Timeline for Improved estimates of $n$ quantities via $n$ measurements
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
7 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 1, 2018 at 1:44 | comment | added | Iosif Pinelis | I also had this feeling, before and especially after your answer, that sometimes a few $0$'s are better than none. | |
| Apr 30, 2018 at 22:22 | comment | added | Aaron Meyerowitz | Yes, exactly. In general I’d think fewer 0’s is better (but sometimes some turns out better than none!) and all things treated the same is desirable. | |
| Apr 30, 2018 at 12:39 | comment | added | Iosif Pinelis | Very good and complete answer; I need education in experimental design. My only question at this point: Does $J$ denote the matrix of $1$'s? | |
| Apr 30, 2018 at 12:37 | vote | accept | Iosif Pinelis | ||
| Apr 30, 2018 at 9:47 | history | edited | Aaron Meyerowitz | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 333 characters in body
|
| Apr 30, 2018 at 8:53 | history | edited | Aaron Meyerowitz | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 89 characters in body
|
| Apr 30, 2018 at 8:44 | history | answered | Aaron Meyerowitz | CC BY-SA 3.0 |