Timeline for Reference request for statement on nlab: Reedy (co)fibrancy of (co)simplicial objects
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
7 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 21, 2018 at 15:50 | vote | accept | Lukas Woike | ||
| May 20, 2018 at 16:04 | answer | added | Charles Rezk | timeline score: 3 | |
| May 18, 2018 at 19:49 | comment | added | Lukas Woike | Thank you for your comments. How about the (opposite) category of chain complexes? In the end, I want to conclude that every cosimplicial (unbounded) chain complex is Reedy fibrant. Here I equip chain complexes with the projective model structure. | |
| May 18, 2018 at 19:14 | comment | added | Urs Schreiber | Apparently that's my bad. I forget what I thought when I wrote that statement. Fixed it here: ncatlab.org/nlab/show/… | |
| May 18, 2018 at 17:41 | comment | added | Mike Shulman | There surely must be some condition on the model category to make this true. Its truth for sets implies its truth in any presheaf category, and hence in any Grothendieck topos, hence in any Cisinski model category. But I'd be surprised if it were true in any category at all. | |
| May 16, 2018 at 21:00 | history | edited | j.c. | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
make URL into a link, fix typo
|
| May 16, 2018 at 10:21 | history | asked | Lukas Woike | CC BY-SA 4.0 |