Skip to main content
latex
Source Link
j.c.
  • 13.6k
  • 3
  • 52
  • 90

Is anyone else working through this paper: A theory of generalized Donaldson-Thomas invariants, by Dominic Joyce, Yinan Song? I am trying to verifying example 6.2 (m=2 for simplicity) using only the definitions, namely:

J^{2\alpha}(\tau) = -1/4$$J^{2\alpha}(\tau) = -1/4,$$

(where \alpha$\alpha$ satisfies M^{\alpha}_ss = M^{\alpha}_st$M^{\alpha}_{\mathrm{ss}} = M^{\alpha}_{\mathrm{st}}$ and that Ext^1(E, E)=0$\mathrm{Ext}^1(E, E)=0$ for any E \in M^{\alpha}_ss$E \in M^{\alpha}_{\mathrm{ss}}$ and finally that the only object of M^{m\alpha}_ss$M^{m\alpha}_{\mathrm{ss}}$ is E ^{\oplus m}$E ^{\oplus m}$).

I keep getting -3/4. Has anyone else attempted to make such a computation? Did you get the answer you are supposed to get?

Is anyone else working through this paper: A theory of generalized Donaldson-Thomas invariants, by Dominic Joyce, Yinan Song? I am trying to verifying example 6.2 (m=2 for simplicity) using only the definitions, namely:

J^{2\alpha}(\tau) = -1/4

(where \alpha satisfies M^{\alpha}_ss = M^{\alpha}_st and that Ext^1(E, E)=0 for any E \in M^{\alpha}_ss and finally that the only object of M^{m\alpha}_ss is E ^{\oplus m})

I keep getting -3/4. Has anyone else attempted to make such a computation? Did you get the answer you are supposed to get?

Is anyone else working through this paper: A theory of generalized Donaldson-Thomas invariants, by Dominic Joyce, Yinan Song? I am trying to verifying example 6.2 (m=2 for simplicity) using only the definitions, namely:

$$J^{2\alpha}(\tau) = -1/4,$$

(where $\alpha$ satisfies $M^{\alpha}_{\mathrm{ss}} = M^{\alpha}_{\mathrm{st}}$ and that $\mathrm{Ext}^1(E, E)=0$ for any $E \in M^{\alpha}_{\mathrm{ss}}$ and finally that the only object of $M^{m\alpha}_{\mathrm{ss}}$ is $E ^{\oplus m}$).

I keep getting -3/4. Has anyone else attempted to make such a computation? Did you get the answer you are supposed to get?

"a "A theory of generalized Donaldson-Thomas invariants" by Joyce & Song

Is anyone else working through this paper  : http://arxiv.org/abs/0810.5645A theory of generalized Donaldson-Thomas invariants  , by Dominic Joyce, Yinan Song? I am trying to verifying example 6.2 (m=2 for simplicity) using only the definitions, namely:

J^{2\alpha}(\tau) = -1/4

(where \alpha satisfies M^{\alpha}_ss = M^{\alpha}_st and that Ext^1(E, E)=0 for any E \in M^{\alpha}_ss and finally that the only object of M^{m\alpha}_ss is E ^{\oplus m})

I keep getting -3/4. Has anyone else attempted to make such a computation? Did you get the answer you are supposed to get?

"a theory of generalized Donaldson-Thomas invariants" by Joyce & Song

Is anyone else working through this paper  : http://arxiv.org/abs/0810.5645  ? I am trying to verifying example 6.2 (m=2 for simplicity) using only the definitions, namely:

J^{2\alpha}(\tau) = -1/4

(where \alpha satisfies M^{\alpha}_ss = M^{\alpha}_st and that Ext^1(E, E)=0 for any E \in M^{\alpha}_ss and finally that the only object of M^{m\alpha}_ss is E ^{\oplus m})

I keep getting -3/4. Has anyone else attempted to make such a computation? Did you get the answer you are supposed to get?

"A theory of generalized Donaldson-Thomas invariants" by Joyce & Song

Is anyone else working through this paper: A theory of generalized Donaldson-Thomas invariants, by Dominic Joyce, Yinan Song? I am trying to verifying example 6.2 (m=2 for simplicity) using only the definitions, namely:

J^{2\alpha}(\tau) = -1/4

(where \alpha satisfies M^{\alpha}_ss = M^{\alpha}_st and that Ext^1(E, E)=0 for any E \in M^{\alpha}_ss and finally that the only object of M^{m\alpha}_ss is E ^{\oplus m})

I keep getting -3/4. Has anyone else attempted to make such a computation? Did you get the answer you are supposed to get?

edited tags
Link
David E Speyer
  • 156.3k
  • 14
  • 421
  • 763
Source Link
David Steinberg
  • 2.2k
  • 2
  • 22
  • 36
Loading