Timeline for Do combinatorial model categories and Quillen adjunctions model presentable $\infty$-categories?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
9 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 12, 2021 at 11:48 | vote | accept | Tim Campion | ||
| Oct 12, 2021 at 3:34 | answer | added | Dmitri Pavlov | timeline score: 4 | |
| Jul 7, 2018 at 12:48 | answer | added | Urs Schreiber | timeline score: 4 | |
| May 8, 2018 at 11:13 | answer | added | Andrea Gagna | timeline score: 6 | |
| May 4, 2018 at 21:13 | answer | added | Mike Shulman | timeline score: 6 | |
| May 4, 2018 at 4:00 | comment | added | Dmitri Pavlov | Proposition 1.3.4.25 in Higher Algebra and Proposition A.3.7.8 in Higher Topos Theory may be useful for Question 1. The first one compares functor categories and ∞-categories, the second compares Bousfield localizations and ∞-localizations. Any combinatorial model category admits a presentation as a left Bousfield localization of simplicial presheaves on a small category. | |
| May 4, 2018 at 4:00 | comment | added | David White | Isn't question 2 a famously hard problem? Like, listed on Hovey's open problem list and in the Vistas section of his book? I feel like many, many papers have been written in that direction (e.g. Bergner's papers on homotopy (co)limits of model categories, work by Chorny, etc). Is there some reason to believe the problem has become easier? | |
| May 3, 2018 at 23:54 | history | edited | Tim Campion | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 251 characters in body
|
| May 3, 2018 at 22:20 | history | asked | Tim Campion | CC BY-SA 4.0 |