we have assigned an integral $\mathcal{O}_K$-algebra to each finite étale $K$-algebra. I am looking to see if there is some categorical formality behind this construction. More precisely, given a number ring $K$, what formal operation are we doing to the category of finite étale-$K$-algebras so as to pass to the category of $\mathcal{O}_K$-algebras?

By the way, one way of describing this assignment of $\mathcal{O}_L$, with $\mathcal{O}_K \subset K$ given, is to stipulate that (i) $\phi (\mathcal{O}_L ) = \mathcal{O}_L$ for each $K$-algebra map $\phi : L \rightarrow L$, (ii) $\mathcal{O}_L \cap K = \mathcal{O}_K$, and (iii) $\mathcal{O}_L$ is maximal as such. This is enough to show that $\mathcal{O}_L$ is the ring of integers of $L$ when $L$ is Galois over $K$. A modification gives a similar result for non Galois extensions. This may give some kind of hint.

In algebraic number theory, one constructs for each number field $K$ a subring $\mathcal{O}_K$ which carries many of the properties which make $\mathbb{Z}$ a nice ring- it is a Dedekind Domain.

Hence, for a number field $K$, we have assigned an integral $\mathcal{O}_K$-algebra to each finite étale $K$-algebra. I am looking to see if there is some categorical formality behind this construction. More precisely, given a number ring $K$, what operation are we doing to the category of finite étale-$K$-algebras so as to pass to the category of $\mathcal{O}_K$-algebras?

By the way, one way of describing this assignment of $\mathcal{O}_L$, with $\mathcal{O}_K \subset K$ given, is to stipulate that (i) $\phi (\mathcal{O}_L ) = \mathcal{O}_L$ for each $K$-algebra map $\phi : L \rightarrow L$, (ii) $\mathcal{O}_L \cap K = \mathcal{O}_K$, and (iii) $\mathcal{O}_L$ is maximal as such. This is enough to show that $\mathcal{O}_L$ is the ring of integers of $L$ when $L$ is Galois over $K$. A modification gives a similar result for non Galois extensions. This may give some kind of hint.

In algebraic number theory, one constructs for each number field $K$ a subring $\mathcal{O}_K$, the integral closure of $\mathbb{Z}$ inside $K$, which carries many of the properties which make $\mathbb{Z}$ a nice ring- it is a Dedekind Domain.

Hence, for a number field $K$, we have assigned an integral $\mathcal{O}_K$-algebra to each finite étale $K$-algebra. I am looking to see if there is some categorical formality behind this construction. More precisely, given a number ring $K$, what formal operation are we doing to the category of finite étale-$K$-algebras so as to pass to the category of $\mathcal{O}_K$-algebras?

By the way, one way of describing this assignment of $\mathcal{O}_L$, with $\mathcal{O}_K \subset K$ given, is to stipulate that (i) $\phi (\mathcal{O}_L ) = \mathcal{O}_L$ for each $K$-algebra map $\phi : L \rightarrow L$, (ii) $\mathcal{O}_L \cap K = \mathcal{O}_K$, and (iii) $\mathcal{O}_L$ is maximal as such. This is enough to show that $\mathcal{O}_L$ is the ring of integers of $L$ when $L$ is Galois over $K$. A modification gives a similar result for non Galois extensions. This may give some kind of hint.

Source Link
user30211
user30211

What is the formality behind passing from Number Fields to Number Rings

In algebraic number theory, one constructs for each number field $K$ a subring $\mathcal{O}_K$ which carries many of the properties which make $\mathbb{Z}$ a nice ring- it is a Dedekind Domain.

Hence, for a number field $K$, we have assigned an integral $\mathcal{O}_K$-algebra to each finite étale $K$-algebra. I am looking to see if there is some categorical formality behind this construction. More precisely, given a number ring $K$, what operation are we doing to the category of finite étale-$K$-algebras so as to pass to the category of $\mathcal{O}_K$-algebras?

By the way, one way of describing this assignment of $\mathcal{O}_L$, with $\mathcal{O}_K \subset K$ given, is to stipulate that (i) $\phi (\mathcal{O}_L ) = \mathcal{O}_L$ for each $K$-algebra map $\phi : L \rightarrow L$, (ii) $\mathcal{O}_L \cap K = \mathcal{O}_K$, and (iii) $\mathcal{O}_L$ is maximal as such. This is enough to show that $\mathcal{O}_L$ is the ring of integers of $L$ when $L$ is Galois over $K$. A modification gives a similar result for non Galois extensions. This may give some kind of hint.