Timeline for Projection of a gradient and the gradient of a projection
Current License: CC BY-SA 2.5
7 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 28, 2010 at 19:27 | vote | accept | m95lag | ||
| Jun 28, 2010 at 19:27 | vote | accept | m95lag | ||
| Jun 28, 2010 at 19:27 | |||||
| Jun 28, 2010 at 19:26 | vote | accept | m95lag | ||
| Jun 28, 2010 at 19:27 | |||||
| Jun 27, 2010 at 6:55 | answer | added | Richard Montgomery | timeline score: 2 | |
| Jun 25, 2010 at 5:12 | answer | added | Richard Montgomery | timeline score: 3 | |
| Jun 24, 2010 at 19:49 | comment | added | Willie Wong | What is the projection of a vector field in this case? If the definition is what I think it is, why not just differentiate under the integral? As long as the derivative is well-defined, and that the function $f$ is, say, compactly supported on the $z$ direction, then it should follow from the fundamental theorem of calculus. | |
| Jun 24, 2010 at 19:32 | history | asked | m95lag | CC BY-SA 2.5 |