Timeline for Comparison of two versions of fractional Sobolev spaces: do we have $W^{s,p}(\mathbb{R}^{n})=H^{s,p}(\mathbb{R}^{n})$?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
13 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
May 13, 2023 at 20:08 | history | edited | Guy Fsone | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 4 characters in body
|
Sep 11, 2021 at 19:22 | history | edited | Guy Fsone | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
deleted 4 characters in body
|
Dec 20, 2017 at 23:24 | history | edited | Delio Mugnolo | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 5 characters in body
|
Dec 20, 2017 at 19:59 | history | edited | Ben McKay | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
spelling, grammar, formatting
|
Dec 20, 2017 at 15:20 | history | edited | Guy Fsone | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
edited title
|
Dec 18, 2017 at 14:10 | vote | accept | Guy Fsone | ||
Dec 18, 2017 at 14:10 | |||||
Dec 18, 2017 at 12:24 | history | edited | Guy Fsone | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 3 characters in body
|
Dec 17, 2017 at 6:29 | comment | added | Martin Sleziak | This seems to be basically the same as the question you posted on math.SE: math.stackexchange.com/questions/2569423/… | |
Dec 16, 2017 at 17:41 | answer | added | Piero D'Ancona | timeline score: 10 | |
Dec 16, 2017 at 17:23 | comment | added | Guy Fsone | @ItaiBar-Natan in fact you are right it is the completion. The schwarz space is there only to insure that the Fourier makes sense:) | |
Dec 16, 2017 at 17:17 | comment | added | Itai Bar-Natan | For $H^{s,p}$, did you mean to take the completion of this space? As currently defined, it is a subspace of Schwartz space that is not complete with the norm you gave it. | |
Dec 16, 2017 at 17:07 | review | First posts | |||
Dec 16, 2017 at 17:09 | |||||
Dec 16, 2017 at 17:04 | history | asked | Guy Fsone | CC BY-SA 3.0 |