Skip to main content
8 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Aug 19, 2022 at 7:27 history edited Martin Sleziak CC BY-SA 4.0
http -> https (the question was bumped anyway)
Aug 18, 2022 at 20:42 history edited LSpice CC BY-SA 4.0
Name of linked book, while this is on the front page
Nov 12, 2021 at 0:54 comment added Ian @Arshdeep Ito's lemma encapsulates the leading order (i.e. $O(dt)$) deterministic increment together with the leading order (i.e. $O(dt^{1/2})$) stochastic increment. Consequently for $W_t^3$ at $t=0$ what it reports is that both of those are zero. There's no contradiction, it's just an incomplete picture.
Jul 5, 2020 at 11:38 comment added Arshdeep Consider F(W)=$W^3$ expanded about 0. Taylor's expansion does not help in this case, and the higher (3rd order) term matters. Infact, the first and second order expansions are 0. How do your reconcile that with this?
Feb 3, 2020 at 12:08 comment added Rastapopoulos I understand the general idea but I'm confused about the details. Around what point do you write the formal expansion?
Jun 29, 2010 at 20:28 history edited Andrey Rekalo CC BY-SA 2.5
the formula corrected, a reference added
Jun 29, 2010 at 5:21 vote accept vonjd
Jun 28, 2010 at 15:00 history answered Andrey Rekalo CC BY-SA 2.5