Skip to main content
MathOverflow

Return to Question

I have added a clarification excluding singletons from the question statement, because the reference provided excludes singletons as well (see page 100, point 17)
Source Link
edit approved Sep 2, 2018 at 21:57
Stefano Gogioso
edit approved Sep 2, 2018 at 21:57
Stefano Gogioso
  • 627
  • 5
  • 13

Question: Is there a path connected subset of $\mathbb R^2$, without any bounded path connected subset (aside from singletons)?

Motivation: If we replace "path connected" by "connected", then the answer is positive. It was proven by Stefan Mazurkiewicz, see the original article.

Question: Is there a path connected subset of $\mathbb R^2$, without any bounded path connected subset ?

Motivation: If we replace "path connected" by "connected", then the answer is positive. It was proven by Stefan Mazurkiewicz, see the original article.

Question: Is there a path connected subset of $\mathbb R^2$, without any bounded path connected subset (aside from singletons)?

Motivation: If we replace "path connected" by "connected", then the answer is positive. It was proven by Stefan Mazurkiewicz, see the original article.

Source Link
Portland
Portland
  • 2.8k
  • 23
  • 35

Path connected without bounded path connected subset?

Question: Is there a path connected subset of $\mathbb R^2$, without any bounded path connected subset ?

Motivation: If we replace "path connected" by "connected", then the answer is positive. It was proven by Stefan Mazurkiewicz, see the original article.